[Bug 967620] Review Request: edelib - Small and portable C++ library for EDE

2016-08-29 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=967620 Douglas Schilling Landgraf changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA

[Bug 967620] Review Request: edelib - Small and portable C++ library for EDE

2014-06-25 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=967620 Christopher Meng i...@cicku.me changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug 967620] Review Request: edelib - Small and portable C++ library for EDE

2014-06-25 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=967620 --- Comment #25 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- edelib-2.1-2.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/edelib-2.1-2.fc20 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are

[Bug 967620] Review Request: edelib - Small and portable C++ library for EDE

2014-06-25 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=967620 --- Comment #26 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- edelib-2.1-2.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/edelib-2.1-2.fc19 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are

[Bug 967620] Review Request: edelib - Small and portable C++ library for EDE

2014-06-25 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=967620 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|ON_QA

[Bug 967620] Review Request: edelib - Small and portable C++ library for EDE

2014-06-24 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=967620 Douglas Schilling Landgraf dougsl...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|

[Bug 967620] Review Request: edelib - Small and portable C++ library for EDE

2013-06-14 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=967620 --- Comment #23 from Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com --- Hi all, Things should get better now. I've fixed the shared library problem. NEW SPEC URL: http://cicku.me/edelib.spec NEW SRPM URL: http://cicku.me/edelib-2.0-3.fc20.src.rpm Can

[Bug 967620] Review Request: edelib - Small and portable C++ library for EDE

2013-06-14 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=967620 --- Comment #24 from Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.com --- Some questions based on another brief look at the new spec file: BuildRequires: libX11 Not libX11-devel? %build CFLAGS=%{optflags} CXXFLAGS=%{optflags} \ ./configure

[Bug 967620] Review Request: edelib - Small and portable C++ library for EDE

2013-06-13 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=967620 --- Comment #14 from Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com --- (In reply to Ville Skyttä from comment #13) Created attachment 758720 [details] Build with $RPM_OPT_FLAGS, BR libXpm-devel Can I build without optflags? -- You are receiving this

[Bug 967620] Review Request: edelib - Small and portable C++ library for EDE

2013-06-13 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=967620 --- Comment #15 from Ville Skyttä ville.sky...@iki.fi --- (In reply to Christopher Meng from comment #14) Can I build without optflags? Only if there is a good reason to do so, and that reason must be documented in the specfile. Why wouldn't

[Bug 967620] Review Request: edelib - Small and portable C++ library for EDE

2013-06-13 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=967620 Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug 967620] Review Request: edelib - Small and portable C++ library for EDE

2013-06-13 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=967620 --- Comment #18 from Douglas Schilling Landgraf dougsl...@redhat.com --- (In reply to Björn Esser from comment #17) More to come: * There are headers in -devel-pkg with no lib to link against, as well. * The binaries are linked against

[Bug 967620] Review Request: edelib - Small and portable C++ library for EDE

2013-06-13 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=967620 Björn Esser bjoern.es...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug 967620] Review Request: edelib - Small and portable C++ library for EDE

2013-06-13 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=967620 --- Comment #19 from Björn Esser bjoern.es...@gmail.com --- Just have a look at the build.log on koji: http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//packages/edelib/2.0/3.fc20/data/logs/x86_64/build.log MkDir1

[Bug 967620] Review Request: edelib - Small and portable C++ library for EDE

2013-06-13 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=967620 Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW --- Comment

[Bug 967620] Review Request: edelib - Small and portable C++ library for EDE

2013-06-13 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=967620 --- Comment #21 from Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.com --- I don't know what's wrong with the pkgconfig files? Well, they refer to libraries you have deleted. ;-) Examples: $ pkg-config --libs edelib -ledelib $ pkg-config --libs

[Bug 967620] Review Request: edelib - Small and portable C++ library for EDE

2013-06-13 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=967620 --- Comment #22 from Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com --- (In reply to Michael Schwendt from comment #21) Ok I know...I built them and deleted them... The main problem is that I forgot to pass --enable-shared option to the jam. I will

[Bug 967620] Review Request: edelib - Small and portable C++ library for EDE

2013-06-10 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=967620 Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |ASSIGNED -- You

[Bug 967620] Review Request: edelib - Small and portable C++ library for EDE

2013-06-09 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=967620 Ville Skyttä ville.sky...@iki.fi changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ville.sky...@iki.fi

[Bug 967620] Review Request: edelib - Small and portable C++ library for EDE

2013-06-09 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=967620 Ville Skyttä ville.sky...@iki.fi changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||496968 (DebugInfo) --

[Bug 967620] Review Request: edelib - Small and portable C++ library for EDE

2013-06-04 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=967620 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? | Flags|

[Bug 967620] Review Request: edelib - Small and portable C++ library for EDE

2013-06-04 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=967620 --- Comment #9 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug

[Bug 967620] Review Request: edelib - Small and portable C++ library for EDE

2013-06-04 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=967620 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |MODIFIED

[Bug 967620] Review Request: edelib - Small and portable C++ library for EDE

2013-06-04 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=967620 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- edelib-2.0-2.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/edelib-2.0-2.fc19 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are

[Bug 967620] Review Request: edelib - Small and portable C++ library for EDE

2013-06-04 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=967620 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- edelib-2.0-2.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/edelib-2.0-2.fc18 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are

[Bug 967620] Review Request: edelib - Small and portable C++ library for EDE

2013-06-04 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=967620 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA

[Bug 967620] Review Request: edelib - Small and portable C++ library for EDE

2013-06-03 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=967620 Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|needinfo?(cicku...@gmail.co |

[Bug 967620] Review Request: edelib - Small and portable C++ library for EDE

2013-06-03 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=967620 Douglas Schilling Landgraf dougsl...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW

[Bug 967620] Review Request: edelib - Small and portable C++ library for EDE

2013-06-03 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=967620 Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? ---

[Bug 967620] Review Request: edelib - Small and portable C++ library for EDE

2013-06-01 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=967620 Douglas Schilling Landgraf dougsl...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug 967620] Review Request: edelib - Small and portable C++ library for EDE

2013-05-31 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=967620 --- Comment #4 from Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com --- NEW Spec URL: http://cicku.me/edelib.spec NEW SRPM URL: http://cicku.me/edelib-2.0-2.fc20.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 967620] Review Request: edelib - Small and portable C++ library for EDE

2013-05-30 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=967620 Douglas Schilling Landgraf dougsl...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW

[Bug 967620] Review Request: edelib - Small and portable C++ library for EDE

2013-05-28 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=967620 Douglas Schilling Landgraf dougsl...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug 967620] Review Request: edelib - Small and portable C++ library for EDE

2013-05-28 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=967620 --- Comment #2 from Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com --- I forgot to upload the correct version. Please check again at the same url before, thanks. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from