https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=864084
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||652183 (FE-JAVASIG)
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=864084
Mikolaj Izdebski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mizde...@redhat.com
--- Comment #1 fr
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=864084
--- Comment #2 from gil cattaneo ---
Spec URL: http://gil.fedorapeople.org/maven-native/1/maven-native.spec
SRPM URL:
http://gil.fedorapeople.org/maven-native/1/maven-native-1.0-0.2.alpha.7.fc16.src.rpm
- fix javac target
tested on: http://koji
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=864084
Mikolaj Izdebski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|nob...@fe
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=864084
Mikolaj Izdebski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
Assigne
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=864084
Matthew Farrellee changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||985087
Referenced Bugs:
https://
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=864084
--- Comment #8 from gil cattaneo ---
Spec URL: http://gil.fedorapeople.org/maven-native/1/maven-native.spec
SRPM URL:
http://gil.fedorapeople.org/maven-native/1/maven-native-1.0-0.2.alpha.7.fc18.src.rpm
- fix license tag
--
You are receiving t
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=864084
Björn Esser changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=864084
--- Comment #10 from gil cattaneo ---
hi
(In reply to Björn Esser from comment #9)
> Created attachment 759546 [details]
> Test failures
>
> Package has a few issues:
>
> BLOCKERS:
> * Maven packages should use new style packaging
i cant us
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=864084
--- Comment #11 from Björn Esser ---
Hi Gil!
(In reply to gil cattaneo from comment #10)
> i cant use xmvn binary in F18 isn't available
OK, so keep that in mind (or comment in spec) to change when F18 is fading/EOL.
#
How about the test
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=864084
--- Comment #12 from gil cattaneo ---
hi Björn
(In reply to Björn Esser from comment #11)
> Hi Gil!
>
> (In reply to gil cattaneo from comment #10)
> > i cant use xmvn binary in F18 isn't available
>
> OK, so keep that in mind (or comment in sp
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=864084
Björn Esser changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=864084
--- Comment #14 from Björn Esser ---
(In reply to gil cattaneo from comment #12)
> the missing class is provided by mvn(org.apache.maven:maven-artifact).
> and for now, only for this case, caused some troubles during the testing,
> but the hadhoo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=864084
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #15 from gil catt
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=864084
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=864084
--- Comment #16 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=xGyES4beD5&a=cc_unsubscribe
_
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=864084
--- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System ---
maven-native-1.0-0.3.alpha.7.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora
19.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/maven-native-1.0-0.3.alpha.7.fc19
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=864084
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=864084
--- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System ---
maven-native-1.0-0.3.alpha.7.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora
18.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/maven-native-1.0-0.3.alpha.7.fc18
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=864084
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #19 from Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=864084
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=864084
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|652183 (FE-JAVASIG) |
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=864084
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|maven-native-1.0-0.3.alpha. |maven-native-1.0-0.3.alpha.
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=864084
--- Comment #5 from Pete MacKinnon ---
Created attachment 731271
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=731271&action=edit
Patch for spec file to get maven-native to build on F18 with Java7
--
You are receiving this
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=864084
--- Comment #6 from gil cattaneo ---
Spec URL: http://gil.fedorapeople.org/maven-native/1/maven-native.spec
SRPM URL:
http://gil.fedorapeople.org/maven-native/1/maven-native-1.0-0.2.alpha.7.fc18.src.rpm
hi Pete, thanks for your h
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=864084
--- Comment #7 from Pete MacKinnon ---
Ahhh, I'm sorry. I didn't have that in your original spec file. Your property
approach is cleaner. Probably don't need my %pom_xpath_inject stanza after all.
Whichever way you see fit is fine
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=864084
Timothy St. Clair changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tstcl...@redhat.com
Fla
27 matches
Mail list logo
