Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=906481
--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System ---
erlang-cowboy-0.8.2-4.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 stable repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail b
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=906481
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|RAWHIDE |ERRATA
--
You ar
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=906481
Peter Lemenkov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED
Resoluti
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=906481
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System ---
erlang-cowboy-0.8.2-4.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/erlang-cowboy-0.8.2-4.fc18
--
You are receiving this mail because:
Y
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=906481
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |MODIFIED
--
You
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=906481
--- Comment #11 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=Wr8WmEw0HR&a=
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=906481
Peter Lemenkov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=906481
Jos de Kloe changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review+
--- Comment
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=906481
--- Comment #8 from Peter Lemenkov ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> I guess removing the %{?_isa} in the Requires lines of the doc section
> may solve this?
Yes, definitely! New package and spec-file:
* http://peter.fedorapeople.
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=906481
--- Comment #7 from Jos de Kloe ---
Thanks Peter for removing this one example from the doc package.
fedora-review -b 906481 -m fedora-18-x86_64
runs fine now, and I am happy with its output. No new issues are found here.
The to
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=906481
--- Comment #6 from Peter Lemenkov ---
Thanks for digging into this, Jos!
Here is a new spec ans srpm:
* http://peter.fedorapeople.org/erlyvideo/erlang-cowboy.spec
* http://peter.fedorapeople.org/erlyvideo/erlang-cowboy-0.8.2-3.
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=906481
--- Comment #5 from Jos de Kloe ---
Thanks for your new version.
I retested with the fedora-review tool, and all mentioned points are fixed now,
but I found a few new issues:
The fedora-review tool now gives these extra items:
[
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=906481
--- Comment #4 from Peter Lemenkov ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> Package Review
> ==
>
> Key:
> [x] = Pass
> [!] = Fail
> [-] = Not applicable
> [?] = Not evaluated
> [ ] = Manual review needed
>
>
> Issues:
>
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=906481
--- Comment #3 from Jos de Kloe ---
Package Review
==
Key:
[x] = Pass
[!] = Fail
[-] = Not applicable
[?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
Issues:
===
- Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=906481
--- Comment #2 from Peter Lemenkov ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> This package builds fine.
> The rpmlint results show an error and 2 warnings.
>
> Rpmlint
> ---
> Checking: erlang-cowboy-0.6.1-1.fc18.x86_64.rpm
> erlang-cowb
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=906481
Jos de Kloe changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||josdek...@gmail.com
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=906481
Peter Lemenkov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||918587
--
You are rece
17 matches
Mail list logo
