[Bug 962651] Re-Review Request: bamf - Application matching framework

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=962651 Praveen Kumar changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||needinfo?(michel+fdr@sylves

[Bug 962651] Re-Review Request: bamf - Application matching framework

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=962651 --- Comment #13 from Praveen Kumar --- Hi Salim, This package is really becoming a blocker for other gnome-pie bugs, can you please provide your input? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are alway

[Bug 962651] Re-Review Request: bamf - Application matching framework

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=962651 Christopher Meng changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|---

[Bug 962651] Re-Review Request: bamf - Application matching framework

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=962651 Michel Alexandre Salim changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #7 from Mi

[Bug 962651] Re-Review Request: bamf - Application matching framework

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=962651 --- Comment #8 from Praveen Kumar --- Hi Salim, Yes a updated SPEC and SRPM will be enough for this review, what is the progress on License issue? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from thi

[Bug 962651] Re-Review Request: bamf - Application matching framework

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=962651 --- Comment #9 from Michel Alexandre Salim --- Hi Praveen, Sorry for the delay, been busy with work. http://salimma.fedorapeople.org/specs/gnome/bamf.spec http://salimma.fedorapeople.org/specs/gnome/bamf-0.3.6-3.fc19.src.rpm As for the license

[Bug 962651] Re-Review Request: bamf - Application matching framework

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=962651 Praveen Kumar changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? | Flags|

[Bug 962651] Re-Review Request: bamf - Application matching framework

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=962651 --- Comment #11 from Michel Alexandre Salim --- Thanks, requesting unblocking in the rel-eng trac https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/5589 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bu

[Bug 962651] Re-Review Request: bamf - Application matching framework

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=962651 Christopher Meng changed: What|Removed |Added CC||cicku...@gmail.com,

[Bug 962651] Re-Review Request: bamf - Application matching framework

Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=962651 Michel Alexandre Salim changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kumarpraveen.nit

[Bug 962651] Re-Review Request: bamf - Application matching framework

Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=962651 --- Comment #2 from Praveen Kumar --- Hi Michel, Thanks for taking this package, I will do a formal review today. I am not changing "Assigned Flag" right now, will do it later. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on

[Bug 962651] Re-Review Request: bamf - Application matching framework

Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=962651 --- Comment #3 from Praveen Kumar --- Package Review == Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed = MUST items = C/C++: [-]: Package does not conta

[Bug 962651] Re-Review Request: bamf - Application matching framework

Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=962651 MartinKG changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mgans...@alice.de --- Comment

[Bug 962651] Re-Review Request: bamf - Application matching framework

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=962651 Michel Alexandre Salim changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||needinfo? --- Comment #5 from M

[Bug 962651] Re-Review Request: bamf - Application matching framework

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=962651 Praveen Kumar changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|kumarpraveen.nitdgp@gmail.c