https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=967620
Douglas Schilling Landgraf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=967620
Christopher Meng i...@cicku.me changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=967620
--- Comment #25 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
edelib-2.1-2.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/edelib-2.1-2.fc20
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=967620
--- Comment #26 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
edelib-2.1-2.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/edelib-2.1-2.fc19
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=967620
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=967620
Douglas Schilling Landgraf dougsl...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=967620
--- Comment #23 from Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com ---
Hi all,
Things should get better now. I've fixed the shared library problem.
NEW SPEC URL: http://cicku.me/edelib.spec
NEW SRPM URL: http://cicku.me/edelib-2.0-3.fc20.src.rpm
Can
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=967620
--- Comment #24 from Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.com ---
Some questions based on another brief look at the new spec file:
BuildRequires: libX11
Not libX11-devel?
%build
CFLAGS=%{optflags} CXXFLAGS=%{optflags} \
./configure
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=967620
--- Comment #14 from Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to Ville Skyttä from comment #13)
Created attachment 758720 [details]
Build with $RPM_OPT_FLAGS, BR libXpm-devel
Can I build without optflags?
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=967620
--- Comment #15 from Ville Skyttä ville.sky...@iki.fi ---
(In reply to Christopher Meng from comment #14)
Can I build without optflags?
Only if there is a good reason to do so, and that reason must be documented in
the specfile. Why wouldn't
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=967620
Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=967620
--- Comment #18 from Douglas Schilling Landgraf dougsl...@redhat.com ---
(In reply to Björn Esser from comment #17)
More to come:
* There are headers in -devel-pkg with no lib to link against, as well.
* The binaries are linked against
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=967620
Björn Esser bjoern.es...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=967620
--- Comment #19 from Björn Esser bjoern.es...@gmail.com ---
Just have a look at the build.log on koji:
http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//packages/edelib/2.0/3.fc20/data/logs/x86_64/build.log
MkDir1
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=967620
Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=967620
--- Comment #21 from Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.com ---
I don't know what's wrong with the pkgconfig files?
Well, they refer to libraries you have deleted. ;-)
Examples:
$ pkg-config --libs edelib
-ledelib
$ pkg-config --libs
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=967620
--- Comment #22 from Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to Michael Schwendt from comment #21)
Ok I know...I built them and deleted them...
The main problem is that I forgot to pass --enable-shared option to the jam.
I will
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=967620
Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |ASSIGNED
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=967620
Ville Skyttä ville.sky...@iki.fi changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ville.sky...@iki.fi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=967620
Ville Skyttä ville.sky...@iki.fi changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||496968 (DebugInfo)
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=967620
Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=967620
--- Comment #9 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=967620
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |MODIFIED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=967620
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
edelib-2.0-2.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/edelib-2.0-2.fc19
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=967620
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
edelib-2.0-2.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/edelib-2.0-2.fc18
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=967620
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=967620
Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(cicku...@gmail.co |
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=967620
Douglas Schilling Landgraf dougsl...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=967620
Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=967620
Douglas Schilling Landgraf dougsl...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=967620
--- Comment #4 from Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com ---
NEW Spec URL: http://cicku.me/edelib.spec
NEW SRPM URL: http://cicku.me/edelib-2.0-2.fc20.src.rpm
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=967620
Douglas Schilling Landgraf dougsl...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=967620
Douglas Schilling Landgraf dougsl...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=967620
--- Comment #2 from Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com ---
I forgot to upload the correct version.
Please check again at the same url before, thanks.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from
34 matches
Mail list logo