https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=913289
Peter Hanecak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=913289
--- Comment #45 from Fedora Update System ---
gimp-separate+-0.5.8-9.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gimp-separate+-0.5.8-9.el6
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are alw
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=913289
--- Comment #46 from Fedora Update System ---
gimp-separate+-0.5.8-9.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gimp-separate+-0.5.8-9.fc18
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are alway
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=913289
--- Comment #47 from Fedora Update System ---
gimp-separate+-0.5.8-9.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gimp-separate+-0.5.8-9.fc19
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are alway
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=913289
--- Comment #48 from Fedora Update System ---
gimp-separate+-0.5.8-10.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gimp-separate+-0.5.8-10.el6
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=913289
--- Comment #49 from Fedora Update System ---
gimp-separate+-0.5.8-10.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gimp-separate+-0.5.8-10.fc18
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are alw
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=913289
--- Comment #50 from Fedora Update System ---
gimp-separate+-0.5.8-10.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gimp-separate+-0.5.8-10.fc19
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are alw
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=913289
--- Comment #51 from Fedora Update System ---
gimp-separate+-0.5.8-10.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gimp-separate+-0.5.8-10.fc20
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are alw
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=913289
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version||gimp-separate+-0.5.8-10.el6
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=913289
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|gimp-separate+-0.5.8-10.el6 |gimp-separate+-0.5.8-10.fc1
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=913289
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|gimp-separate+-0.5.8-10.fc1 |gimp-separate+-0.5.8-10.fc2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=913289
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|gimp-separate+-0.5.8-10.fc2 |gimp-separate+-0.5.8-10.fc1
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=913289
Christopher Meng changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||cicku...@gmail.com,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=913289
Peter Hanecak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(h...@hany.sk) |
--- Comment #13 from Peter Hanecak -
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=913289
--- Comment #14 from Peter Hanecak ---
(Correcting unfinished sentence from comment #13)
> I was not able to confirm whether adding version is the right thing. See for
> example https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=751119#c4 where same
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=913289
--- Comment #15 from Michael Schwendt ---
> unversioned-explicit-provides
This is the explanation from "rpmlint -I …":
| The specfile contains an unversioned Provides: token, which will
| match all older, equal, and newer versions of the prov
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=913289
--- Comment #16 from Michael Schwendt ---
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Common_Rpmlint_issues
[ https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Category:Package_Maintainers ]
That doesn't cover unversioned-explicit-provides though.
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=913289
--- Comment #17 from Peter Hanecak ---
(In reply to Michael Schwendt from comment #15)
> > unversioned-explicit-provides
>
> This is the explanation from "rpmlint -I …":
>
> | The specfile contains an unversioned Provides: token, which will
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=913289
--- Comment #18 from Christopher Meng ---
I think you didn't want to support EL5, right?
Because as said in homepage:
"the GIMP 2.4 or later (2.2.x support was discontinued since 0.5.4)"
So please remove BuildRoot tag/%clean section/%defatt
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=913289
--- Comment #19 from Peter Hanecak ---
(In reply to Christopher Meng from comment #18)
> I think you didn't want to support EL5, right?
>
> Because as said in homepage:
>
> "the GIMP 2.4 or later (2.2.x support was discontinued since 0.5.4)"
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=913289
--- Comment #20 from Christopher Meng ---
Ok, I'll leave other issues to Luya, can he sponsor you?
Hope you can get sponsored soon and bring more gimp plugin into Fedora.
Cheers.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC lis
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=913289
Christopher Meng changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||needinfo?(luya@fedoraprojec
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=913289
Luya Tshimbalanga changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(luya@fedoraprojec |
|t.org)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=913289
Matthias Runge changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mru...@redhat.com
--- Comment #22 fro
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=913289
--- Comment #23 from Luya Tshimbalanga ---
(In reply to Matthias Runge from comment #22)
> Sadly, your package does not build on rawhide.
>
> DEBUG util.py:264: --> pango-devel-1.35.0-2.fc20.x86_64
> DEBUG util.py:264: Error: libpng12-devel
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=913289
Dan Horák changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|package-review@lists.fedora |
|project.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=913289
Peter Hanecak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review+ |fedora-review?
--- Comment #40 from Pe
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=913289
Peter Hanecak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #41 from Peter
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=913289
Dan Horák changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #42 from Dan Ho
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=913289
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You are receiving this ma
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=913289
--- Comment #43 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=913289
Peter Hanecak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR)
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=913289
Antonio Trande changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||trp...@katamail.com
---
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=913289
--- Comment #2 from Peter Hanecak ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> Hi Peter.
> Just few comment.
>
> - There are more licenses in the source:
>
> $ licensecheck * | grep -v UNKNOWN
...
> srgb_profile.h: MIT/X11 (BSD like)
...
Ba
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=913289
Luya Tshimbalanga changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|l...@fedoraproject.or
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=913289
--- Comment #4 from Luya Tshimbalanga ---
Package Review
==
Key:
[x] = Pass
[!] = Fail
[-] = Not applicable
= MUST items =
C/C++:
[x]: Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[x]: Package does not c
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=913289
Luya Tshimbalanga changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=913289
Peter Hanecak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo? |
--- Comment #6 from Pet
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=913289
--- Comment #7 from Luya Tshimbalanga ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> (In reply to comment #5)
> > Any update?
>
> Ill me + ill children => delay. Sorry. :/
It's okay, hope your family will get better and fully healthy. Cheers!
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=913289
--- Comment #8 from Peter Hanecak ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> C/C++:
> Generic:
> [!]: Package contains no bundled libraries. sRGB.cc should not be bundled
> because colord already provides it. Perhaps addid colord-devel as b
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=913289
--- Comment #9 from Luya Tshimbalanga ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> I'm not able to find sRGB.cc in gimp-separate, nor in colord-devel. But,
> there is sRGB_type2.icc in gimp-separate+ and sRGB in colord, but those are
> differe
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=913289
--- Comment #10 from Luya Tshimbalanga ---
Further review:
]$ rpmlint
Projects/fedora-package-review/913289-gimp-separate+/srpm/gimp-separate+-0.5.8-3.fc18.src.rpm
gimp-separate+.src:27: W: unversioned-explicit-provides gimp-cmy
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=913289
--- Comment #11 from Luya Tshimbalanga ---
Any update?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=Ze7Ea0KqaK&a=cc_unsubscribe
__
43 matches
Mail list logo
