https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=872783
Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=872783
--- Comment #55 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Complete.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=872783
Sébastien Boisvert s...@boisvert.info changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=872783
Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski domi...@greysector.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|505154 (FE-SCITECH) |
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=872783
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|Ray-2.1.0-6.el6
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=872783
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|Ray-2.1.0-6.fc18
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=872783
--- Comment #51 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
Ray-2.3.1-3.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/Ray-2.3.1-3.el6
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=872783
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|package-review@lists.fedora |
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=872783
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=872783
--- Comment #35 from Susi Lehtola susi.leht...@iki.fi ---
Any progress...?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=t7UrS4eJhva=cc_unsubscribe
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=872783
--- Comment #36 from Sébastien Boisvert s...@boisvert.info ---
I still don't see the cvs-flag.
I went on the fedora-admin IRC channel.
Matthias Runge (see above) verified that my email was the same in FAS and in
bugzilla.
I don't know what I
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=872783
--- Comment #37 from Sébastien Boisvert s...@boisvert.info ---
FranciscoD on #fedora-admin told me to fill a ticket. Here is my ticket:
https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/ticket/3891
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=872783
Sébastien Boisvert s...@boisvert.info changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=872783
Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=872783
--- Comment #39 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=872783
--- Comment #40 from Sébastien Boisvert s...@boisvert.info ---
Hi,
The git module: http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/Ray.git/
I successfully built the package for f18, f19 using fedpkg build.
fc18
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=872783
--- Comment #41 from Susi Lehtola susi.leht...@iki.fi ---
(In reply to Sébastien Boisvert from comment #40)
For el6, it fails for ppc64 because there is no package mpich2-devel:
DEBUG util.py:264: Error: No Package found for mpich2-devel
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=872783
--- Comment #42 from Sébastien Boisvert s...@boisvert.info ---
(In reply to Susi Lehtola from comment #41)
(In reply to Sébastien Boisvert from comment #40)
For el6, it fails for ppc64 because there is no package mpich2-devel:
DEBUG
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=872783
--- Comment #43 from Susi Lehtola susi.leht...@iki.fi ---
EL5? Sure. F17? Probably, but I'd really think twice - it's going to EOL anyway
in a month or so.
And yes, you have to do separate builds for every Fedora release. Even though
the sources
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=872783
--- Comment #44 from Susi Lehtola susi.leht...@iki.fi ---
(In reply to Sébastien Boisvert from comment #40)
Hi,
The git module: http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/Ray.git/
Btw, you don't have to report these anymore. When the review is
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=872783
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=872783
--- Comment #46 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
Ray-2.1.0-6.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/Ray-2.1.0-6.el6
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=872783
--- Comment #47 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
Ray-2.1.0-6.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/Ray-2.1.0-6.fc18
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=872783
--- Comment #45 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
Ray-2.1.0-6.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/Ray-2.1.0-6.fc19
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=872783
--- Comment #34 from Sébastien Boisvert s...@boisvert.info ---
Created attachment 757839
-- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=757839action=edit
These are the flags I see. I don't see the flag fedora-cvs.
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=872783
--- Comment #32 from Sébastien Boisvert s...@boisvert.info ---
(In reply to Matthias Runge from comment #31)
Sebastien, is the email-Address s...@boisvert.info the same as in fas?
Yes.
In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=872783
--- Comment #33 from Matthias Runge mru...@redhat.com ---
the cvs-Flag should be visible on the bottom of the header, near to Last
Closed and susi.lehtola: fedora-review. It may be necessary to click onto
(more flags).
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=872783
--- Comment #29 from Sébastien Boisvert s...@boisvert.info ---
According to the Fedora documentation [1], I need to be a member of the
fedorabugs group to change the value of the fedora-cvs flag. I guess I am not a
member of that group.
I'll ask
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=872783
--- Comment #30 from Sébastien Boisvert s...@boisvert.info ---
According to you and others [1], it may have something to do with a mismatch
between my bugzilla email address and my FAS email address. However, this is
unlikely the case as both are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=872783
--- Comment #31 from Matthias Runge mru...@redhat.com ---
Sebastien, is the email-Address s...@boisvert.info the same as in fas?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=872783
--- Comment #27 from Sébastien Boisvert s...@boisvert.info ---
Hello Susi,
Congratulation on your PhD defense. I will have mine this year, in December.
I am now at Step 7 (out of 15) in the new package process [1].
Here my SCM
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=872783
--- Comment #28 from Susi Lehtola susi.leht...@iki.fi ---
(In reply to comment #27)
Hello Susi,
Congratulation on your PhD defense. I will have mine this year, in December.
Great!
For the flag fedora‑cvs=?, I was not able
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=872783
Susi Lehtola susi.leht...@iki.fi changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=872783
--- Comment #25 from Sébastien Boisvert s...@boisvert.info ---
I reviewed bannergrab a few weeks ago.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=883125
I also commented on some review requests too:
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=872783
--- Comment #24 from Susi Lehtola susi.leht...@iki.fi ---
Oh, okay.
Please do a couple of informal reviews as requested in comment #9. The review
should look something like comment #12. There is a tool for automatizing many
of
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=872783
--- Comment #23 from Sébastien Boisvert s...@boisvert.info ---
Spec URL:
http://github.com/sebhtml/ray-packaging-for-Fedora/raw/2.1.0-5/Ray.spec
SRPM URL:
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=872783
--- Comment #21 from Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi ---
Well, that's up to you.
On the other hand, I'd think about the necessity of using help2man; writing man
pages is not that hard...
--
You are receiving this mail
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=872783
--- Comment #22 from Sébastien Boisvert s...@boisvert.info ---
Ray --help outputs almost a man page (with sections NAME, SYNOPSIS,
DESCRIPTION, FILES, DOCUMENTATION, AUTHOR, REPORTING BUGS, COPYRIGHT), but it
lacks the special
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=872783
--- Comment #20 from Sébastien Boisvert s...@boisvert.info ---
Should I remove the accents from my package since help2man has no nls support
in Fedora (see #873493) ?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=872783
Michael J Gruber m...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=872783
--- Comment #15 from Sébastien Boisvert s...@boisvert.info ---
Spec URL:
http://github.com/sebhtml/ray-packaging-for-Fedora/raw/2.1.0-4/Ray.spec
SRPM URL:
http://github.com/sebhtml/ray-packaging-for-Fedora/raw/2.1.0-4/Ray-2.1.0-4.fc17.src.rpm
A
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=872783
--- Comment #16 from Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi ---
(In reply to comment #15)
If I run help2man with --locale en_US.UTF-8, it fails with:
help2man: no locale support (Locale::gettext required)
Looks like you need to add
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=872783
--- Comment #17 from Sébastien Boisvert s...@boisvert.info ---
Looks like you need to add BuildRequires: perl-gettext.
It is already there in Ray.spec (2.1.0-4)
help2man in Koji:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=358087
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=872783
--- Comment #18 from Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi ---
(In reply to comment #17)
Looks like you need to add BuildRequires: perl-gettext.
It is already there in Ray.spec (2.1.0-4)
That's true.
help2man in Koji:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=872783
--- Comment #19 from Sébastien Boisvert s...@boisvert.info ---
Looks like you should file a bug against help2man and ask the maintainer to
turn on nls support.
Bug # 873493
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=872783
--- Comment #9 from Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi ---
The package does not build in mock. You're missing BuildRequires: help2man.
And even after that I get
+ help2man --no-info -n 'assemble genomes in parallel using the message-passing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=872783
--- Comment #10 from Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi ---
Please increment the Release every time you make changes to the spec file, also
during the review! Otherwise it's very hard to follow reviews.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=872783
--- Comment #11 from Sébastien Boisvert s...@boisvert.info ---
Spec URL:
https://raw.github.com/sebhtml/ray-packaging-for-Fedora/for-review/ray-2.1.0-2/2.1.0/ray.spec
SRPM URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=872783
Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=872783
--- Comment #13 from Sébastien Boisvert s...@boisvert.info ---
Spec URL:
http://github.com/sebhtml/ray-packaging-for-Fedora/raw/2.1.0-3/Ray.spec
SRPM URL:
http://github.com/sebhtml/ray-packaging-for-Fedora/raw/2.1.0-3/Ray-2.1.0-3.fc17.src.rpm
*
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=872783
Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jussi.leht...@iki.fi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=872783
--- Comment #4 from Sébastien Boisvert s...@boisvert.info ---
Thanks!
I implemented all changes:
Spec URL:
https://raw.github.com/sebhtml/ray-packaging-for-Fedora/3d677e7b1e98afa89f3a8ab0fc546c3b39b47e6d/2.1.0/ray.spec
SRPM URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=872783
--- Comment #5 from Sébastien Boisvert s...@boisvert.info ---
*** Bug 872782 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=872783
--- Comment #6 from Sébastien Boisvert s...@boisvert.info ---
Hello,
After reading Fedora guidelines:
- Removed symbols that are not U.S. American English from man page
- Added Fedora compilation flags (optflags)
Spec URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=872783
--- Comment #7 from Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi ---
Your CXXFLAGS declaration is rather long, please split it on more lines.
Note that you can replace
cat Ray.1.man|sed 's/Erdős.*Rényi/Erdos-Renyi/g' | sed 's/é/e/g' | sed
's/É/E/g' | sed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=872783
--- Comment #8 from Sébastien Boisvert s...@boisvert.info ---
Spec URL:
https://github.com/sebhtml/ray-packaging-for-Fedora/raw/68f23d20512012ace420bfdd3d69c557b5e93cf1/2.1.0/ray.spec
SRPM URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=872783
--- Comment #1 from Sébastien Boisvert s...@boisvert.info ---
\see http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/scitech/2012-November/000148.html
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=872783
Sébastien Boisvert s...@boisvert.info changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=872783
Sébastien Boisvert s...@boisvert.info changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||505154
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=872783
--- Comment #2 from Sébastien Boisvert s...@boisvert.info ---
The spec file generates 3 packages: ray, ray-doc and ray-extra.
rpmlint reports nothing bad:
$ rpmlint ray.spec
0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
I tested
60 matches
Mail list logo
