https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=975314
Bug 975314 depends on bug 975312, which changed state.
Bug 975312 Summary: Review Request: libodb - Common ODB runtime library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=975312
What|Removed |Added
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=975314
--- Comment #5 from Dave Johansen ---
Sorry I didn't notice the different license and didn't even check the LICENSE
file to be honest. I just assumed that since it would build against unixODBC
that it was GPLv2 like the others. I'm fine with clos
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=975314
Peter Lemenkov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||lemen...@gmail.com
Blocks|1
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=975314
Tom "spot" Callaway changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=975314
--- Comment #3 from Tom "spot" Callaway ---
Yeah, I agree. The NCUEL is non-free, and this code is under NCUEL, not GPL,
because of the target DB. Sorry. :/
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=975314
--- Comment #2 from Boris Kolpackov ---
Yes, libodb-mssql is not free software and therefore probably shouldn't be
included in Fedore. Plus the Microsoft Native Client, which is what
libodb-mssql is based on, is not free software either.
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=975314
Björn Esser changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||182235 (FE-Legal)
--- Comment #1 from Björ
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=975314
Björn Esser changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bjoern.es...@gmail.com
Blocks|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=975314
Björn Esser changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||975312
--
You are receiving this mail bec
