https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=953384
--- Comment #21 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
__
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=953384
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You are receiving this ma
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=953384
Christopher Meng changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #20 from Ch
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=953384
--- Comment #19 from Rahul Sundaram ---
wasn't planning on creating one. for f19, being installed by default is a
distinct advantage. for existing releases, one might as well as use unrar
--
You are receiving this mail because:
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=953384
Christopher Meng changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||cicku...@gmail.com
--
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=953384
Rahul Sundaram changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Resoluti
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=953384
--- Comment #16 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=uxbsn71Vsf&a=
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=953384
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |
Flags|
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=953384
Rahul Sundaram changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=953384
Mario Blättermann changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |
Flags|
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=953384
--- Comment #13 from Rahul Sundaram ---
Bruteforced it. Recursively remove executable bit from all files. Install the
binaries using install -m755 to set executable bit for only those files. Fixes
all the valid rpmlint errors a
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=953384
--- Comment #12 from Mario Blättermann ---
Scratch build for Rawhide:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=5277924
$ rpmlint -i -v *
unar.src: I: checking
unar.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Multi -> Mulch, M
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=953384
--- Comment #11 from Rahul Sundaram ---
That essentially means reverting most of changes. Here you go
http://sundaram.fedorapeople.org/packages/unar.spec
http://sundaram.fedorapeople.org/packages/unar-1.6-3.fc18.src.rpm
--
You
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=953384
--- Comment #10 from Ville Skyttä ---
Speaking as the Fedora bash-completion maintainer and active upstream member:
I don't think requiring bash-completion is a good idea. First, it is not
actually required. Second, although it's
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=953384
Mario Blättermann changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
A
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=953384
--- Comment #8 from Rahul Sundaram ---
first things first: sorry about the number of duplicates. bugzilla was acting
up and I didn't realize the form was getting submitted since it always threw up
a error. thanks for cleaning u
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=953384
Rahul Sundaram changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Review Request: Review |Review Request: Review
17 matches
Mail list logo
