https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=969718
Bug 969718 depends on bug 101, which changed state.
Bug 101 Summary: Review Request: devscripts - Scripts for Debian Package
maintainers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=101
What|Removed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=969718
Sandro Mani changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=969718
--- Comment #28 from Sergio Monteiro Basto ---
(In reply to Sandro Mani from comment #27)
> uml: Since user-mode-linux is unavailable for Fedora, the uml subpackage
> would be broken anyway, so it cannot be provided.
I think we should pack it
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=969718
--- Comment #27 from Sandro Mani ---
uml: Since user-mode-linux is unavailable for Fedora, the uml subpackage would
be broken anyway, so it cannot be provided.
rpmlint:
- I think the non-conffile-in-etc warning can be ignored, all packages I l
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=969718
--- Comment #26 from Sergio Monteiro Basto ---
(In reply to Sandro Mani from comment #21)
> SPEC: http://smani.fedorapeople.org/review/pbuilder.spec
> SRPM: http://smani.fedorapeople.org/review/pbuilder-0.215-4.fc21.src.rpm
>
> * Thu Oct 10 20
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=969718
--- Comment #25 from Sergio Monteiro Basto ---
Created attachment 811836
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=811836&action=edit
pbuilder.spec.patch
(In reply to Sandro Mani from comment #23)
> Please build for f20+, pbuilder wo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=969718
--- Comment #24 from Sandro Mani ---
Rawhide scratch build:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6056732
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=969718
--- Comment #23 from Sandro Mani ---
Please build for f20+, pbuilder won't be packaged for any older Fedora since
devscripts is f20+.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=969718
--- Comment #22 from Sergio Monteiro Basto ---
(In reply to Sandro Mani from comment #21)
> SPEC: http://smani.fedorapeople.org/review/pbuilder.spec
> SRPM: http://smani.fedorapeople.org/review/pbuilder-0.215-4.fc21.src.rpm
>
> * Thu Oct 10 20
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=969718
--- Comment #21 from Sandro Mani ---
SPEC: http://smani.fedorapeople.org/review/pbuilder.spec
SRPM: http://smani.fedorapeople.org/review/pbuilder-0.215-4.fc21.src.rpm
* Thu Oct 10 2013 Sandro Mani - 0.215-4
- Improve README.fedora
- Add some
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=969718
--- Comment #20 from Sergio Monteiro Basto ---
Sandro thanks for your effort , I have to have time , so just in next weekend I
will look into it , meanwhile we see if Oron reply to us .
Thanks.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=969718
--- Comment #19 from Sandro Mani ---
I don't know whether oron is still pursuing this, but I'd be happy to maintain
pbuilder.
One more update:
SPEC: http://smani.fedorapeople.org/review/pbuilder.spec
SRPM: http://smani.fedorapeople.org/revie
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=969718
--- Comment #18 from Sergio Monteiro Basto ---
ok devscripts is in F20 testing, all dependencies are solved , what review
should I follow ?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
__
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=969718
--- Comment #17 from Sandro Mani ---
Some updates:
SPEC: http://smani.fedorapeople.org/review/pbuilder.spec
SRPM: http://smani.fedorapeople.org/review/pbuilder-0.215-2.fc21.src.rpm
* Fri Sep 19 2013 Sandro Mani - 0.215-2
- Create build and c
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=969718
Sandro Mani changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||101
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=969718
--- Comment #16 from Sandro Mani ---
Depends on 101000 added. 1009997 and 1009998 are a plus, but not a strict
dependency for this package.
TBH I wrote my spec before noticing that there was already one up for review,
so the diff is rather lar
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=969718
--- Comment #15 from Sergio Monteiro Basto ---
hi ,
I try look at this on weekend ,
could you post the diff of last spec and your spec ?
should we add to this bug report Depends On 101, 1009997 and 1009998 ?
I see that packages depends
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=969718
--- Comment #14 from Sandro Mani ---
By the way, I'm (successfully) using this pbuilder package currently:
SPEC: http://smani.fedorapeople.org/review/pbuilder.spec
SRPM: http://smani.fedorapeople.org/review/pbuilder-0.215-1.fc21.src.rpm
--
Y
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=969718
Sandro Mani changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||manisan...@gmail.com
--- Comment #13 fro
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=969718
Sergio Monteiro Basto changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo? |
|needinfo?(se
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=969718
Christopher Meng changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||needinfo?(ser...@serjux.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=969718
Christopher Meng changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||cicku...@gmail.com
Flags
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=969718
--- Comment #10 from Sergio Monteiro Basto ---
(In reply to Oron Peled from comment #8)
Generally approved , I have to see better point 2 ...
(In reply to Oron Peled from comment #9)
> (in reply to comment #5)
>
> * Yes, devscripts is also valu
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=969718
--- Comment #9 from Oron Peled ---
(in reply to comment #5)
* Yes, devscripts is also valuable in its own right.
* I'm willing to work on it and maintain it.
Would you have time to review it?
* In light of Bug #920163, I was thinking to have
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=969718
--- Comment #8 from Oron Peled ---
(in reply to comment #4)
1. The lower-case "linux" in the %description is part of
the package name "user-mode-linux".
It's probably better to leave as is instead of "user-mode-Linux"
2. The "/usr/lib/pbui
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=969718
--- Comment #7 from Sergio Monteiro Basto ---
Mario, do you want help on review ?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=DXP2KTrBV1&a=cc_uns
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=969718
Mario Blättermann changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=969718
--- Comment #6 from Sergio Monteiro Basto ---
https://build.opensuse.org/package/show?package=deb&project=home%3Aheliochissini
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzil
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=969718
--- Comment #5 from Sergio Monteiro Basto ---
5 - usr/bin/debuild-pbuilder requires usr/bin/debuild from Debian's devscripts
package.
I don't find any /usr/bin/debuild
seems is part of Debian devscripts
Bug #920163 could have some interest, seems
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=969718
Sergio Monteiro Basto changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|ser...@serjux.com
F
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=969718
Sergio Monteiro Basto changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||591192
--
You are receiving thi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=969718
Sergio Monteiro Basto changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||591389
--
You are receiving thi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=969718
Sergio Monteiro Basto changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||961141
--
You are receiving thi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=969718
Sergio Monteiro Basto changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ser...@serjux.com
F
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=969718
Oron Peled changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review?
--
You are receiving this m
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=969718
Oron Peled changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kana...@kanarip.com
--- Comment #3 from Oro
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=969718
--- Comment #2 from Oron Peled ---
Forgot to mention: all previous dependencies are in rawhide+f19:
- dh-make
- po-debconf
- debhelper (which depends on dpkg)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubs
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=969718
--- Comment #1 from Oron Peled ---
This replace the old bug #591388 since the reporter has no time to finish it.
What has been done:
* All issues in the original BR were fixed
* Added 'make check'
* Added man pages
* The source package now c
38 matches
Mail list logo
