https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=954074
Scott Talbert changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=954074
Christopher Meng changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Review Request: remotebox - |Review Request: RemoteBox -
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=954074
--- Comment #7 from Christopher Meng ---
I have concerns about using /usr/share or /usr/libexec for the location of *.pl
files.
I don't want to use /usr/lib for storing *.pl, quoted from hierarchy:
/usr/libexec includes internal binaries that
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=954074
--- Comment #8 from Scott Talbert ---
I think /usr/share should be fine for *.pl. 'fedora-review' package, for
example, uses /usr/share for all of its *.py files, which I think is similar.
So it seems fine.
--
You are receiving this mail be
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=954074
--- Comment #9 from Christopher Meng ---
(In reply to Scott Talbert from comment #8)
> I think /usr/share should be fine for *.pl. 'fedora-review' package, for
> example, uses /usr/share for all of its *.py files, which I think is
> similar.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=954074
--- Comment #10 from Scott Talbert ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
Issues:
===
[!]: License field should be GPLv2 (vs GPLv2+) - I did not see anything
indicating
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=954074
--- Comment #11 from Christopher Meng ---
I don't think we need to preserve the timestamps of sed-ed files. (Some python
programs also need to remove env lines, but we don't preserve timestamps
actually.)
Others fixed at:
NEW SPEC: http://cic
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=954074
--- Comment #12 from Christopher Meng ---
Another note is that upstream allows packagers to modify some lines(which I've
modified via sed to match the FHS or actual needs).
You can check the comments in the pl files.
--
You are receiving thi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=954074
--- Comment #13 from Michael Schwendt ---
Preserving timestamps is somewhat controversial, and it is something where a
packager ought not to exxaggerate. It is not a MUST, but a SHOULD in some cases
only. Mostly: prebuilt files that are install
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=954074
Scott Talbert changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #14 from Sc
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=954074
--- Comment #15 from Christopher Meng ---
Thanks!
New Package SCM Request
===
Package Name: RemoteBox
Short Description: Open Source VirtualBox Client with Remote Management
Owners: cicku
Branches: f19 f20 el6
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=954074
Christopher Meng changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--
You are receiving t
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=954074
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You are receiving this ma
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=954074
--- Comment #16 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lis
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=954074
--- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System ---
RemoteBox-1.6-2.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/RemoteBox-1.6-2.el6
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list fo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=954074
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=954074
--- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System ---
RemoteBox-1.6-2.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/RemoteBox-1.6-2.fc19
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=954074
--- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System ---
RemoteBox-1.6-2.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/RemoteBox-1.6-2.fc20
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=954074
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #20 from Fedo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=954074
--- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System ---
RemoteBox-1.6-3.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/RemoteBox-1.6-3.el6
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list fo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=954074
--- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System ---
RemoteBox-1.1-1.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/RemoteBox-1.1-1.el6
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list fo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=954074
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=954074
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|RemoteBox-1.6-2.fc19|RemoteBox-1.6-2.fc20
--- Commen
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=954074
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|RemoteBox-1.6-2.fc20|RemoteBox-1.1-1.el6
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=954074
Christopher Meng changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #26 from Ch
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=954074
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You are receiving this ma
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=954074
--- Comment #27 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
__
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=954074
--- Comment #3 from Christopher Meng ---
I'll wait for the author's response.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=PtHmWwLLak&a=cc_unsubsc
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=954074
--- Comment #4 from Christopher Meng ---
(In reply to Volker Fröhlich from comment #1)
> error: (will be fatal in the future): value "remotebox.png" for key "Icon"
> in group "Desktop Entry" is an icon name with an extension, but there should
> b
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=954074
Christopher Meng changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=954074
Michael Scherer changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||m...@zarb.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=954074
Volker Fröhlich changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||volke...@gmx.at
--- Comment #1 from Vo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=954074
--- Comment #2 from Volker Fröhlich ---
I noticed that the file remotebox states "Licenced under the terms of the GPL".
This statement should better include the version.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug
33 matches
Mail list logo
