[Bug 957347] Review Request: storeBackup - A very space efficient disk-to-disk backup suite

2016-09-25 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=957347 Dridi Boukelmoune changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||201449 (FE-DEADREVIEW) Referenced

[Bug 957347] Review Request: storeBackup - A very space efficient disk-to-disk backup suite

2016-09-25 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=957347 Dridi Boukelmoune changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|---

[Bug 957347] Review Request: storeBackup - A very space efficient disk-to-disk backup suite

2013-09-26 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=957347 --- Comment #4 from Christopher Meng --- Spec URL: http://cicku.me/storeBackup.spec SRPM URL: http://cicku.me/storeBackup-3.4.2-1.fc21.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this b

[Bug 957347] Review Request: storeBackup - A very space efficient disk-to-disk backup suite

2013-09-26 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=957347 --- Comment #5 from Christopher Meng --- (In reply to Till Maas from comment #2) > see comment:1 Fixed now. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/to

[Bug 957347] Review Request: storeBackup - A very space efficient disk-to-disk backup suite

2013-11-03 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=957347 Christopher Meng changed: What|Removed |Added Whiteboard||Ready -- You are receiving this ma

[Bug 957347] Review Request: storeBackup - A very space efficient disk-to-disk backup suite

2013-12-29 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=957347 Dridi Boukelmoune changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|

[Bug 957347] Review Request: storeBackup - A very space efficient disk-to-disk backup suite

2014-01-11 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=957347 --- Comment #6 from Dridi Boukelmoune --- Package Review == Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed Issues: === - Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage.

[Bug 957347] Review Request: storeBackup - A very space efficient disk-to-disk backup suite

2014-01-12 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=957347 --- Comment #7 from Christopher Meng --- This is a old version, I fixed up all errors but forgot to upload again. I will merge your reviews with local one and upload them later. Thanks! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the

[Bug 957347] Review Request: storeBackup - A very space efficient disk-to-disk backup suite

2014-01-12 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=957347 --- Comment #8 from Christopher Meng --- s@/a/@/an/@. Sorry for the brevity on phone. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___

[Bug 957347] Review Request: storeBackup - A very space efficient disk-to-disk backup suite

2014-01-13 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=957347 --- Comment #9 from Christopher Meng --- (In reply to Dridi Boukelmoune from comment #6) > - Could scripts in %{_libdir} move to %{_libdir}/%{name} ? > Also %{_libdir}/stbu*.pl can be executed (they have a #!shebang) I'm afraid I don't have

[Bug 957347] Review Request: storeBackup - A very space efficient disk-to-disk backup suite

2014-01-21 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=957347 --- Comment #10 from Dridi Boukelmoune --- (In reply to Christopher Meng from comment #9) > I'm afraid I don't have plan to move them to subdir currently. As this need > me to patch the software, I'm not sure if I'm proper to do that. Can you >

[Bug 957347] Review Request: storeBackup - A very space efficient disk-to-disk backup suite

2013-06-15 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=957347 --- Comment #1 from Michael Schwendt --- > AutoReq: no Why? That's really so unusual, you ought to give the rationale in the spec file. $ storeBackup Can't locate checkParam2.pl in @INC (@INC contains: /usr/lib /usr/local/lib64/perl

[Bug 957347] Review Request: storeBackup - A very space efficient disk-to-disk backup suite

2013-07-06 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=957347 Till Maas changed: What|Removed |Added CC||cicku...@gmail.com, |

[Bug 957347] Review Request: storeBackup - A very space efficient disk-to-disk backup suite

2013-07-06 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=957347 Christopher Meng changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|needinfo?(cicku...@gmail.co | |m)

[Bug 957347] Review Request: storeBackup - A very space efficient disk-to-disk backup suite

2013-04-27 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=957347 Christopher Meng changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR

[Bug 957347] Review Request: storeBackup - A very space efficient disk-to-disk backup suite

2013-05-05 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=957347 Michael Scherer changed: What|Removed |Added CC||m...@zarb.org