https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=956127
Alec Leamas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=956127
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=956127
--- Comment #19 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=RU3QckkKk1&a=cc_unsubscribe
_
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=956127
Alec Leamas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #18 from Alec Leam
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=956127
--- Comment #17 from Alec Leamas ---
Package Change Request
==
Package Name: entypo-fonts
New Branches: f18 f19
Owners: leamas
InitialCC:
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscrib
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=956127
Orion Poplawski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |
Flags|
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=956127
--- Comment #15 from Alec Leamas ---
Yes, that's definitely wrong. Looking into [1] I understand the the fontconfig
.conf template is normally is §used for two things:
- To define a whether this font (entypo) should be replacing a
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=956127
--- Comment #14 from Orion Poplawski ---
I thought the plan was only to ship the .ttf (and perhaps the .eot if ie9
support was needed)?
Is the fontconfig file still correct, this seems wrong to me:
$ cat /usr/share/fontconfig/co
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=956127
--- Comment #13 from Alec Leamas ---
The webfont discussion seems to boil down to that there is no such thing. As a
consequence, this is packaged as a regular ttf desktop font.
Also because of this discussion, I don't package the
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=956127
Alec Leamas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||957339
--
You are receivi
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=956127
--- Comment #12 from Alec Leamas ---
Created attachment 745238
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=745238&action=edit
fontlint output entypo
Output from repo-font-audit. The upstream website does not have a bugtra
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=956127
--- Comment #11 from Alec Leamas ---
Thanks for all input so far! FPC ticket:
https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/277
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https:/
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=956127
--- Comment #10 from Orion Poplawski ---
No, I'm not going to be able to drive this process, sorry. But here are my
thoughts which perhaps you could present to the packaging committee, as well as
things that need exploring:
- In
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=956127
--- Comment #9 from Alec Leamas ---
I'm all for it, trusting you to handle the process.
(Feeling a bit ashamed, as it turns out this was not a fair deal. Seems that I
will owe you one more before this is over).
Don't forget we m
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=956127
--- Comment #8 from Orion Poplawski ---
For example - it might be worth coming up with a scheme where the @font-face
files are installed into a web-accessible location rather than
/usr/share/fonts, espcially if the *.ttf files are
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=956127
--- Comment #7 from Orion Poplawski ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> (In reply to comment #5)
> > You need to bump the release for each change (even during review).
> No :)
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:
> Guidelines#Mu
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=956127
--- Comment #6 from Alec Leamas ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> You need to bump the release for each change (even during review).
No :)
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Multiple_Changelog_Entries_per_Release
>
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=956127
--- Comment #5 from Orion Poplawski ---
You need to bump the release for each change (even during review).
I've got some questions about this:
- What is the difference between the stuff in the @font-face directory and that
in th
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=956127
Alec Leamas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Review Request: |Review Request:
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=956127
Alec Leamas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Review Request: |Review Request:
20 matches
Mail list logo
