Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=886112
lennart.fri...@kabelmail.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||177841 (FE-N
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=886112
Peter Lemenkov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||201449 (FE-DEADREVIEW)
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=886112
Michael Scherer changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||m...@zarb.org
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=886112
--- Comment #2 from Michael Schwendt ---
Just some comments (no review of the spec file):
I recommend that not much attention is paid to the old review request bug
187294 anymore. Not because that has been several years ago, but
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=886112
--- Comment #3 from Michael Schwendt ---
$ gwyddion
gwyddion: Symbol `fftw_version' has different size in shared object, consider
re-linking
(gwyddion:26454): Module-WARNING **: Cannot add non-existent path
'/usr/share/gwyddion/p
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=886112
--- Comment #4 from lennart.fri...@kabelmail.de ---
Spec URL:
https://raw.github.com/lennart0901/gwyddion-fedpack/master/gwyddion.spec
SRPM URL:
https://raw.github.com/lennart0901/gwyddion-fedpack/master/gwyddion-2.30-3.src.rpm
Ab
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=886112
--- Comment #5 from Michael Schwendt ---
> Now about the plugin-module packages:
>
> In the original software distribution, those are installed in
> /usr/lib/gwyddion/{perl,python,ruby}.
Here the test-build on x86_64 installed
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=886112
--- Comment #6 from David Nečas ---
If I knew how much grief the plug-in system would create
I will try to clarify one point: The plug-in system is ill-conceived but real
people use it and depend on it; we care about compatib
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=886112
--- Comment #7 from Michael Schwendt ---
> much grief
More like going in circles, also due to misunderstandings, IMO. In the old
review in bug 187294 comment 26 it was said:
| not having the modules as regular modules isn't a bl
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=886112
--- Comment #8 from David Nečas ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> If an external Gwyddion plug-in written in Perl were to be packaged...
I promise to rewrite personally the thing to C or pygwy in such case. Or just
package the thre
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=886112
--- Comment #9 from Michael Schwendt ---
I'm not worried. I don't suggest putting the stuff into standard search path.
;)
And gtk2? Hey! :) Check this out:
$ yum list gtk+|grep ^g
gtk+.i686 1:1.2.10-73.fc
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=886112
--- Comment #10 from David Nečas ---
(In reply to comment #9)
> gtk+.i686 1:1.2.10-73.fc18 fedora
> gtk+.x86_64 1:1.2.10-73.fc18 fedora
That's what I meant.
--
You are r
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=886112
--- Comment #11 from lennart.fri...@kabelmail.de ---
Spec URL:
https://raw.github.com/lennart0901/gwyddion-fedpack/master/gwyddion.spec
SRPM URL:
https://raw.github.com/lennart0901/gwyddion-fedpack/master/gwyddion-2.30-4.src.rpm
I
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=886112
lenn...@die-frickes.eu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(lennart@die-frick |
|es.eu)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=886112
Jan Kalina changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=886112
--- Comment #16 from David Nečas ---
Well, we've been providing Fedora packages ourselves for a dozen of years --
and a repo since 2011. Unlike some software du jour which goes from ‘everyone
should use this’ to ‘deprecated’ in a couple of yea
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=886112
Jan Kalina changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jkal...@redhat.com
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=886112
Christopher Meng changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||i...@cicku.me
--- Comment #12 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=886112
--- Comment #13 from lenn...@die-frickes.eu ---
Well I'm, but it still needs a reviewer or even better co-maintainer.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this pro
19 matches
Mail list logo
