Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=866495
--- Comment #29 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
vzctl-4.1-2.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 stable repository.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=866495
--- Comment #28 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
vzctl-4.1-2.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 stable repository.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=866495
Dan Horák d...@danny.cz changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||d...@danny.cz
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=866495
--- Comment #24 from Glauber Costa glom...@gmail.com ---
vzsyscalls.h is the entry point for the OpenVZ kernel, that we don't use in
Fedora. (We do keep the package in its full, it would be a lot more trouble to
strip it).
As for
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=866495
--- Comment #25 from Dan Horák d...@danny.cz ---
Then it would be nice if vzctl could build also on arches without the OpenVZ
kernel, right now it fails on s390(x) with
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=866495
--- Comment #26 from Glauber Costa glom...@gmail.com ---
Ok, I am working in a patch to it right now.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=866495
--- Comment #27 from Dan Horák d...@danny.cz ---
(In reply to comment #26)
Ok, I am working in a patch to it right now.
Thanks, please ping us on #fedora-{arm,ppc,s390x} if you'll need access to the
HW (no public s390x AFAIK).
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=866495
Glauber Costa glom...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=866495
--- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
vzctl-4.1-2.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/vzctl-4.1-2.fc17
--
You are receiving this mail
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=866495
--- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
vzctl-4.1-2.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/vzctl-4.1-2.fc18
--
You are receiving this mail
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=866495
Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|m...@zarb.org
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=866495
Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=866495
--- Comment #14 from Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com ---
I'll review it.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=866495
Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=866495
--- Comment #16 from Glauber Costa glom...@gmail.com ---
Before I posted this, rpmlint was already silent for me.
It still is, even after I upgrade it to F19's, grabbed from Koji.
I am not sure why this is the case =(
In any
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=866495
--- Comment #17 from Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com ---
You have a go already. You should continue from this:
* https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_SCM_admin_requests
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=866495
Glauber Costa glom...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=866495
--- Comment #18 from Glauber Costa glom...@gmail.com ---
New Package SCM Request
===
Package Name: vzctl
Short Description: utility that allows system administrators to control OpenVZ
containers
Owners: glauber
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=866495
--- Comment #19 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=866495
--- Comment #13 from Glauber Costa glom...@gmail.com ---
Hello, any further comments here ?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=866495
--- Comment #12 from Glauber Costa glom...@gmail.com ---
Hi.
OpenVZ just released a new version that makes the /vz path configurable, as
requested by Fedora. I changed it to /var/lib/vz, following what other packages
like libvirt does for their
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=866495
Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rc040...@freenet.de
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=866495
--- Comment #10 from Glauber Costa glom...@gmail.com ---
I believed this would only apply to packages already released, not in review
stage. Sorry.
I've updated the changelog now:
Spec URL: http://glommer.net/vzctl-fedora/vzctl.spec
SRPM URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=866495
--- Comment #11 from Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de ---
(In reply to comment #10)
I believed this would only apply to packages already released, not in review
stage. Sorry.
No, this also applies to packages under review, because this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=866495
--- Comment #4 from Glauber Costa glom...@gmail.com ---
Hello Michael, thank you very much.
Some questions:
1 ) Why would libxml2 be autodetected?
2 ) Note that I am not installing any initrd script. OpenVZ installs it because
it is needed when
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=866495
--- Comment #5 from Glauber Costa glom...@gmail.com ---
BTW, I believe I can get rid of the libxml dependency as well. Strictly
speaking, it is only used when a subpackage that I am not packaging here is
used.
I never tested, though. I will, and
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=866495
--- Comment #6 from Michael Scherer m...@zarb.org ---
1) because rpm detect the dynamic library used by various binary, using ldd. So
no need to explicitly add this one.
2) I think it may be better to remove in %install than adding lots of thing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=866495
--- Comment #7 from Glauber Costa glom...@gmail.com ---
Thanks Again, Michael,
I am already looking at using a prefix for that in upstream OpenVZ.
I'll publish a new version with your other comments merged shortly
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=866495
--- Comment #8 from Glauber Costa glom...@gmail.com ---
Hi,
I've pushed new versions of the files to their old location:
Spec URL: http://glommer.net/vzctl-fedora/vzctl.spec
SRPM URL: http://glommer.net/vzctl-fedora/vzctl-4.0-1.fc17.src.rpm
I
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=866495
Michael Scherer m...@zarb.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||m...@zarb.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=866495
Michael Scherer m...@zarb.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|m...@zarb.org
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=866495
Glauber Costa glom...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=866495
Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||lemen...@gmail.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=866495
Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On|177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) |
--- Comment #2 from
34 matches
Mail list logo
