https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=961419
Björn Persson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=961419
--- Comment #9 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=HNBWVzYEbB&a=cc_unsubscribe
__
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=961419
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=961419
Björn Persson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #8 from Björn Pe
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=961419
Christopher Meng changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #7 from Ch
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=961419
--- Comment #6 from Björn Persson ---
(In reply to Christopher Meng from comment #5)
> Only this:
>
> anet.i686: I: enchant-dictionary-not-found sv
So you don't have a Swedish spell checking library installed. Don't worry. I
assure you that the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=961419
--- Comment #5 from Christopher Meng ---
Only this:
anet.i686: I: enchant-dictionary-not-found sv
And, where is Ahven?
Will you package it?
If not I will package it ;)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the b
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=961419
--- Comment #4 from Björn Persson ---
Yes, now I can use %doc. (The documentation does get divided into two
directories, anet and anet-devel, which is unnecessary but not a big problem.)
https://www.rombobjörn.se/packages/anet-0.2.2-2/anet.spec
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=961419
--- Comment #3 from Christopher Meng ---
Hi,
Since versioned docdir path will be replaced by unversioned, can you revise
your spec?
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/UnversionedDocdirs
Thanks.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
Yo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=961419
Christopher Meng changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|nob...@fe
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=961419
--- Comment #2 from Björn Persson ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> IMO I think there is no need to write Summary(sv) and %description devel -l
> sv %{common_description_sv} same as well.
The packaging guidelines allow it, and the r
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=961419
Christopher Meng changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||cicku...@gmail.com
--
12 matches
Mail list logo
