https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=850469
--- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
rubygem-Ascii85-1.0.1-5.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 stable
repository.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=850469
--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
rubygem-Ascii85-1.0.1-7.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable
repository.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=850469
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=850469
--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
rubygem-Ascii85-1.0.1-5.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 stable
repository.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=850469
Vít Ondruch vondr...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=850469
--- Comment #5 from Miroslav Suchý msu...@redhat.com ---
Man generation flags
fixed
Separate license file
done:
http://rubyforge.org/tracker/index.php?func=detailaid=29629group_id=7826atid=30313
BuildRequires: perl
This is because perl is
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=850469
Miroslav Suchý msu...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs+
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=850469
Miroslav Suchý msu...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs+ |
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=850469
Miroslav Suchý msu...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=850469
--- Comment #7 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=850469
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=850469
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
rubygem-Ascii85-1.0.1-5.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rubygem-Ascii85-1.0.1-5.fc18
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=850469
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
rubygem-Ascii85-1.0.1-5.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rubygem-Ascii85-1.0.1-5.fc17
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=850469
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
rubygem-Ascii85-1.0.1-5.fc16 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 16.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rubygem-Ascii85-1.0.1-5.fc16
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=850469
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
rubygem-Ascii85-1.0.1-7.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rubygem-Ascii85-1.0.1-7.el6
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=850469
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=850469
Vít Ondruch vondr...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=850469
--- Comment #2 from Vít Ondruch vondr...@redhat.com ---
* Man pages
- Wouldn't be better to keep the .pod file in original form, i.e. no tarball?
It is so small that the benefits (you can read it in your editor, it could
be kept in git
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=850469
--- Comment #3 from Miroslav Suchý msu...@redhat.com ---
man pages
I use tito for packaging. And it include in src.rpm only files with extenstion
from this list:
'.tar.gz', '.tgz', '.tar.bz2', '.tar', '.zip', '.jar', '.gem', .spec,
.patch
So I
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=850469
Miroslav Suchý msu...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||850679
--
You are
20 matches
Mail list logo
