https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=960728
--- Comment #5 from Timothy St. Clair tstcl...@redhat.com ---
Looking at 2.0.5, it appears to be a testing only dependency (possibly for
compatibility). It appears we may be able to prune the dependency entirely as
we track forward progress a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=960728
Timothy St. Clair tstcl...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=960728
Timothy St. Clair tstcl...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=960728
--- Comment #4 from Pete MacKinnon pmack...@redhat.com ---
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=5388205
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=960728
--- Comment #3 from Pete MacKinnon pmack...@redhat.com ---
As a dependency for the Hadoop 2.x series, we would like to maintain KFS for a
period of time and guide Hadoop upstream adoption towards QFS. QFS can be
configured in as a
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=960728
--- Comment #2 from Robin Lee robinlee.s...@gmail.com ---
KFS upstream seems dead. Do you really want to maintain this package? Or switch
to QFS, what you have mentioned in the specfile?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=960728
Robin Lee robinlee.s...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
