https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=866183
Brendan Jones changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Review Request: mididings - |Review Request:
|A MID
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=866183
--- Comment #3 from Brendan Jones ---
OK, mididings upstream have a patch for python-decorator 3.3.3 which has been
submitted to the python-decorator author so I'll proceed with python3 support
as per the SPEC above.
--
You are receiving this m
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=866183
Brendan Jones changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||867894
--
You are receiving this mail b
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=866183
--- Comment #4 from Brendan Jones ---
Can I interest anyone in a review swap to finsih this off?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=866183
Volker Fröhlich changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|volke...@gmx.at
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=866183
--- Comment #5 from Volker Fröhlich ---
Please bump the release when you publish a changed version.
F17 build fails due to a linking issue:
F17: http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/601/4700601/build.log
Rawhide: http:/
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=866183
--- Comment #6 from Brendan Jones ---
I'll have to disable python3-mididings for F17 and lower. There are now python3
boost bindings for 1.48.x in F17
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=866183
--- Comment #7 from Brendan Jones ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> I'll have to disable python3-mididings for F17 and lower. There are now
> python3 boost bindings for 1.48.x in F17
That should read " *no* python3 boost bindings "
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=866183
Bug 866183 depends on bug 867894, which changed state.
Bug 867894 Summary: Please update to version 3.4.0
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=867894
What|Removed |Added
-
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=866183
Mamoru TASAKA changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||needinfo?(volke...@gmx.at
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=866183
Volker Fröhlich changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(volke...@gmx.at) |
--- Comment #9 from V
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=866183
--- Comment #11 from Mamoru TASAKA ---
Also, package maintainer need not use the same spec file for all branches (i.e.
rawhide / F-18 / F-17)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscrib
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=866183
--- Comment #10 from Mamoru TASAKA ---
Well, the fact that srpm in review does not build on F-17 is not a review
blocker, actually.
Srpm in review must build at least on _rawhide_ , however for F-18 and below,
the submitter (who
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=866183
--- Comment #12 from Brendan Jones ---
(In reply to comment #11)
> Also, package maintainer need not use the same spec file for all branches
> (i.e. rawhide / F-18 / F-17)
Yes, I will use a different spec for f17
--
You are rec
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=866183
--- Comment #13 from Volker Fröhlich ---
Good, I'm at it.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=Y1qfJ04uUf&a=cc_unsubscribe
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=866183
--- Comment #14 from Volker Fröhlich ---
livedings is a graphical application that requires tkinter to run.
Consequently, it will need a desktop file.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
U
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=866183
--- Comment #15 from Volker Fröhlich ---
livedings also requires pyliblo. I'm not sure if there's a Python 3 version.
It seems like it's not necessary to export the optflags.
Package Review
==
Key:
[x] = Pass
[!] =
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=866183
--- Comment #16 from Volker Fröhlich ---
Just a reminder
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=GpV9n1FtK2&a=cc_unsubscribe
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=866183
Volker Fröhlich changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||needinfo?
--- Comment
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=866183
Volker Fröhlich changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Resolut
20 matches
Mail list logo
