Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=866188
--- Comment #6 from Mario Blättermann mario.blaetterm...@gmail.com ---
After having a first look at the sources, I read this:
Notes to packagers: Non-Mixer, Non-DAW, and Non-Session-Manager,
although stored in the same
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=866188
--- Comment #7 from Brendan Jones brendan.jones...@gmail.com ---
Good question. Non-session-manager is already packaged, the sequencer is up for
review by someone else but is in stasis and non-mixer is also packaged.
Upstream do
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=866188
Mario Blättermann mario.blaetterm...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=866188
--- Comment #9 from Mario Blättermann mario.blaetterm...@gmail.com ---
Scratch build:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4725613
$ rpmlint -i -v *
non-mixer.src: I: checking
non-mixer.src: I: checking-url
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=866188
--- Comment #10 from Brendan Jones brendan.jones...@gmail.com ---
Thanks for the effort Mario.
You've got me thinking. I think I will generate the other programs from a
single source, probably the non-daw package which is already
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=866188
Mario Blättermann mario.blaetterm...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=866188
--- Comment #5 from Mario Blättermann mario.blaetterm...@gmail.com ---
The srpm link is 404, the correct one is:
http://bsjones.fedorapeople.org/non-mixer-1.0.0-0.3.gitae6b78cf.fc18.src.rpm
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=866188
Mario Blättermann mario.blaetterm...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=866188
--- Comment #4 from Volker Fröhlich volke...@gmx.at ---
Well, we must not change the license file, but correcting the postal address in
headers should be fine, from my point of view. It's not a must anyway.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=866188
--- Comment #2 from Brendan Jones brendan.jones...@gmail.com ---
Thanks for the comments.
Upstream releases all of his projects together in the one repository, which
happens to be named non-daw.
Upstream has bee notified of the FSF addesses,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=866188
Volker Fröhlich volke...@gmx.at changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||volke...@gmx.at
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=866188
Brendan Jones brendan.jones...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||805236
12 matches
Mail list logo
