[Bug 962189] Review Request: cego - A relational and transactional database

2014-01-27 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=962189 --- Comment #28 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component

[Bug 962189] Review Request: cego - A relational and transactional database

2014-01-27 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=962189 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You

[Bug 962189] Review Request: cego - A relational and transactional database

2014-01-26 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=962189 Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? ---

[Bug 962189] Review Request: cego - A relational and transactional database

2013-07-21 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=962189 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|

[Bug 962189] Review Request: cego - A relational and transactional database

2013-07-21 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=962189 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|cego-2.18.10-1.fc18

[Bug 962189] Review Request: cego - A relational and transactional database

2013-07-20 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=962189 Michael Scherer m...@zarb.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||m...@zarb.org ---

[Bug 962189] Review Request: cego - A relational and transactional database

2013-07-20 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=962189 --- Comment #24 from Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com --- Hi, A note is that this software requires a defined table to be set so it can't be started before you initialize the system, create a table. I'll look into this problem later. --

[Bug 962189] Review Request: cego - A relational and transactional database

2013-07-12 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=962189 --- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- cego-2.18.10-1.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/cego-2.18.10-1.fc18 -- You are receiving this mail because: You

[Bug 962189] Review Request: cego - A relational and transactional database

2013-07-12 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=962189 --- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- cego-2.18.10-1.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/cego-2.18.10-1.fc19 -- You are receiving this mail because: You

[Bug 962189] Review Request: cego - A relational and transactional database

2013-05-31 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=962189 Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? ---

[Bug 962189] Review Request: cego - A relational and transactional database

2013-05-31 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=962189 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? | Flags|

[Bug 962189] Review Request: cego - A relational and transactional database

2013-05-31 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=962189 --- Comment #20 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug

[Bug 962189] Review Request: cego - A relational and transactional database

2013-05-31 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=962189 Bug 962189 depends on bug 960041, which changed state. Bug 960041 Summary: Review Request: lfcxml - Lemke Foundation Classes XML extension https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=960041 What|Removed

[Bug 962189] Review Request: cego - A relational and transactional database

2013-05-30 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=962189 Björn Esser bjoern.es...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED

[Bug 962189] Review Request: cego - A relational and transactional database

2013-05-26 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=962189 --- Comment #16 from Björn Esser bjoern.es...@gmail.com --- Would you update the Spec/SRPM URL-Tags, please? Thoose tags are traced by `fedora-review`, so it will automagicly fetch the updated stuff. -- You are receiving this mail because: You

[Bug 962189] Review Request: cego - A relational and transactional database

2013-05-26 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=962189 --- Comment #17 from Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com --- Spec URL: http://cicku.me/cego.spec SRPM URL: http://cicku.me/cego-2.18.7-1.fc20.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from

[Bug 962189] Review Request: cego - A relational and transactional database

2013-05-25 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=962189 --- Comment #15 from Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com --- New version with some fixes: http://cicku.me/cego-2.18.7-1.fc20.src.rpm Please check again, maybe same problems still existed. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the

[Bug 962189] Review Request: cego - A relational and transactional database

2013-05-23 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=962189 --- Comment #14 from Björn Esser bjoern.es...@gmail.com --- * fedora-review shows: warning: bogus date in %changelog: Wed May 23 2013 Christopher Meng r...@cicku.me - 2.18.6-1 -- Thu May 23 * in spec: BuildRequires: lfcbase-devel%{?_isa}

[Bug 962189] Review Request: cego - A relational and transactional database

2013-05-22 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=962189 --- Comment #9 from Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com --- Maybe I should fix the rpath mentioned like: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Removing_Rpath ? Try this: Spec URL: http://cicku.me/cego.spec SRPM URL:

[Bug 962189] Review Request: cego - A relational and transactional database

2013-05-22 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=962189 --- Comment #10 from Björn Esser bjoern.es...@gmail.com --- rpmlint shows: * binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath * unused-direct-shlib-dependency is still there. For your sed-magic on libtool to work on this you must add: +BuildRequires:

[Bug 962189] Review Request: cego - A relational and transactional database

2013-05-22 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=962189 --- Comment #11 from Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com --- Why should I +Requires: lfcbase-devel%{?_isa} +Requires: lfcxml-devel%{?_isa} Any reason? Thanks. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for

[Bug 962189] Review Request: cego - A relational and transactional database

2013-05-22 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=962189 --- Comment #12 from Björn Esser bjoern.es...@gmail.com --- `grep -R -elfc*/` on devel-pkg reveals: usr/include/cego/CegoFieldValue.h:#include lfcbase/Chain.h usr/include/cego/CegoField.h:#include lfcbase/Chain.h

[Bug 962189] Review Request: cego - A relational and transactional database

2013-05-22 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=962189 --- Comment #13 from Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com --- Spec URL: http://cicku.me/cego.spec SRPM URL: http://cicku.me/cego-2.18.6-1.fc20.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from

[Bug 962189] Review Request: cego - A relational and transactional database

2013-05-21 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=962189 --- Comment #3 from Björn Esser bjoern.es...@gmail.com --- FTBFS on rawhide! BuildRequires are insane?!? no package found for: * liblfc-devel * liblfc-xml-devel Please fix! I'll review again, then. -- You are receiving this mail because:

[Bug 962189] Review Request: cego - A relational and transactional database

2013-05-21 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=962189 Björn Esser bjoern.es...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- You

[Bug 962189] Review Request: cego - A relational and transactional database

2013-05-21 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=962189 --- Comment #4 from Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com --- (In reply to Björn Esser from comment #3) FTBFS on rawhide! BuildRequires are insane?!? no package found for: * liblfc-devel * liblfc-xml-devel Please fix! I'll review

[Bug 962189] Review Request: cego - A relational and transactional database

2013-05-21 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=962189 --- Comment #5 from Björn Esser bjoern.es...@gmail.com --- Allright! Since `fedora-review -L $PATH_ADDITIONAL_DEPS` can be used to review pkgs with blocking, unreleased deps, I thought you'd be happy with quick progress on reviewing... ;) --

[Bug 962189] Review Request: cego - A relational and transactional database

2013-05-21 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=962189 --- Comment #6 from Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com --- Spec URL: http://cicku.me/cego.spec SRPM URL: http://cicku.me/cego-2.18.4-1.fc20.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from

[Bug 962189] Review Request: cego - A relational and transactional database

2013-05-21 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=962189 --- Comment #7 from Björn Esser bjoern.es...@gmail.com --- So first review-build revealed serveral rpmlint issues: * binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath -- upstream should fix this As a temporary solution on of these should fix:

[Bug 962189] Review Request: cego - A relational and transactional database

2013-05-21 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=962189 Bug 962189 depends on bug 959974, which changed state. Bug 959974 Summary: Review Request: lfcbase - Lemke Foundation Classes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=959974 What|Removed |Added

[Bug 962189] Review Request: cego - A relational and transactional database

2013-05-21 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=962189 --- Comment #8 from Björn Esser bjoern.es...@gmail.com --- I forgot to mention: %check -make check -- nothing to do here... +./checkDB base +./checkDB gate -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 962189] Review Request: cego - A relational and transactional database

2013-05-21 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=962189 Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On|959974 | -- You are

[Bug 962189] Review Request: cego - A relational and transactional database

2013-05-21 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=962189 Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||959974 -- You are

[Bug 962189] Review Request: cego - A relational and transactional database

2013-05-20 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=962189 Björn Esser bjoern.es...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug 962189] Review Request: cego - A relational and transactional database

2013-05-18 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=962189 --- Comment #2 from Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com --- New upstream release with several huge rewrite: Spec URL: http://cicku.me/cego.spec SRPM URL: http://cicku.me/cego-2.18.3-1.fc20.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail

[Bug 962189] Review Request: cego - A relational and transactional database

2013-05-15 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=962189 --- Comment #1 from Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com --- New upstream release with several large fixes: Spec URL: http://cicku.me/cego.spec SRPM URL: http://cicku.me/cego-2.18.1-1.fc20.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail

[Bug 962189] Review Request: cego - A relational and transactional database

2013-05-15 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=962189 Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|960041 |

[Bug 962189] Review Request: cego - A relational and transactional database

2013-05-15 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=962189 Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|959974 |

[Bug 962189] Review Request: cego - A relational and transactional database

2013-05-12 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=962189 Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|