https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=956931
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|homerun-1.0.0-5.fc19|homerun-1.0.0-5.fc18
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=956931
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=956931
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #39 from Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=956931
--- Comment #38 from Fedora Update System ---
homerun-1.0.0-5.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/homerun-1.0.0-5.fc19
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=956931
--- Comment #37 from Fedora Update System ---
homerun-1.0.0-5.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/homerun-1.0.0-5.fc18
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=956931
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=956931
--- Comment #36 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=kh1jn419ax&a=cc_unsubscribe
_
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=956931
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=956931
--- Comment #35 from Mario Blättermann ---
OK, already approved anyway.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=u7S3CBGANo&a=cc_unsubscribe
_
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=956931
--- Comment #34 from Joseph Marrero ---
http://ece.uprm.edu/jmarrero/fedora_packaging/homerun/homerun.spec
http://ece.uprm.edu/jmarrero/fedora_packaging/homerun/homerun-1.0.0-5.fc19.src.rpm
old packages:
http://ece.uprm.edu/jmarrero/fedora_pack
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=956931
--- Comment #33 from Joseph Marrero ---
Thank you both for your time and help :)
I will post here the src.rpm and spec with the %post and %postun fixed.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe fro
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=956931
Joseph Marrero changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #32 from Joseph
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=956931
--- Comment #31 from Rex Dieter ---
correct, those are largely plugins, and not in linker path, so no need for
ldconfig in the main pkg
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=956931
--- Comment #30 from Mario Blättermann ---
(In reply to Mario Blättermann from comment #29)
> Still one issue:
>
> The /sbin/ldconfig call belongs to the -libs package:
>
> %post libs
> /sbin/ldconfig
>
> %postun libs
> /sbin/ldconfig
>
> Tha
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=956931
Mario Blättermann changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review+
--- Comment #29 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=956931
--- Comment #28 from Joseph Marrero ---
Koji Scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=5569387
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redha
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=956931
--- Comment #27 from Joseph Marrero ---
http://ece.uprm.edu/jmarrero/fedora_packaging/homerun/homerun.spec
http://ece.uprm.edu/jmarrero/fedora_packaging/homerun/homerun-1.0.0-4.fc19.src.rpm
old packages:
http://ece.uprm.edu/jmarrero/fedora_pack
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=956931
--- Comment #26 from Rex Dieter ---
> OK, then leave the svgz icon as is. BTW, this senseless message from rpmlint
> is
worth to be reported as a bug.
Indeed, it's a long-standing problem that rpmlint's policies sometimes do not
match our curre
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=956931
--- Comment #25 from Mario Blättermann ---
(In reply to Rex Dieter from comment #24)
> > Not all desktop environments that support SVG icons support them gzipped
> (.svgz). Install the icon as plain uncompressed SVG.
>
> Please don't make sugge
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=956931
--- Comment #24 from Rex Dieter ---
> Not all desktop environments that support SVG icons support them gzipped
(.svgz). Install the icon as plain uncompressed SVG.
Please don't make suggestions for which there aren't packaging guidelines.
This
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=956931
--- Comment #23 from Mario Blättermann ---
Scratch build:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=5569032
$ rpmlint -i -v *
homerun.src: I: checking
homerun.src: I: checking-url http://userbase.kde.org/Homerun (timeout 10
seconds)
hom
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=956931
--- Comment #22 from Joseph Marrero ---
Having read the link, I think I fixed the licensing issue in in the last -3
version.
Let me know If I missed something.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubsc
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=956931
--- Comment #18 from Rex Dieter ---
and, please do not simply use GPLv2+ or LGPLv2+, fedora-legal has already
commented that this special KDE case with "KDE e.V. may determine that future
GPL versions are accepted" cannot use this variant, and re
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=956931
--- Comment #21 from Joseph Marrero ---
Ahh thanks for the links, reeding...
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=GTg1J2Cq4j&a=cc_unsubscr
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=956931
--- Comment #20 from Joseph Marrero ---
Thanks Rex for the correct way of doing this.
http://ece.uprm.edu/jmarrero/fedora_packaging/homerun/homerun.spec
http://ece.uprm.edu/jmarrero/fedora_packaging/homerun/homerun-1.0.0-3.fc19.src.rpm
old pack
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=956931
--- Comment #19 from Rex Dieter ---
For background, see thread that includes:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/legal/2011-February/001541.html
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=956931
--- Comment #17 from Rex Dieter ---
well, strictly, there is an option 3, simply:
# KDE e.V. may determine that future GPL versions are accepted
License: GPLv2 or GPLv3
since this does accurately reflect the combined work of everything, but th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=956931
--- Comment #16 from Mario Blättermann ---
You can define it separately for each package:
Name: homerun
Version:1.0.0
Release:2%{?dist}
Summary:KDE Application Launcher
License:GPLv2+
%package libs
Sum
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=956931
--- Comment #15 from Rex Dieter ---
2 options:
1. basically follow my suggestion in comment #12:
in main pkg near top include the snippet (with comment):
# KDE e.V. may determine that future GPL versions are accepted
License: GPLv2 or GPLv3
a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=956931
--- Comment #14 from Joseph Marrero ---
i.e. Like this:
License:GPLv2+ and LGPLv2+
#GPLv2+ for the main package and LGPLv2+ for the libs package.
??
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Un
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=956931
--- Comment #13 from Joseph Marrero ---
GPLv2+ and LGPLv2+ only then? And both go in the license tag only?
Or should I make a comment specifying that the GPLv2+ is for the main package
and the LGPLv2+ goes to the libs package?
--
You are receiv
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=956931
--- Comment #12 from Mario Blättermann ---
Please recognize the latest comment from Rex Dieter regarding the licenses:
(In reply to Rex Dieter from comment #10)
> main pkg:
> # KDE e.V. may determine that future GPL versions are accepted
> Licens
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=956931
Joseph Marrero changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(jmarr...@gmail.co |
|m)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=956931
Rex Dieter changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|nob...@fedorapr
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=956931
--- Comment #10 from Rex Dieter ---
fwiw, I disagree with the recommendation in comment #8 wrt licensing, this
should be sufficient to include in the .spec:
main pkg:
# KDE e.V. may determine that future GPL versions are accepted
License: GPLv2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=956931
Mario Blättermann changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jmarr...@gmail.com
Flag
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=956931
--- Comment #8 from Mario Blättermann ---
From the COPYING file:
Individual files should have appropriate license headers.
libhomerun is licensed under LGPL v2.1 or v3 or later versions approved by the
membership of KDE e.V.
homerunviewer and
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=956931
--- Comment #7 from Joseph Marrero ---
Here is the the latest version with the -libs sub package and updated to the
latest 1.0.0 release.
http://ece.uprm.edu/jmarrero/fedora_packaging/homerun/homerun.spec
http://ece.uprm.edu/jmarrero/fedora_pack
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=956931
--- Comment #6 from Joseph Marrero ---
I will upload my package in a week or so, I am in my finals got no time right
now.
But I am still interested in completing this. Sorry for the delay.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=956931
--- Comment #5 from Rex Dieter ---
As long as you don't mind the main pkg getting multilib'd because of a lack of
-libs subpkg, then it's ok. :)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubsc
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=956931
--- Comment #4 from Joseph Marrero ---
Spec URL: http://jmarrero.fedorapeople.org/packages/homerun/homerun.spec
SRPM URL:
http://jmarrero.fedorapeople.org/packages/homerun/homerun-0.2.2-3.fc18.src.rpm
Koji:
http://koji.fedorapro
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=956931
Mario Blättermann changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mario.blaetterm...@gm
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=956931
--- Comment #2 from Joseph Marrero ---
New files with fixes:
Spec URL: http://jmarrero.fedorapeople.org/packages/homerun/homerun.spec
SRPM URL:
http://jmarrero.fedorapeople.org/packages/homerun/homerun-0.2.2-2.fc18.src.rpm
Koji:
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=956931
--- Comment #1 from Rex Dieter ---
Initial comments:
1. add ldconfig scriptlets for shared library:
%{_kde4_libdir}/libhomerun.so.0*
2. change
%{_kde4_datadir}/icons/*
to
%{_kde4_iconsdir}/oxygen/*/*/*
3. instead of
%{_kde4_
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=956931
Rex Dieter changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rdie...@math.unl.edu
45 matches
Mail list logo
