https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=874689
Benson Muite changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||benson_mu...@emailplus.org
--- Comment
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=874689
--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System ---
v8-3.14.5.8-1.fc18, nodejs-0.10.2-1.fc18, libuv-0.10.3-1.fc18 has been pushed
to the Fedora 18 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make
note of it in this bug report.
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=874689
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |ERRATA
--
You ar
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=874689
--- Comment #14 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=b9O8aMDBtj&a=
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=874689
--- Comment #13 from Stephen Gallagher ---
Package Change Request
==
Package Name: libuv
New Branches: el6
Owners: sgallagh patches
InitialCC:
Correcting the request
--
You are receiving this mail because:
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=874689
Stephen Gallagher changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs+ |
Flags|
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=874689
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System ---
nodejs-0.9.3-7.fc18,libuv-0.9.3-0.3.git09b0222.fc18 has been submitted as an
update for Fedora 18.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/nodejs-0.9.3-7.fc18,libuv-0.9.3-0.3.git09b022
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=874689
--- Comment #10 from Orion Poplawski ---
I'm looking at it for julia, but since julia also requires bleeding edge
suitesparse which is only in rawhide, I'm fine with libuv not being elsewhere
yet.
--
You are receiving this mail
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=874689
--- Comment #9 from Stephen Gallagher ---
I don't have plans for F17 or EPEL 6 at this time. The reason for this is that
libuv is pretty much only usable with Node.js at this time. The Node.js package
undergoing review requires Op
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=874689
--- Comment #8 from Orion Poplawski ---
Also, this builds on el6 and would be nice to have there.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
packag
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=874689
Orion Poplawski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||or...@cora.nwra.com
--
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=874689
Stephen Gallagher changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Resol
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=874689
--- Comment #6 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
packa
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=874689
Stephen Gallagher changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comm
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=874689
Matthias Runge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |
Flags|nee
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=874689
Stephen Gallagher changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||needinfo?(mru...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=874689
--- Comment #2 from Matthias Runge ---
Package Review
==
Key:
[x] = Pass
[!] = Fail
[-] = Not applicable
[?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
Issues:
===
[!]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
Note:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=874689
Matthias Runge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=874689
Stephen Gallagher changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||815018
--
You are receiving this ma
19 matches
Mail list logo
