https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=893566
--- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
tagainijisho-1.0.3-1.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable
repository.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=893566
--- Comment #17 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=893566
--- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
tagainijisho-1.0.3-1.el7 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 7.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/tagainijisho-1.0.3-1.el7
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=893566
Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=893566
Martin Sourada martin.sour...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs?
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=893566
--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
tagainijisho-0.9.4-5.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 stable repository.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=893566
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=893566
--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
tagainijisho-0.9.4-5.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 stable repository.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=893566
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=893566
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
tagainijisho-0.9.4-4.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/tagainijisho-0.9.4-4.fc18
--
You are
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=893566
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
tagainijisho-0.9.4-4.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/tagainijisho-0.9.4-4.fc17
--
You are
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=893566
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=893566
--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
tagainijisho-0.9.4-4.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 testing repository.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=893566
--- Comment #7 from Martin Sourada martin.sour...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to comment #6)
[!]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
Note: Source1 and Source2 are not needed.
Yes. Removed.
*
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=893566
Robin Lee robinlee.s...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=893566
Martin Sourada martin.sour...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=893566
--- Comment #10 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=893566
--- Comment #4 from Robin Lee robinlee.s...@gmail.com ---
Package Review
==
Key:
[x] = Pass
[!] = Fail
[-] = Not applicable
[?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
C/C++:
[x]: Header
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=893566
--- Comment #5 from Martin Sourada martin.sour...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to comment #4)
[!]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
Note: rm -rf %{buildroot}
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=893566
--- Comment #6 from Robin Lee robinlee.s...@gmail.com ---
[!]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
Note: Source1 and Source2 are not needed.
* If all the 'CC-BY-SA' data is moved to
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=893566
--- Comment #3 from Martin Sourada martin.sour...@gmail.com ---
Thanks for picking it up. I've added the BRs and removed (in prep section) the
bundled sqlite. This time to be sure I haven't missed any BRs I ran a scratch
build:
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=893566
Robin Lee robinlee.s...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=893566
--- Comment #1 from Martin Sourada martin.sour...@gmail.com ---
Dictionaries are split by language into sub-packages, at least one needs to be
present, so I use virtual provides for them. As for rpmlint output:
tagainijisho.i686:
23 matches
Mail list logo
