Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=876865
--- Comment #11 from Terje Røsten terje...@phys.ntnu.no ---
Done. I assume the wildcard is to accommodate future, additional manpages,
so why not '%{_mandir}/man*/brewtarget*' ?
No, rpmbuild will compress all man pages and
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=876865
--- Comment #12 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Summary and SCM request package names don't match, please correct.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=876865
Pete Travis m...@petetravis.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Review Request: Brewtarget |Review
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=876865
--- Comment #13 from Pete Travis m...@petetravis.com ---
New Package SCM Request
===
Package Name: brewtarget
Short Description: An open source beer recipe creation tool
Owners: immanetize
Branches: f16 f17
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=876865
Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On|177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) |
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=876865
Pete Travis m...@petetravis.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=876865
--- Comment #10 from Pete Travis m...@petetravis.com ---
snip
Issues:
1. Might ask upstream to include a copy of LGPL? (not a blocker)
2. rpmlint says:
brewtarget.i686: W: spurious-executable-perm
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=876865
--- Comment #4 from Pete Travis m...@petetravis.com ---
(In reply to comment #2)
Some more:
* use %{version} in source url
This seems a bit excessive. It would break validation tools, and require users
trying to download the
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=876865
--- Comment #5 from Terje Røsten terje...@phys.ntnu.no ---
Thanks for updates!
Some more:
rpmlint issues:
brewtarget.x86_64: W: invalid-license WTFPLv2
brewtarget.x86_64: W: invalid-license LGPLv2.1
According to
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=876865
--- Comment #6 from Pete Travis m...@petetravis.com ---
(In reply to comment #5)
Thanks for updates!
Some more:
rpmlint issues:
brewtarget.x86_64: W: invalid-license WTFPLv2
brewtarget.x86_64: W: invalid-license
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=876865
Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=876865
Terje Røsten terje...@phys.ntnu.no changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=876865
--- Comment #2 from Terje Røsten terje...@phys.ntnu.no ---
Some more:
* use %{version} in source url
* ctest don't seems to do anything useful, remove
* no need for %{_docdir}/%{name}-%{version} in %files
* app seems to ship
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=876865
--- Comment #3 from Pete Travis m...@petetravis.com ---
(In reply to comment #1)
Some comments:
* I am confused by your release tag usage, why the rc prefix and why not
increase on update?
Please consult:
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=876865
Pete Travis m...@petetravis.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||177841
15 matches
Mail list logo
