Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=919265
--- Comment #24 from Kalev Lember ---
No, nothing wrong with it, it's perfectly fine :) Just wanted to doublecheck
that it's not a typo, easy to accidentally use pkgdatadir instead of datadir.
--
You are receiving this mail beca
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=919265
--- Comment #23 from Mathieu Bridon ---
(In reply to comment #22)
> 5)
> /usr/share/bijiben/icons
> /usr/share/bijiben/icons/hicolor
> /usr/share/bijiben/icons/hicolor/16x16
> /usr/share/bijiben/icons/hicolor/16x16/actions
> /usr/
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=919265
--- Comment #22 from Kalev Lember ---
A few comments / questions about this package:
1) The name and summary in the spec file should match up with the name and
summary in the review ticket (and also with the name and summary in
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=919265
Kalev Lember changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) |
--- Comment #21 from Kal
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=919265
Kalev Lember changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=919265
--- Comment #19 from Pierre-Yves Luyten ---
I built 3.9.1 against rawhide.
SPEC : http://py.luyten.fr/Publique/gnome/bjb/391-1/bijiben.spec
SRPM :
http://py.luyten.fr/Publique/gnome/bjb/391-1/bijiben-3.9.1-1.fc20.src.rpm
For F19
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=919265
--- Comment #18 from Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) ---
Hi Pierre,
The package's already been reviewed and looks good. I've just built myself an
rpm and am using it on my F19 system. Works well too. Looking forward to having
it in Fedo
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=919265
--- Comment #17 from Pierre-Yves Luyten ---
The manual switched to creative-commons and received small fixes
SPEC: http://py.luyten.fr/Publique/gnome/bjb/381-1/bijiben.spec
SRPM: http://py.luyten.fr/Publique/gnome/bjb/381-1/bijib
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=919265
--- Comment #16 from Pierre-Yves Luyten ---
Not much change below, yes sponsoring would be nice now the version is stable.
SPEC: http://py.luyten.fr/Publique/gnome/bjb/380-1/bijiben.spec
SRPM: http://py.luyten.fr/Publique/gnome/b
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=919265
--- Comment #15 from Mathieu Bridon ---
(In reply to comment #14)
> License is correct. Lifting FE-Legal.
Thanks Tom!
(In reply to comment #13)
> I can sponsor you
Like I said in comment 11, the package was in a state where I'd
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=919265
Tom "spot" Callaway changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|182235 (FE-Legal) |
C
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=919265
--- Comment #13 from Matthias Clasen ---
I can sponsor you
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=KLqPi3owKO&a=cc_unsubscrib
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=919265
--- Comment #12 from Pierre-Yves Luyten ---
New minor release, mostly removing patches
SPEC: http://py.luyten.fr/Publique/gnome/bjb/3792-1/bijiben.spec
SRPM:
http://py.luyten.fr/Publique/gnome/bjb/3792-1/bijiben-3.7.92-1.fc19.src
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=919265
--- Comment #11 from Mathieu Bridon ---
Ok, the package looks very good now! :)
If I could, I would approve your package, provided that the legal team confirms
I didn't make any mistake with that License tag.
I wrote to the lega
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=919265
--- Comment #10 from Pierre-Yves Luyten ---
Hey Mathieu, yes i should really look for mock soon!
SPEC: http://py.luyten.fr/Publique/gnome/bjb/3971-3/bijiben.spec
P0:
http://py.luyten.fr/Publique/gnome/bjb/3971-3/license-use-con
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=919265
--- Comment #9 from Mathieu Bridon ---
Thanks for the quick update Pierre-Yves, this is looking much better already!
Remaining issues:
[!]: gtk-update-icon-cache is not invoked
=> See:
http://fedoraproject
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=919265
--- Comment #8 from Pierre-Yves Luyten ---
Cool, %find_lang is now a good friend! Two patch were pushed (upstream so for
3.7.92 rc).
- Patch to get rid of GPLv2+
- Patch to use static link to libgd
- Use find_lang
- Remove define
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=919265
--- Comment #7 from Matthias Clasen ---
wrt:
=> Shouldn't %{_datadir}/help/C/%{name} be marked as %doc?
%find_lang does this for you if you use --with-gnome
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list fo
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=919265
--- Comment #6 from Matthias Clasen ---
Wrt to libgd - that is not actually a separately installable library, just a
git module that is being shared by a number of new GNOME applications, while
the code is getting ready for eventu
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=919265
Matthias Clasen changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mcla...@redhat.com
---
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=919265
--- Comment #4 from Mathieu Bridon ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> Hello Matthieu,
Only one "t". ;)
> thanks much for the review (sorry there was all these little
> things..).
No worries, the purpose of the review is also to lea
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=919265
--- Comment #3 from Pierre-Yves Luyten ---
Hello Matthieu, thanks much for the review (sorry there was all these little
things..). I will submit soon new SPEC and SRPM soon for the technical parts.
Concerning the license : yes, s
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=919265
Mathieu Bridon changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||boche...@fedoraproject.o
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=919265
--- Comment #1 from Pierre-Yves Luyten ---
I just built 3.7.91 and discovered some issues on previous spec. It's built
from rawhide to have all the dependencies.
Spec: http://py.luyten.fr/Publique/gnome/bjb/3791/bijiben.spec
SRPM
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=919265
Pierre-Yves Luyten changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||177841 (FE-NEEDSPONS
25 matches
Mail list logo
