https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=875087
Paul Cochrane p...@liekut.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(p...@liekut.de) |
--- Comment #31 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=875087
Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=875087
Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|POST
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=875087
Paul Cochrane p...@liekut.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(p...@liekut.de) |
--- Comment #29 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=875087
--- Comment #30 from Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com ---
You're package has been approved, so presumably you want to file a new package
SCM request:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_SCM_admin_requests#New_Packages and
build it.
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=875087
Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=875087
--- Comment #26 from Paul Cochrane p...@liekut.de ---
(In reply to Orion Poplawski from comment #25)
- You didn't bump release and add a new changelog entry for these changes.
I guess this hasn't be explicit, but I want it for any change to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=875087
Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=875087
--- Comment #24 from Paul Cochrane p...@liekut.de ---
(In reply to Orion Poplawski from comment #21)
Hi Orion,
I've addressed the points you raised in Comment #21.
The SRCRPM, SPEC and distribution tarball are at the usual location:
-
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=875087
--- Comment #25 from Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com ---
- You didn't bump release and add a new changelog entry for these changes. I
guess this hasn't be explicit, but I want it for any change to the spec.
- You only need to run
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=875087
Paul Cochrane p...@liekut.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo? |
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=875087
--- Comment #23 from Paul Cochrane p...@liekut.de ---
(In reply to Paul Cochrane from comment #22)
(In reply to Orion Poplawski from comment #21)
- cluster_status (and perhaps even gen_nodes_file) is too generic. Please
add a pbs (or
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=875087
Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||needinfo?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=875087
--- Comment #21 from Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
Issues:
===
- Package contains BR:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=875087
--- Comment #18 from Paul Cochrane p...@liekut.de ---
warning: bogus date in %changelog: Fri Nov 7 2013 Paul Cochrane
p...@liekut.de 0.7-4
Now corrected in current version.
Use:
%{python_sitelib}/pbsclusterviz-*.egg-info
Also corrected.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=875087
--- Comment #19 from Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com ---
Python 3 is optional still at this point, but be aware that we are targeting
python 3 to be the default for F22, so the earlier the better:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=875087
--- Comment #20 from Paul Cochrane p...@liekut.de ---
Post updated links when you are ready.
The SRCRPM, source tarball and spec files (for the Python 2.x version) are at
the following locations:
-
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=875087
--- Comment #17 from Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com ---
warning: bogus date in %changelog: Fri Nov 7 2013 Paul Cochrane
p...@liekut.de 0.7-4
Use:
%{python_sitelib}/pbsclusterviz-*.egg-info
so this works with different versions of python.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=875087
--- Comment #16 from Paul Cochrane p...@liekut.de ---
No need to bump release for this, but I need to be working with a src.rpm
and a spec file that are in sync. Perhaps you just haven't regenerated the
src.rpm?
Perhaps I forgot to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=875087
--- Comment #14 from Paul Cochrane p...@liekut.de ---
(In reply to Orion Poplawski from comment #13)
Source url in spec still seems wrong:
The URL should now be correct. I've uploaded a tarball from python
setup.py bdist and this works after
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=875087
--- Comment #15 from Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com ---
The Source0 url in the src.rpm spec is still wrong:
Getting
https://api.github.com/repos/paultcochrane/pbsclusterviz/pbsclusterviz-0.7a.tar.gz
to ./pbsclusterviz-0.7a.tar.gz
%
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=875087
--- Comment #10 from Paul Cochrane p...@liekut.de ---
(In reply to Orion Poplawski from comment #8)
First issue: error: %changelog not in descending chronological order
Corrected in commit 0567dd6d62c90738530c00322c6c692a6f7afe8f of
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=875087
--- Comment #11 from Paul Cochrane p...@liekut.de ---
Hi Orion,
(In reply to Orion Poplawski from comment #9)
Also doesn't build:
RPM build errors:
error: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=875087
--- Comment #12 from Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com ---
Please publish URLs to the raw files and to src.rpm files.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=875087
--- Comment #13 from Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com ---
Source url in spec still seems wrong:
spectool -g *spec
Getting
https://github.com/paultcochrane/pbsclusterviz/archive/pbsclusterviz-0.7a-4.fc19.tar.gz
to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=875087
--- Comment #8 from Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com ---
First issue: error: %changelog not in descending chronological order
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=875087
Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) |
--- Comment #9
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=875087
Paul Cochrane p...@liekut.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(p...@liekut.de) |
--- Comment #7 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=875087
Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=875087
Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=875087
Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=875087
--- Comment #4 from Paul Cochrane paultcochr...@gmail.com ---
Hi Veaceslav,
Staled Bug Request. @Paul Cochrane i hope you are still interested to
finish this one.
yes I am. I still need someone to sponsor this package request though.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=875087
--- Comment #5 from Veaceslav Mindru mind...@gmail.com ---
Hello Paul,
i am a novice here just as you are , so i don't think i can answer those
questions.
Sorry, I don't know what you mean here. root should own the files, right?
How do
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=875087
Veaceslav Mindru mind...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mind...@gmail.com
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=875087
--- Comment #2 from Paul Cochrane paultcochr...@gmail.com ---
Hi Volker,
many thanks for your comments! I've changed as many things as I could and have
uploaded the latest spec file and SRPM to the following URLs:
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=875087
Volker Fröhlich volke...@gmx.at changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
36 matches
Mail list logo
