https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=957333
Christopher Meng changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=957333
--- Comment #28 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
__
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=957333
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You are receiving this ma
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=957333
Eugene A. Pivnev changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|CLOSED |MODIFIED
Resolution|ERRATA
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=957333
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|quiterss-0.12.5-3.fc19 |quiterss-0.12.5-3.
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=957333
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=957333
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ON_QA
--- Comment
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=957333
--- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System ---
quiterss-0.12.5-3.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/quiterss-0.12.5-3.fc19
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are o
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=957333
--- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System ---
quiterss-0.12.5-3.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/quiterss-0.12.5-3.fc18
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are o
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=957333
--- Comment #21 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=yZ0ur1GTq9&a=
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=957333
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |
Flags|
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=957333
--- Comment #20 from Eugene A. Pivnev ---
(In reply to comment #18)
> (In reply to comment #17)
> > (In reply to comment #16)
> > > (In reply to comment #11)
> > > > (In reply to comment #8)
> Ok, look fine now. Finally you convin
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=957333
Eugene A. Pivnev changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comme
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=957333
Markus Mayer changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |
Flags|
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=957333
--- Comment #17 from Eugene A. Pivnev ---
(In reply to comment #16)
> (In reply to comment #11)
> > (In reply to comment #8)
> As Kevin stated, packaging it would be the best solution. But I am fine with
> bundling it
As this sni
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=957333
--- Comment #16 from Markus Mayer ---
(In reply to comment #11)
> (In reply to comment #8)
> > Clarifications:
> > ===
> > %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise:
> > I don't see how the appropr
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=957333
--- Comment #15 from Eugene A. Pivnev ---
(In reply to comment #14)
> > Fedora has no qyursqltreeview in repos:
> > https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/s/qyursqltreeview
>
> That just means that you should package it.
qyursq
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=957333
--- Comment #14 from Kevin Kofler ---
> Fedora has no qyursqltreeview in repos:
> https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/s/qyursqltreeview
That just means that you should package it.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=957333
--- Comment #13 from Eugene A. Pivnev ---
* smp_flags added
* pkgconfig ... replaced with qmake-qt4
Spec URL: http://tieugene.fedorapeople.org/rpms/quiterss/quiterss.spec
SRPM URL:
http://tieugene.fedorapeople.org/rpms/quiterss/q
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=957333
--- Comment #12 from Eugene A. Pivnev ---
(In reply to comment #11)
> (In reply to comment #8)
> > License field in the package spec file matches the actual license:
> > LGPL (v2 or later): 3rdparty/qyursqltreeview/qyursqltreeview
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=957333
--- Comment #11 from Eugene A. Pivnev ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> Clarifications:
> ===
> %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise:
> I don't see how the appropriate flags are passed to make.
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=957333
--- Comment #10 from Christopher Meng ---
(In reply to comment #6)
Don't use anything you think it's "OK".
In fact your spec is not readable for Fedora but in OBS it can works well.
So I hope you can adopt our suggestion.
--
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=957333
--- Comment #9 from Kevin Kofler ---
> The problem is that in RH-based distros (_only_ in RH-based) Qt4's qmake is
> qmake-qt4.
… as it should be. Debian had been shipping it that way too until they decided
to drop Qt 3 (at which
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=957333
--- Comment #8 from Markus Mayer ---
Package Review
==
Key:
[x] = Pass
[!] = Fail
[-] = Not applicable
[?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
C/C++:
[x]: Package does not contain ker
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=957333
Markus Mayer changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||lotharl...@gmx.de
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=957333
--- Comment #6 from Eugene A. Pivnev ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> > If I can make spec suse- or mdk-compatible - why not?
>
> Because it makes the specfile much less readable.
>
> And FWIW, /usr/bin/qmake-qt4 is where the actu
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=957333
--- Comment #5 from Kevin Kofler ---
> If I can make spec suse- or mdk-compatible - why not?
Because it makes the specfile much less readable.
And FWIW, /usr/bin/qmake-qt4 is where the actual binary sits in Fedora,
`pkg-config -
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=957333
--- Comment #4 from Eugene A. Pivnev ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> Yes, and I'd also use qmake-qt4 rather than
> `pkg-config --variable=exec_prefix QtCore`/bin/qmake
And I also prefere to use pkg-config to ask who is who (and wh
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=957333
--- Comment #3 from Eugene A. Pivnev ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> Yes, and I'd also use qmake-qt4 rather than
> `pkg-config --variable=exec_prefix QtCore`/bin/qmake
This is distro-independent solution.
If I can make spec suse-
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=957333
--- Comment #2 from Kevin Kofler ---
Yes, and I'd also use qmake-qt4 rather than
`pkg-config --variable=exec_prefix QtCore`/bin/qmake
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from t
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=957333
--- Comment #1 from Christopher Meng ---
Maybe /usr should be replaced by %{_prefix}?
But it's not a big problem.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bu
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=957333
Kevin Kofler changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ke...@tigcc.ticalc.org
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=957333
Eugene A. Pivnev changed:
What|Removed |Added
Whiteboard|Trivia |Trivial
--
You are r
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=957333
Eugene A. Pivnev changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||928937 (qt-reviews)
34 matches
Mail list logo
