Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=902503
--- Comment #1 from Troy Dawson ---
RPMLINT Output:
rpmlint rubygem-httpclient-2.3.2-2.fc18.src.rpm
rubygem-httpclient-2.3.2-2.fc18.noarch.rpm
rubygem-httpclient-doc-2.3.2-2.fc18.noarch.rpm
3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 er
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=902503
Michael Scherer changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||m...@zarb.org
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=902503
--- Comment #2 from Michael Scherer ---
A few remark :
- %%doc %{gem_instdir}/README.txt
why a %% instead of % ?
- URL:http://devcentral.f5.com/
The url seems wrong
- there is no license shipped
- Licensing is wro
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=902503
--- Comment #3 from Troy Dawson ---
Spec URL:
http://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/openshift-origin/rubygem-httpclient.spec
SRPM URL:
http://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/openshift-origin/rubygem-httpclient-2.3.2-3.fc18.src.rpm
- %%doc
--
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=902503
Guillermo Gómez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||guillermo.go...@gmail.c
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=902503
--- Comment #5 from Michael Scherer ---
Well, ruby is under the following license :
License : (Ruby or BSD) and Public Domain
So I do not see where does the GPL v2 come from, as http-access was first
without license, then und
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=902503
--- Comment #6 from Michael Scherer ---
Package Review
==
Key:
[x] = Pass
[!] = Fail
[-] = Not applicable
[?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
Issues:
===
[!]: If the package is under multiple license
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=902503
Troy Dawson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #7 fr
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=902503
Michael Scherer changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |
Flags|
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=902503
Troy Dawson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #9
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=902503
--- Comment #10 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=bzvNCuJKqI&a=
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=902503
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--
You
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=902503
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System ---
rubygem-httpclient-2.3.2-4.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rubygem-httpclient-2.3.2-4.fc18
--
You are receiving this mail
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=902503
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--
You are
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=902503
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System ---
rubygem-httpclient-2.3.2-4.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 testing
repository.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=902503
--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System ---
rubygem-httpclient-2.3.2-4.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 stable
repository.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=902503
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Re
17 matches
Mail list logo
