https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=870049
Thomas Woerner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=870049
Gilles J. Seguin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||se...@videotron.ca
--- Comment #14 fr
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=870049
Kevin Kofler changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ke...@tigcc.ticalc.org
--- Comment #13 fr
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=870049
--- Comment #12 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=870049
Peter Lemenkov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=870049
Thomas Woerner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review+ |
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=870049
Peter Lemenkov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=870049
--- Comment #9 from Thomas Woerner ---
Ok, new spec and package in place:
http://twoerner.fedorapeople.org/Motif/motif.spec
http://twoerner.fedorapeople.org/Motif/motif-2.3.4-2.fc17.src.rpm
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=870049
Peter Lemenkov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||joc...@herr-schmitt.de
--- Comment #8 f
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=870049
--- Comment #7 from Peter Lemenkov ---
REVIEW:
Legend: + = PASSED, - = FAILED, 0 = Not Applicable
+ rpmlint is NOT silent (1290 warnings!) but almost all of these warnings are
about undefined macros in man-pages which isn't that harmful. You sh
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=870049
Peter Lemenkov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|nob...@fedo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=870049
--- Comment #5 from Thomas Woerner ---
O.k. new package is in place:
- new sub package for static libraries
- added /etc/X11/mwm directory
- removed defattrs
BTW: rpmlint is complaining on tags in man pages (warnings).
--
You are receiving t
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=870049
--- Comment #4 from Peter Lemenkov ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> We have had static libs in the package for RHEL since years, it might be
> used.
A very weak reasoning because there are bugs/issues in RHEL which are not fixed
for years. Maybe t
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=870049
--- Comment #3 from Thomas Woerner ---
We have had static libs in the package for RHEL since years, it might be used.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
pa
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=870049
--- Comment #2 from Peter Lemenkov ---
%defattr(-,root,root) should be removed - it's no longer needed.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review m
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=870049
--- Comment #1 from Peter Lemenkov ---
Why do we need to enable static libraries?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-re
16 matches
Mail list logo
