https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=855780
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Blocks|652183 (FE-JAVA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=855780
Mikolaj Izdebski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
Assignee|mizde...@redha
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=855780
Mikolaj Izdebski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|high|unspecified
--
You are receiving t
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=855780
Christopher Meng changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||needinfo?(mizdebsk@redhat.c
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=855780
Bill Nottingham changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|package-review@lists.fedora |
|project.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=855780
Mikolaj Izdebski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(mizdebsk@redhat.c |
|om)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=855780
--- Comment #23 from gil cattaneo ---
pong?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=H8SeFA1guU&a=cc_unsubscribe
___
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=855780
Christopher Meng changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||cicku...@gmail.com
Flags
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=855780
--- Comment #21 from gil cattaneo ---
Spec URL: http://gil.fedorapeople.org/apacheds-daemon.spec
SRPM URL: http://gil.fedorapeople.org/apacheds-daemon-1.1.8-2.fc19.src.rpm
- removed POM modifications
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=855780
--- Comment #20 from Mikolaj Izdebski ---
POM modifications just to remove warnings are missing the point. If there is a
warning in the first place then the real reson should be fixed, not symptom.
You can keep these modifications if you provid
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=855780
--- Comment #19 from gil cattaneo ---
Spec URL: http://gil.fedorapeople.org/apacheds-daemon.spec
SRPM URL: http://gil.fedorapeople.org/apacheds-daemon-1.1.8-2.fc19.src.rpm
Task info: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=5553676
-
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=855780
--- Comment #18 from gil cattaneo ---
Spec URL: http://gil.fedorapeople.org/apacheds-daemon.spec
SRPM URL: http://gil.fedorapeople.org/apacheds-daemon-1.1.8-2.fc18.src.rpm
- replace mvn-rpmbuild with mvn_build
--
You are receiving this mail be
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=855780
Bug 855780 depends on bug 977901, which changed state.
Bug 977901 Summary: java-service-wrapper: Wrong installation directory
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=977901
What|Removed |Added
-
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=855780
Bug 855780 depends on bug 977904, which changed state.
Bug 977904 Summary: java-service-wrapper: Please install Maven POM file
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=977904
What|Removed |Added
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=855780
--- Comment #17 from Mikolaj Izdebski ---
Please convert the package to current packaging guidelines. This means using
%mvn_build instead of mvn-rpmbuild. mvn-rpmbuild is a legacy feature and it
shouldn't be used for new packages.
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=855780
--- Comment #16 from gil cattaneo ---
Task info: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=5539859
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=855780
--- Comment #15 from gil cattaneo ---
Great! thanks
Spec URL: http://gil.fedorapeople.org/apacheds-daemon.spec
SRPM URL: http://gil.fedorapeople.org/apacheds-daemon-1.1.8-2.fc18.src.rpm
- removed java-service-wrapper workarounds
--
You are re
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=855780
--- Comment #14 from Mikolaj Izdebski ---
java-service-wrapper is fixed in rawhide now, you should remove your
workarounds.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=855780
--- Comment #13 from Mikolaj Izdebski ---
I have filled 2 bugs for java-service-wrapper package. That's what should be
done instead of adding ugly hacks like scope "system" and systemPath...
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on t
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=855780
Mikolaj Izdebski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||977904
--
You are receiving this mai
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=855780
Mikolaj Izdebski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||977901
--
You are receiving this mai
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=855780
--- Comment #12 from Mikolaj Izdebski ---
(In reply to gil cattaneo from comment #11)
> > > %pom_xpath_inject
> > > "pom:project/pom:reporting/pom:plugins/pom:plugin[pom:artifactId='maven-surefire-report-plugin']"
> > > "
> > > any"
> >
> the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=855780
--- Comment #11 from gil cattaneo ---
(In reply to Mikolaj Izdebski from comment #10)
>
> > %global bits %(rpm --eval %{__isa_bits} | sed 's/32//')
> > #%%global libdir %%{_prefix}/lib%%{bits}
>
> That's not needed (see above).
>
> > # svn
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=855780
--- Comment #10 from Mikolaj Izdebski ---
There are several problems with this package.
First of all, the package is noarch, but depends on arch-specific packages and
hardcodes paths to libraries. This means that if this package is built on
32-b
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=855780
--- Comment #9 from gil cattaneo ---
Spec URL: http://gil.fedorapeople.org/apacheds-daemon.spec
SRPM URL: http://gil.fedorapeople.org/apacheds-daemon-1.1.8-2.fc18.src.rpm
- minor changes for the new guideline
--
You are receiving this mail bec
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=855780
Mikolaj Izdebski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|medium |high
--- Comment #8 from Mikolaj Izde
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=855780
--- Comment #7 from Mikolaj Izdebski ---
As it's now the package won't work peoperly, the problem is libdir usage in
noarch package.
If package is built on 64-bit system then in pom.xml file will
contain reference to /usr/lib64 and this package
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=855780
Mikolaj Izdebski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review?
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=855780
--- Comment #6 from gil cattaneo ---
Spec URL: http://gil.fedorapeople.org/apacheds-daemon/1/apacheds-daemon.spec
SRPM URL:
http://gil.fedorapeople.org/apacheds-daemon/1/apacheds-daemon-1.1.8-2.fc16.src.rpm
- fix build problems x86_64 arch
test
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=855780
--- Comment #5 from Mikolaj Izdebski ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> build fine also with java-service-wrapper
> but i dont know how fix the problem if use x86_64 arch in koji
This will definitely have to be resolved.
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=855780
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(puntogil@libero.i |
|t)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=855780
--- Comment #3 from Mikolaj Izdebski ---
This package depends on tanukisoft:wrapper, but currently nothing in fedora
provides this artifact.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=855780
Mikolaj Izdebski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||needinfo?(puntogil@libero.i
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=855780
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||823967
--
You are receiving this mail be
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=855780
Mikolaj Izdebski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=855780
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||652183 (FE-JAVASIG)
--
You are receiving
36 matches
Mail list logo
