Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=863571
--- Comment #42 from Fedora Update System ---
flare-0.17.1-8.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 stable repository.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
__
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=863571
--- Comment #41 from Fedora Update System ---
flare-0.17.1-8.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 stable repository.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
__
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=863571
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Re
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=863571
--- Comment #40 from Fedora Update System ---
flare-0.17.1-8.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 stable repository.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
__
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=863571
--- Comment #39 from Fedora Update System ---
flare-0.17.1-8.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 testing repository.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=863571
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--
You are
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=863571
--- Comment #38 from Fedora Update System ---
flare-0.17.1-8.fc16 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 16.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/flare-0.17.1-8.fc16
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=863571
--- Comment #37 from Fedora Update System ---
flare-0.17.1-8.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/flare-0.17.1-8.fc18
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=863571
--- Comment #36 from Fedora Update System ---
flare-0.17.1-8.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/flare-0.17.1-8.fc17
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=863571
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |MODIFIED
--
You
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=863571
--- Comment #35 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
pack
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=863571
Erik Schilling changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=863571
--- Comment #33 from Kevin Kofler ---
AFAIK, the way most people handle this is that they import the version that was
reviewed, then commit and push the fix and then do their first build.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=863571
--- Comment #32 from Erik Schilling ---
Hi :)
First thank you a lot for the review!
Now I made the directory listing a bit shorter/more flexible after Kevins
comment. I am not that familiar with this packaging process yet. So I
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=863571
Volker Fröhlich changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=863571
--- Comment #30 from Volker Fröhlich ---
I just noticed you did.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=863571
--- Comment #29 from Volker Fröhlich ---
If you didn't change anything else, just upload the spec file. Then we can
finish this.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=863571
--- Comment #28 from Erik Schilling ---
Hm. I think i maybe forgot the trailing /. I will try it locally. Will wait
with uploading until there are other more "urgent" problems though :)
Thanks for pointing out.
Erik
--
You are receiving this m
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=863571
--- Comment #27 from Kevin Kofler ---
Are there also files (not just directories) in mods/? Then you can try:
%dir %{_datadir}/%{name}/mods/*/
But of course, listing all the directories explicitly as you did will also
work.
--
You are receivin
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=863571
--- Comment #26 from Erik Schilling ---
This * somehow did not worked as intented. But i now made sure that all
directories are owned.
New SRPM: http://ablu.fedorapeople.org/flare-0.17.1-7.fc17.src.rpm
Updated Spec: http://ablu.fedorapeople.org/
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=863571
--- Comment #25 from Kevin Kofler ---
You're missing the directory ownership:
%dir %{_datadir}/%{name}
%dir %{_datadir}/%{name}/mods
%dir %{_datadir}/%{name}/mods/*
%dir %{_datadir}/%{name}/mods/*/languages
--
You are receiving this mail becaus
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=863571
--- Comment #24 from Erik Schilling ---
new SRPM: http://ablu.fedorapeople.org/flare-0.17.1-6.fc17.src.rpm
updated spec: http://ablu.fedorapeople.org/flare.spec
no koji build again because of bad upload
Changelog:
- Spell-fix: reimplementation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=863571
--- Comment #23 from Erik Schilling ---
Ok i talked with my sponsor about it. I will just add list of files in same
package.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=863571
--- Comment #22 from Erik Schilling ---
Is there a elegant way to prevent getting around adding all files except this
ones in the %files section? (using %{_datadir}/%{name} will of course mark all
as twice listed). Shall i do a seperate subpackag
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=863571
--- Comment #21 from Kevin Kofler ---
If %find_lang doesn't find your files, you need to use the %lang tag directly
(a separate one per language).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=863571
--- Comment #20 from Erik Schilling ---
> The %find_lang macro must still be used. Careful about the files section
> then! As soon as that's implemented, the package is good to go.
hm. Don't i only need this for compiled translations? This proj
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=863571
--- Comment #19 from Volker Fröhlich ---
The %find_lang macro must still be used. Careful about the files section then!
As soon as that's implemented, the package is good to go.
reimplementation --> re-implementation
Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=863571
--- Comment #18 from Erik Schilling ---
Spec URL: http://ablu.fedorapeople.org/flare.spec
new SRPM URL: http://ablu.fedorapeople.org/flare-0.17.1-5.fc17.src.rpm
I again did no koji build because it takes ages to upload here. But i did local
buil
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=863571
--- Comment #17 from Volker Fröhlich ---
Ad cosmetics:
You're adding an extra slash in front of "/usr" . It works and I personally
don't mind.
rm -f
%{buildroot}/%{_datadir}/%{name}/mods/default/fonts/LiberationSans-Regular.ttf
=>
rm -f
/home
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=863571
--- Comment #16 from Erik Schilling ---
Hello, Thanks for the comments
I will talk with upstream about using a different font
Will find a way to link flare against bundeled SDL_gfx. Thanks for pointing out
this duplication. Did not noticed it.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=863571
--- Comment #15 from Volker Fröhlich ---
Please use the name macro on Source1.
As you already said, the license for the data sub-package was found correct:
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/legal/2012-October/001992.html
--
You are rece
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=863571
--- Comment #14 from Volker Fröhlich ---
I found parts of SDL_gfx bundled. Please link the system library instead:
SDL_gfxBlitFunc.h
SDL_gfxBlitFunc.c
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=863571
--- Comment #13 from Kevin Kofler ---
We have one or two versions of the Unifont as actual bitmap fonts in Fedora, in
particular, we definitely have WQY Bitmap Song, I'm not sure whether we also
have it packaged as Unifont.
If you really need it
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=863571
--- Comment #12 from Erik Schilling ---
The answer we got from the mailling list is correct i think. CC BY SA would be
the most restrictive license. I *could* list only this license since all other
mentioned licenses are less restrictive. I am no
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=863571
--- Comment #11 from Volker Fröhlich ---
This seems to be upstream: http://unifoundry.com/unifont.html
Please ask the font SIG whether there is a proper substitute available:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Category:Fonts_SIG
On the license ques
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=863571
--- Comment #10 from Erik Schilling ---
About license: https://github.com/clintbellanger/flare-game/wiki/Credits
I simply listed all licenses
About the font: I was not able to find this version of the font in fedora. So i
left it there. Is this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=863571
--- Comment #9 from Volker Fröhlich ---
Can you explain why the license for the data sub-package is "CC-BY-SA and CC-BY
and CC0 and Public Domain"? README claims it is "CC-BY-SA 3.0. Later versions
are permitted.".
There's one more bundled font:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=863571
Volker Fröhlich changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|volke...@gmx.at
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=863571
Volker Fröhlich changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review?
--
You are receiving t
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=863571
--- Comment #8 from Erik Schilling ---
Updated SRPM: http://ablu.fedorapeople.org/flare-0.17.1-4.fc17.src.rpm
Sorry i did no koji build because uploading this takes ages with my internet.
But i did local mock build.
Thanks for the suggestions!
E
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=863571
--- Comment #7 from Erik Schilling ---
Ok. Thanks. I will fix that + the other issues as soon as possible and will
upload new srpm/specfile.
Thanks for help
Erik
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=863571
--- Comment #6 from Kevin Kofler ---
Apparently, in this case, the data is over 100 MiB whereas the code is less
than 1 MiB, so I think having a separate -data noarch subpackage is useful
here, please don't drop it.
--
You are receiving this ma
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=863571
Kevin Kofler changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ke...@tigcc.ticalc.org
--- Comment #5 fro
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=863571
--- Comment #4 from Erik Schilling ---
Hello,
Thanks a lot for the comments.
Yes it does not make too much sense of having flare and flare-data seperate...
Shall i drop the subpackage?
Regards
Erik
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=863571
Volker Fröhlich changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||volke...@gmx.at
--- Comment #3 from Vo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=863571
--- Comment #2 from Erik Schilling ---
Dropped the use of /usr/share/games:
koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4567075
srpm: http://ablu.fedorapeople.org/flare-0.17.1-3.fc17.src.rpm
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=863571
--- Comment #1 from Erik Schilling ---
I added BuildArch: noarch for the data package.
koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4566158
srpm: http://ablu.fedorapeople.org/flare-0.17.1-2.fc17.src.rpm
--
You are receiving this mai
47 matches
Mail list logo
