https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=982077
Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||or...@cora.nwra.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=982077
Eduardo Echeverria echevemas...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|package-review@lists.fedora |
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=982077
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=982077
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|python-django-ckeditor-4.0.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=982077
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=982077
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=982077
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
python-django-ckeditor-4.0.2-3.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora
19.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-django-ckeditor-4.0.2-3.fc19
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=982077
--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
python-django-ckeditor-4.0.2-3.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora
18.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-django-ckeditor-4.0.2-3.fc18
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=982077
--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
python-django-ckeditor-4.0.2-3.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora
EPEL 6.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-django-ckeditor-4.0.2-3.el6
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=982077
Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=982077
--- Comment #11 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=982077
Eduardo Echeverria echevemas...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=982077
--- Comment #9 from Marcelo Barbosa mr.marcelo.barb...@gmail.com ---
@Mathias,
Thank you for your tips and reports.
@Eduardo,
Good work, always good reviewing your packages i learn much better.
Package Review
==
Legend:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=982077
Marcelo Barbosa mr.marcelo.barb...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=982077
Matthias Runge mru...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mru...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=982077
--- Comment #4 from Matthias Runge mru...@redhat.com ---
So license must read: MPLv1.1 and ASL 2.0 and BSD and the spec file must
contain a breakdown of licenses.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=982077
--- Comment #5 from Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.com ---
I don't see a BSD license at all.
Strangely, it's in file LICENSE and PKG-INFO.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:BSD?rd=Licensing/BSD#3ClauseBSD
So license must read:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=982077
--- Comment #6 from Eduardo Echeverria echevemas...@gmail.com ---
Hi Matthias, with respect to the licenses, you're right.(I'm sorry I didn't
checked thoroughly) there are a mix of those. althought the file LICENSE
contains the boilerplate of the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=982077
--- Comment #7 from Matthias Runge mru...@redhat.com ---
Eduardo,
I'd strongly suggest to remove all those .ds_store files during prep step.
In general it's a good practice to remove unwanted files as early as possible,
to make really sure,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=982077
--- Comment #8 from Eduardo Echeverria echevemas...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to Matthias Runge from comment #7)
Eduardo,
I'd strongly suggest to remove all those .ds_store files during prep step.
In general it's a good practice to remove
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=982077
Marcelo Barbosa mr.marcelo.barb...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=982077
--- Comment #1 from Marcelo Barbosa mr.marcelo.barb...@gmail.com ---
Hi Eduardo,
I'm working in this review about your package, please one suggestion in my
review. Adjust your spec file and submit again please.
- Issue about license is false
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=982077
Marcelo Barbosa mr.marcelo.barb...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=982077
Marcelo Barbosa mr.marcelo.barb...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review?
24 matches
Mail list logo
