https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=995974
Christopher Meng changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|NOTABUG |DUPLICATE
--- Comment #34 from Chri
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=995974
Miroslav Suchý changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) |
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=995974
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugzilla.redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=995974
Christopher Meng changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=995974
--- Comment #33 from Robin Lee ---
Version 0.2.4 is available:
https://github.com/mongodb/libbson/releases
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=995974
Robin Lee changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|package-review@lists.fedora |
|project.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=995974
--- Comment #30 from Ralf Corsepius ---
MUSTFIX: Package fails to build on rawhide:
RPM build errors:
Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found:
/usr/share/doc/libbson-0.2.0/COPYING
/usr/share/doc/libbson-0.2.0/NEWS
/usr/share/doc/
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=995974
Mike Manilone changed:
What|Removed |Added
Whiteboard|NotReady|
--- Comment #29 from Mike Manilone -
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=995974
--- Comment #28 from Michael Schwendt ---
See comment 16 and comment 17 and the bottom of file
"./tests/Makefile.include". The Python related tests are conditional and are
only executed when HAVE_PYTHON is defined. In the clean koji buildroot,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=995974
--- Comment #27 from Mike Manilone ---
Sorry, I gave the wrong result (or excuse). It did work but didn't succeed. It
stopped at "make test" and complained about "no package named bson", but this
is not expected - I don't have python-bson insta
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=995974
--- Comment #26 from Michael Schwendt ---
> fedora-review worked here
What did it tell about the package?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/toke
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=995974
--- Comment #25 from Mike Manilone ---
Oops! I forgot to regenerate a src.rpm. (fedora-review worked here, I don't
know why.)
Now they are really the same.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscri
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=995974
--- Comment #24 from Michael Schwendt ---
> Both work great! =-)
Not yet. Could you verify that the spec file at "Spec URL" is exactly the same
as in the src.rpm at "SRPM URL"? Currently, the differ, and the fedora-review
tool fails because of
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=995974
--- Comment #23 from Mike Manilone ---
(In reply to Michael Schwendt from comment #22)
> Have you tried a scratch-build in the Fedora build system (koji) before?
>
> You could also give the "fedora-review -b 995974" command a try.
Both work g
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=995974
--- Comment #22 from Michael Schwendt ---
Make that:
Spec URL: http://people.midymidy.com/~ekd123/RPM/libbson.spec
SRPM URL: http://people.midymidy.com/~ekd123/RPM/libbson-0.1.10-7.fc19.src.rpm
Have you tried a scratch-build in the Fedora bui
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=995974
--- Comment #21 from Mike Manilone ---
Updated spec file as what the upstream suggested.
Spec URL: http://people.midymidy.com/~ekd123/RPM/libbson.spec
SRPM URL: http://people.midymidy.com/~ekd123/RPM/libbson-0.1.10.7.fc19.src.rpm
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=995974
--- Comment #20 from Mike Manilone ---
%check has been added.
Spec URL: http://people.midymidy.com/~ekd123/RPM/libbson.spec
SRPM URL: http://people.midymidy.com/~ekd123/RPM/libbson-0.1.10-6.fc19.src.rpm
--
You are receiving this mail because
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=995974
--- Comment #19 from Christopher Meng ---
If it has, you should add, otherwise you don't need to do that.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=995974
--- Comment #18 from Mike Manilone ---
Should I add a %check section?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=LwUXAzY3TG&a=cc_unsubscribe
_
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=995974
--- Comment #17 from Michael Schwendt ---
The remainder of the test-suite passes after installing "python-bson" as
BuildRequires.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://b
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=995974
--- Comment #16 from Michael Schwendt ---
It's getting better.
Any response to the bottom of comment 10?
$ make test
/bson/new : PASS : 0.46
/bson/init : PASS : 0.33
/bs
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=995974
--- Comment #15 from Mike Manilone ---
OK. They are now filtered out.
Spec URL: http://people.midymidy.com/~ekd123/RPM/libbson.spec
SRPM URL: http://people.midymidy.com/~ekd123/RPM/libbson-0.1.10-5.fc19.src.rpm
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=995974
--- Comment #14 from Michael Schwendt ---
> "/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/cbson.so.0.0.0 cbson.so.0"
> are the core extension and should not be considered "private".
It _is_ a "private" shared library, because it is not stored in run-tim
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=995974
--- Comment #13 from Mike Manilone ---
The upstream has accepted my patches. Now my package contains no patches =)
Spec URL: http://people.midymidy.com/~ekd123/RPM/libbson.spec
SRPM URL: http://people.midymidy.com/~ekd123/RPM/libbson-0.1.10-4.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=995974
--- Comment #12 from Mike Manilone ---
(In reply to Joshua Small from comment #7)
> However, I'm unsure if your intention should involve filtering the library
> out, or deliberately providing it.
This libraray works well in *my* daily work so
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=995974
--- Comment #11 from Mike Manilone ---
Ah... So many problems :-)
One more thing, "/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/cbson.so.0.0.0 cbson.so.0"
are the core extension and should not be considered "private".
Spec URL: http://people.midymidy.c
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=995974
--- Comment #10 from Michael Schwendt ---
Drive-by comments...
> %build
> ./autogen.sh
Check out the contents of that tiny script. Prefer using autoreconf directly,
so you can skip the duplicate and wrong configure invocation.
> %package
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=995974
--- Comment #9 from Ralf Corsepius ---
(In reply to Joshua Small from comment #7)
> To clarify my point..
>
> The upstream has created a product which, by default, ships with -Werror.
> Whether this is unhelpful is an issue for upstream.
You'r
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=995974
--- Comment #8 from Joshua Small ---
Additional:
Your script runs autogen.sh, followed by ./configure.
The second line of autogen.sh is "./configure", so something is redundant here.
Reading the documentation, once a tarball (stable) is devel
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=995974
--- Comment #7 from Joshua Small ---
To clarify my point..
The upstream has created a product which, by default, ships with -Werror.
Whether this is unhelpful is an issue for upstream.
If the product fails to even compile in a basic environme
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=995974
--- Comment #6 from Mike Manilone ---
OK... I've found out the reason. A patch has been sent to the upstream. The
following src.rpm also includes it.
Spec URL: http://people.midymidy.com/~ekd123/RPM/libbson.spec
SRPM URL: http://people.midymid
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=995974
--- Comment #5 from Mike Manilone ---
This happens in static assertions, so after compiling this library, these
assertions are useless. We can safely disable -Werror.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=995974
Ralf Corsepius changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rc040...@freenet.de
--- Comment #4 fr
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=995974
Joshua Small changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||techn...@lolware.net
--- Comment #3 fro
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=995974
Christopher Meng changed:
What|Removed |Added
Whiteboard||NotReady
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=995974
--- Comment #2 from Mike Manilone ---
Yeah, but this review request could last until the library finally releases
(that's what I expect).
I'm trying to figure out why the compilation failed and patch the package soon.
--
You are receiving th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=995974
Christopher Meng changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||cicku...@gmail.com
--- Comment #1 f
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=995974
Mike Manilone changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR)
--
You are re
38 matches
Mail list logo
