https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=975316
--- Comment #3 from Dave Johansen ---
This package is ready for review and a scratch build on rawhide is available
at: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6028297
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list f
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=975316
--- Comment #4 from Dave Johansen ---
Sorry, I forgot to include the link to the current source RPM in the last
comment. It can be found at:
http://daveisfera.fedorapeople.org/odb_2.2/SRPMS/libodb-qt-2.2.1-1.el6.src.rpm
--
You are receiving t
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=975316
Rex Dieter changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rdie...@math.unl.edu
--- Comment #5 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=975316
--- Comment #6 from Dave Johansen ---
Ok, thanks for the advice on that. I made the change an uploaded the simplified
spec file and the corresponding source RPM.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=975316
--- Comment #7 from Boris Kolpackov ---
Wouldn't changing qt-devel to qt4-devel mean that we will always depend on Qt4
even though the default (qt-devel) might actually be Qt5? ODB supports both and
I think if the default is/becomes Qt5 in some
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=975316
Christopher Meng changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||cicku...@gmail.com
--- Comment #8 f
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=975316
--- Comment #9 from Rex Dieter ---
re: comment #7
There will (likely) never be a Qt5-based qt-devel pkg. IMO, better to specify
exactly what you want, so you know what you're getting and there are no
surprises.
To depend on Qt5, you can use
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=975316
Peter Lemenkov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #10 from P
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=975316
Dave Johansen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #11 from Dave
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=975316
--- Comment #12 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lis
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=975316
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You are receiving this ma
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=975316
Bug 975316 depends on bug 975312, which changed state.
Bug 975312 Summary: Review Request: libodb - Common ODB runtime library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=975312
What|Removed |Added
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=975316
--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System ---
libodb-qt-2.2.1-1.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libodb-qt-2.2.1-1.fc18
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=975316
--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System ---
libodb-qt-2.2.1-1.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libodb-qt-2.2.1-1.fc19
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=975316
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=975316
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #15 from Fedo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=975316
--- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System ---
libodb-qt-2.2.1-1.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libodb-qt-2.2.1-1.el5
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC lis
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=975316
--- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System ---
libodb-qt-2.2.1-1.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libodb-qt-2.2.1-1.el6
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC lis
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=975316
--- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System ---
libodb-pgsql-2.2.0-1.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libodb-pgsql-2.2.0-1.fc20
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=975316
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=975316
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|libodb-qt-2.2.1-1.fc18 |libodb-qt-2.2.1-1.fc19
--- Comm
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=975316
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|libodb-qt-2.2.1-1.fc19 |libodb-pgsql-2.2.0-1.fc20
--- C
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=975316
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|libodb-pgsql-2.2.0-1.fc20 |libodb-qt-2.2.1-1.el6
--- Comme
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=975316
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|libodb-qt-2.2.1-1.el6 |libodb-qt-2.2.1-1.el5
--- Comme
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=975316
Björn Esser changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||975312
--
You are receiving this mail bec
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=975316
Björn Esser changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bjoern.es...@gmail.com
Blocks|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=975316
Peter Lemenkov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=975316
--- Comment #2 from Dave Johansen ---
The updated files can be found at:
Spec URL: http://daveisfera.fedorapeople.org/odb_2.2/specs/libodb-qt.spec
SRPM URL:
http://daveisfera.fedorapeople.org/odb_2.2/SRPMS/libodb-qt-2.2.1-1.fc19.src.rpm
--
You
28 matches
Mail list logo
