https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=871216
Eduardo Echeverria changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||echevemas...@gmail.com
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=871216
--- Comment #2 from Eduardo Echeverria ---
I forgot, please include a %doc section, and include files COPYING, README
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_create_an_RPM_package#.25files_section
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:LicensingG
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=871216
Gustav Gonzalez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR)
--
You are re
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=871216
Volker Fröhlich changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||volke...@gmx.at
--- Comment #3 from Vo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=871216
--- Comment #4 from Gustav Gonzalez ---
Hello guys! (Sorry for my delay)
I think the SPEC file is ready, but please, help me to ensure that everything
is ok.
http://www.maefloresta.com/fedora/tupi.spec
http://www.maefloresta.com/fedora/tupi-0.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=871216
--- Comment #5 from Volker Fröhlich ---
Make the build verbose!
As you are one of the developers, please try to remove the race conditions in
the build system, so multiple workers can be used.
Use name and version macros in Source0.
Every main
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=871216
--- Comment #6 from Volker Fröhlich ---
Tupi doesn't seem to build on PPC:
http://ppc.koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=774499&name=build.log
If you're not interested or able to mend that, you'd do the PPC guys a favour,
if you added
E
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=871216
--- Comment #7 from Volker Fröhlich ---
You need to install a desktop file, since this is a graphical application:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Desktop_files
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list f
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=871216
--- Comment #8 from Gustav Gonzalez ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> Make the build verbose!
I'm doing it now.
> As you are one of the developers, please try to remove the race conditions
> in the build system, so multiple workers can be used.
D
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=871216
--- Comment #9 from Gustav Gonzalez ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> You need to install a desktop file, since this is a graphical application:
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Desktop_files
Done.
--
You are receiving this ma
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=871216
--- Comment #10 from Gustav Gonzalez ---
Ok, this is how the thing is going on for now:
[xtingray@katana SPECS]$ rpmlint tupi.spec
0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
[xtingray@katana SRPMS]$ rpmlint tupi-0.2-1.fc17.src.r
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=871216
--- Comment #11 from Volker Fröhlich ---
No, I don't consider a manpage necessary for a graphical application.
The .so warning is about the libraries being unversioned, much like development
symlinks usually are. But those are just your private
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=871216
--- Comment #12 from Eduardo Echeverria ---
Gustav,
1.- Every time you make a change to the spec should increase the release number
(in the spec) but not in the source tarball
This will leave the changelog and Release tag in this way
Release:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=871216
--- Comment #13 from Gustav Gonzalez ---
(In reply to comment #11)
> Can you upload the newest spec and SRPM?
Same location :)
http://www.maefloresta.com/fedora/tupi.spec
http://www.maefloresta.com/fedora/tupi-0.2-1.fc17.src.rpm
--
You are r
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=871216
--- Comment #14 from Gustav Gonzalez ---
(In reply to comment #12)
> Gustav,
>
> 1.- Every time you make a change to the spec should increase the release
> number (in the spec) but not in the source tarball
>
> This will leave the changelog an
15 matches
Mail list logo
