https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847901
Björn besser82 Esser bjoern.es...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) |
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847901
--- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
spamprobe-1.4d-3.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 stable repository.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847901
--- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
spamprobe-1.4d-3.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 stable repository.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847901
--- Comment #24 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
spamprobe-1.4d-3.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 stable repository.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847901
--- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
spamprobe-1.4d-3.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847901
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847901
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847901
Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|ke...@scrye.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847901
--- Comment #11 from Steven Roberts strob...@strobe.net ---
I was wondering about bumping the the release number. I wasn't sure if should
bump inside of a review. I'm good with bumping the number more often.
Thank you for the sourceforge link.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847901
Steven Roberts strob...@strobe.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847901
--- Comment #13 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847901
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847901
--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
spamprobe-1.4d-3.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/spamprobe-1.4d-3.el5
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847901
--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
spamprobe-1.4d-3.fc16 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 16.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/spamprobe-1.4d-3.fc16
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847901
--- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
spamprobe-1.4d-3.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/spamprobe-1.4d-3.fc17
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847901
--- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
spamprobe-1.4d-3.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/spamprobe-1.4d-3.fc18
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847901
--- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
spamprobe-1.4d-3.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/spamprobe-1.4d-3.el6
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847901
--- Comment #8 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com ---
So, here's what fedora-review says:
Package Review
==
Key:
- = N/A
x = Pass
! = Fail
? = Not evaluated
C/C++
[x]: MUST Header files in -devel subpackage, if
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847901
--- Comment #9 from Steven Roberts strob...@strobe.net ---
Did the two changes. New spec,SRPM uploaded.
Funny, those were from me dropping %makeinstall :)
I had actually just started looking at fedora-review. I was reading the fedora
review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847901
--- Comment #5 from Steven Roberts strob...@strobe.net ---
1. dropped the prefix specification. This spec file was created a while ago
and back then was cut from template that used relocatable packages. It was
back in the days before LVM2, yum
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847901
--- Comment #6 from Steven Roberts strob...@strobe.net ---
new SRPM URL: http://rpm.ysl.org/fedora-review/spamprobe-1.4d-2.el6.src.rpm
%make_install is not available under EL 5, hence the compile errors. I
switched to using: 'make
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847901
--- Comment #7 from Steven Roberts strob...@strobe.net ---
thank you for the feedback. please let me know what I should be changing still
:)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847901
Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847901
--- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com ---
Some general comments/suggestions/changes before the review:
1. Please don't define %{prefix}
2. (not a blocker, but IMHO a good idea) consider using the dist tag on your
version
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847901
Steven Roberts strob...@strobe.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||177841
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847901
Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ke...@scrye.com
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847901
--- Comment #2 from Steven Roberts strob...@strobe.net ---
updated make invocation to use %{?_smp_mflags} for parallel building. specfile
and SRPM updated.
did tests locally on a centos6 box with -J 3 set, koji f18, and koji EL6 and
all worked
27 matches
Mail list logo
