Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=857639
--- Comment #29 from Fedora Update System ---
duff-0.5.2-5.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
Y
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=857639
--- Comment #28 from Fedora Update System ---
duff-0.5.2-5.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
Y
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=857639
--- Comment #27 from Fedora Update System ---
duff-0.5.2-5.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
Y
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=857639
Bug 857639 depends on bug 859795, which changed state.
Bug 859795 Summary: Review Request: sha - File hashing utility
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=859795
What|Removed |Added
-
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=857639
--- Comment #26 from Fedora Update System ---
duff-0.5.2-5.fc16 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 16.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/duff-0.5.2-5.fc16
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC l
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=857639
--- Comment #25 from Fedora Update System ---
duff-0.5.2-5.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/duff-0.5.2-5.fc17
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC l
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=857639
--- Comment #24 from Fedora Update System ---
duff-0.5.2-5.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/duff-0.5.2-5.fc18
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC l
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=857639
Bug 857639 depends on bug 859795, which changed state.
Bug 859795 Summary: Review Request: sha - File hashing utility
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=859795
What|Removed |Added
-
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=857639
--- Comment #23 from Michael Schwendt ---
* Directory %{_datadir}/duff/ is not included.
> %check
> make DESTDIR=%{buildroot} check
Didn't perform any checks according to the build.log.
Btw, as %check is run after %install, on
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=857639
Bug 857639 depends on bug 859795, which changed state.
Bug 859795 Summary: Review Request: sha - File hashing utility
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=859795
What|Removed |Added
-
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=857639
--- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System ---
duff-0.5.2-4.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 stable repository.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=857639
--- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System ---
duff-0.5.2-4.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
Y
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=857639
--- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System ---
duff-0.5.2-4.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 stable repository.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=857639
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Re
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=857639
--- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System ---
duff-0.5.2-4.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 testing repository.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=857639
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--
You are
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=857639
--- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System ---
duff-0.5.2-4.fc16 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 16.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/duff-0.5.2-4.fc16
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC l
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=857639
--- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System ---
duff-0.5.2-4.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/duff-0.5.2-4.fc17
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC l
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=857639
--- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System ---
duff-0.5.2-4.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/duff-0.5.2-4.fc18
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC l
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=857639
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=857639
--- Comment #15 from Eduardo Echeverria ---
rpmlint -v duff-0.5.2-4.fc17.x86_64.rpm
duff.x86_64: I: checking
duff.x86_64: I: checking-url http://duff.sourceforge.net/ (timeout 10 seconds)
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=857639
--- Comment #14 from Eduardo Echeverria ---
Created attachment 636880
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=636880&action=edit
Remove docs of bundle sha
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=857639
--- Comment #13 from Eduardo Echeverria ---
Created attachment 636879
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=636879&action=edit
Linking to shared library of sha
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=857639
--- Comment #12 from Eduardo Echeverria ---
I've built duff against the sha libs, here the spec and SRPM, I grateful a
final review please
SPEC:http://echevemaster.fedorapeople.org/duff/4/duff.spec
SRPM: http://echevemaster.fedorapeople.org/duff/
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=857639
--- Comment #11 from Eduardo Echeverria ---
Toshio, Luis I contacted to Allan Saddi (shaX-asaddi) and provided me the
necessary source for building shared libraries for duff, now need to do the
necessary changes to link against it
Sha is in BZ
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=857639
Eduardo Echeverria changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||859795
--
You are receiving this m
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=857639
--- Comment #10 from Toshio Ernie Kuratomi ---
btw, I found those files by doing grep -ri license in the top level of the
source tree and noticing that some things talking about different licenses the
sha* implementation. That lead to more scrut
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=857639
--- Comment #9 from Toshio Ernie Kuratomi ---
I see some problems here. Including a bundled piece of hashing code: the sha*
files are taken from here: http://hg.saddi.com/sha-asaddi
That code doesn't produce a shared library -- it just builds a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=857639
--- Comment #8 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=857639
Eduardo Echeverria changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #7 from Edu
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=857639
Luis Bazan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--
You are receiving this mail be
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=857639
Luis Bazan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review+
--
You are receiving this m
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=857639
Luis Bazan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|bazanlui...@gmail.com
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=857639
--- Comment #6 from Luis Bazan ---
# rpmlint -v duff-0.5.2-3.fc17.src.rpm
duff.src: I: checking
duff.src: I: checking-url http://duff.sourceforge.net/ (timeout 10 seconds)
duff.src: I: checking-url
http://sourceforge.net/projects/duff/files/duff
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=857639
--- Comment #5 from Luis Bazan ---
Package Review
==
Key:
- = N/A
x = Pass
! = Fail
? = Not evaluated
C/C++
[x]: MUST Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[x]: MUST Package does not contain any libtool archives
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=857639
--- Comment #4 from Eduardo Echeverria ---
Remove rm -rf buildroot in the clean section
Corrected Spec and SRPM =
Spec URL: http://echevemaster.fedorapeople.org/duff/3/duff.spec
SRPM URL: ht
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=857639
--- Comment #3 from Eduardo Echeverria ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> Initial comments:
>
> * no need to
> BuildRequires: glibc-devel
> see:
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Exceptions_2
> (glibc-devel is a dependency of gcc
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=857639
Rex Dieter changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rdie...@math.unl.edu
--- Comment #2 from Re
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=857639
Eduardo Echeverria changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|duff - Quickly find |Review Request: duff -
39 matches
Mail list logo
