https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=972860
Mario Blättermann changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|package-review@lists.fedora |
|project.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=972860
Mario Blättermann changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||656997 (kde-reviews)
--
You are rec
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=972860
Kevin Kofler changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ke...@tigcc.ticalc.org
Alias
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=972860
--- Comment #1 from Dridi Boukelmoune ---
Hi,
During my review I've found issues that look like blockers.
> MUST: rpmlint must be run on the source rpm and all binary rpms the build
> produces. The output should be posted in the review.[1]
$
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=972860
--- Comment #2 from Dridi Boukelmoune ---
To build successfully with mock:
BuildRequires: jpackage-utils
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cg
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=972860
--- Comment #3 from Christopher Meng ---
1. Well, not all times I can replace the COPYING, especially I cannot get
permission of upstream.
But such error is not blocker.
Changed to GPLv2+.
2. I will suggest RPM adding iconsdir macro into mai
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=972860
--- Comment #4 from Dridi Boukelmoune ---
(In reply to Christopher Meng from comment #3)
> 1. Well, not all times I can replace the COPYING, especially I cannot get
> permission of upstream.
>
> But such error is not blocker.
>
> Changed to G
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=972860
--- Comment #5 from Christopher Meng ---
If you are a packager, just approve it.
From your fasname dridi and varnish mod review, I think that you are not
sponsored yet.
I think you need to find a sponsor for your packages, and then let the s
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=972860
--- Comment #6 from Kevin Kofler ---
Replacing COPYING is usually a bad idea, we're not supposed to mess with
upstream COPYING files in any way. (In fact, we aren't even supposed to add
them if upstream forgot them entirely.)
--
You are recei
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=972860
--- Comment #7 from Kevin Kofler ---
Oh, and for desktop-file-install, the rule is that you must run EITHER
desktop-file-install OR desktop-file-validate on each *.desktop file, both do
the same validations (and there's an unwritten rule that f
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=972860
Dridi Boukelmoune changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review+
--
You are receivi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=972860
--- Comment #8 from Dridi Boukelmoune ---
@Kevin, thanks for the explanations. As I said to Christopher, maybe this
should be clarified in the wiki for desktop noobs like me.
@Christopher, looks like I'm allowed to change the flag since kevin'
12 matches
Mail list logo
