[Bug 902024] Review Request: gdk-pixbuf-psd - GdkPixbuf loader for the PSD file format

2021-08-11 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=902024 Mamoru TASAKA changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |WONTFIX Status|NEW

[Bug 902024] Review Request: gdk-pixbuf-psd - GdkPixbuf loader for the PSD file format

2021-08-11 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=902024 Mamoru TASAKA changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|needinfo?(mtasaka@fedorapro | |ject.org)

[Bug 902024] Review Request: gdk-pixbuf-psd - GdkPixbuf loader for the PSD file format

2021-08-03 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=902024 Mattia Verga changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW Assignee|kwiz...@gmail.com

[Bug 902024] Review Request: gdk-pixbuf-psd - GdkPixbuf loader for the PSD file format

2020-07-27 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=902024 Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? needinfo+|fedora-review+ --- Comment

needinfo granted: [Bug 902024] Review Request: gdk-pixbuf-psd - GdkPixbuf loader for the PSD file format

2020-07-27 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) has granted Package Review 's request for Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 's needinfo: Bug 902024: Review Request: gdk-pixbuf-psd - GdkPixbuf loader for the PSD file format https://bugzilla.redhat.com/sh

[Bug 902024] Review Request: gdk-pixbuf-psd - GdkPixbuf loader for the PSD file format

2020-07-27 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=902024 Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|needinfo?(kwiz...@gmail.com |needinfo+

[Bug 902024] Review Request: gdk-pixbuf-psd - GdkPixbuf loader for the PSD file format

2016-04-10 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=902024 --- Comment #21 from Luya Tshimbalanga --- Any update about the package? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _

[Bug 902024] Review Request: gdk-pixbuf-psd - GdkPixbuf loader for the PSD file format

2013-08-30 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=902024 Luya Tshimbalanga changed: What|Removed |Added CC||l...@fedoraproject.org B

[Bug 902024] Review Request: gdk-pixbuf-psd - GdkPixbuf loader for the PSD file format

2013-04-18 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=902024 --- Comment #20 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) --- Done a new scratch build for f18: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=5270698 This time it worked on my fc18 x86_64 running an intel core 2 duo CPU. I will try to

[Bug 902024] Review Request: gdk-pixbuf-psd - GdkPixbuf loader for the PSD file format

2013-04-09 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=902024 --- Comment #19 from Mamoru TASAKA --- $ ls -al /usr/share/thumbnailers 合計 36 drwxr-xr-x2 root root 4096 4月 7 18:20 . drwxr-xr-x. 529 root root 20480 4月 7 23:32 .. -rw-r--r--1 root root 490 3月 27 03:05 evince.thumb

[Bug 902024] Review Request: gdk-pixbuf-psd - GdkPixbuf loader for the PSD file format

2013-04-09 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=902024 --- Comment #18 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) --- Same problem. I cannot generate psd thumbnails on f17 x86_64 phenom CPU For info, which files do you have in /usr/share/thumbnailers ? I will try to grab some debug enviroment f

[Bug 902024] Review Request: gdk-pixbuf-psd - GdkPixbuf loader for the PSD file format

2013-04-07 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=902024 --- Comment #17 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) --- el6 doesn't have the necessary libraries to test easily. But I can confirm that using this library breaks a working system. When I was testing with this library installed, anothe

[Bug 902024] Review Request: gdk-pixbuf-psd - GdkPixbuf loader for the PSD file format

2013-03-29 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=902024 --- Comment #16 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) --- I will try to reproduce on el6 (I was using fc17). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat

[Bug 902024] Review Request: gdk-pixbuf-psd - GdkPixbuf loader for the PSD file format

2013-03-29 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=902024 --- Comment #15 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) --- I still cannot get the thumbnail from a cold boot after the psd files were moved into a new directory. That's either with nautilus/pcmanfm, there is no thumbnail browsing the new

[Bug 902024] Review Request: gdk-pixbuf-psd - GdkPixbuf loader for the PSD file format

2013-03-28 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=902024 --- Comment #14 from Mamoru TASAKA --- What happens if you restart nautilus or so? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=if

[Bug 902024] Review Request: gdk-pixbuf-psd - GdkPixbuf loader for the PSD file format

2013-03-24 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=902024 --- Comment #13 from Mamoru TASAKA --- I sent a mail to you privately. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=1RnL4XjFo5&a=c

[Bug 902024] Review Request: gdk-pixbuf-psd - GdkPixbuf loader for the PSD file format

2013-03-24 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=902024 --- Comment #12 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) --- I Can reproduce the issue with gnome-nautilus or pcmanfm. Tested with 3 cases: - sample psd file taken from the internet - psd file exported from gimp - png file of the same pictu

[Bug 902024] Review Request: gdk-pixbuf-psd - GdkPixbuf loader for the PSD file format

2013-03-23 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=902024 --- Comment #11 from Mamoru TASAKA --- By the way, would you clarify what is the left blocker currently? Your comment 9 means that I have to check if the issue you see is due to nautilus side or not? -- You are receiving this ma

[Bug 902024] Review Request: gdk-pixbuf-psd - GdkPixbuf loader for the PSD file format

2013-03-22 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=902024 --- Comment #10 from Mamoru TASAKA --- Well, I no longer use nautilus (actually I've removed nautilus rpm) so currently I cannot check it (for now). I tried pcmanfm and it seems to be working. -- You are receiving this mail beca

[Bug 902024] Review Request: gdk-pixbuf-psd - GdkPixbuf loader for the PSD file format

2013-03-22 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=902024 --- Comment #9 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) --- Well, I'm not sure to understand how to test using gnome-nautilus If I open the directory using gimp, the thumbnail is generated and shown in nautilus. But if I move the .psd file

[Bug 902024] Review Request: gdk-pixbuf-psd - GdkPixbuf loader for the PSD file format

2013-03-22 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=902024 --- Comment #8 from Mamoru TASAKA --- ping? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=NR5FR5XsCt&a=cc_unsubscribe _

[Bug 902024] Review Request: gdk-pixbuf-psd - GdkPixbuf loader for the PSD file format

2013-03-13 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=902024 --- Comment #7 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) --- Package Review == Key: [x] = Pass [!] = Fail [-] = Not applicable [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed = MUST items = C/C++: [x]: Development (un

[Bug 902024] Review Request: gdk-pixbuf-psd - GdkPixbuf loader for the PSD file format

2013-03-01 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=902024 Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug 902024] Review Request: gdk-pixbuf-psd - GdkPixbuf loader for the PSD file format

2013-01-21 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=902024 --- Comment #5 from Mamoru TASAKA --- (In reply to comment #4) > > > - RLE compression > > Spec mentions: 0 = Raw Data, 1 = RLE compressed, 2 = ZIP without prediction, > > 3 = ZIP with prediction > gimp does not support 2 and 3,

[Bug 902024] Review Request: gdk-pixbuf-psd - GdkPixbuf loader for the PSD file format

2013-01-21 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=902024 --- Comment #4 from Mamoru TASAKA --- (In reply to comment #3) > The primary reason why I've searched a bit about this is that PSD is (or > used to be?) a proprietary and undocumented file format. .. Fedora already has PSD suppo

[Bug 902024] Review Request: gdk-pixbuf-psd - GdkPixbuf loader for the PSD file format

2013-01-21 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=902024 --- Comment #3 from Michael Schwendt --- The primary reason why I've searched a bit about this is that PSD is (or used to be?) a proprietary and undocumented file format. I wanted to learn how much of this is "open", legal and not

[Bug 902024] Review Request: gdk-pixbuf-psd - GdkPixbuf loader for the PSD file format

2013-01-20 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=902024 --- Comment #2 from Mamoru TASAKA --- If some file format is not recognized, I will report it upstream. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redh

[Bug 902024] Review Request: gdk-pixbuf-psd - GdkPixbuf loader for the PSD file format

2013-01-20 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=902024 --- Comment #1 from Michael Schwendt --- > README The more recent file format documentation from Adobe seems to be more complex due to Photoshop >= 4.0: http://www.adobe.com/devnet-apps/photoshop/fileformatashtml/ -- You are re