Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=871216
--- Comment #27 from Gustav Gonzalez xting...@gmail.com ---
Please! I need some help with this issue...
When I run the rpmlint command for the RPM file, I got many messages like this:
tupi-debuginfo.x86_64: W: hidden-file-or-dir
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=871216
--- Comment #28 from Volker Fröhlich volke...@gmx.at ---
Ignore the rpmlint warning and don't delete the files.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=871216
--- Comment #29 from Kevin Kofler ke...@tigcc.ticalc.org ---
Yes, those files are automatically generated during build. And the fact that
they have hidden names is not an issue, that rpmlint warning is not a real
issue.
--
You
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=871216
--- Comment #30 from Gustav Gonzalez xting...@gmail.com ---
I did undo the changes in the SPEC file and rebuilt the SRPM again:
http://www.maefloresta.com/fedora/tupi.spec
http://www.maefloresta.com/fedora/tupi-0.2-3.fc17.src.rpm
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=871216
--- Comment #26 from Gustav Gonzalez xting...@gmail.com ---
Hi!
These are the latest versions of the SPEC/SRPM files. I hope all the errors
were fixed, but please check the files again and tell me if I forgot to correct
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=871216
--- Comment #21 from Volker Fröhlich volke...@gmx.at ---
I noticed the MIME types specified in the desktop file. Those are neither
registered at IANA, nor are they defined. You should define them and then use
the following
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=871216
--- Comment #22 from Gustav Gonzalez xting...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to comment #20)
The build still isn't verbose enough. You should see the exact compiler
command executed.
The configure script has an option --with-debug
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=871216
--- Comment #23 from Gustav Gonzalez xting...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to comment #21)
I noticed the MIME types specified in the desktop file. Those are neither
registered at IANA, nor are they defined. You should define them and
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=871216
--- Comment #24 from Eduardo Echeverria echevemas...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to comment #22)
(In reply to comment #20)
I still don't get the relationship between this and the spec file. Should I
change my code or what I have
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=871216
--- Comment #25 from Eduardo Echeverria echevemas...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to comment #23)
(In reply to comment #21)
Question: Should I install a XML file with the MIME information in the path
%{_datadir}/mime/packages,
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=871216
Gustav Gonzalez xting...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|rawhide |17
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=871216
--- Comment #19 from Gustav Gonzalez xting...@gmail.com ---
Report of my tests:
SPECS]$ rpmlint tupi.spec
0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
SRPMS]$ rpmlint tupi-0.2-1.fc17.src.rpm
1 packages and 0
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=871216
--- Comment #20 from Volker Fröhlich volke...@gmx.at ---
The build still isn't verbose enough. You should see the exact compiler command
executed.
The language handling isn't complete. While you're generating a list of locale
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=871216
Kevin Kofler ke...@tigcc.ticalc.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=871216
--- Comment #16 from Kevin Kofler ke...@tigcc.ticalc.org ---
ExcludeArch: ppc ppc64
rings a big alarm bell for me. How about you fix your code to be
endianness-safe instead?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=871216
--- Comment #17 from Gustav Gonzalez xting...@gmail.com ---
Don't worry, this weekend I will focus on the error related to the compilation
for ppc platforms. This fix requires some additional work but I will do it to
remove the
16 matches
Mail list logo
