So after my upgrade to 4.0.2, I can no longer get the gaming-registration
url to work. If I try to access it while on the registration VLAN (replace
captive-portal with gaming-registration) it works fine. I have it
configured properly in pf.conf.
Any help would be greatly appreciated...
--
Fletc
Derek Wuelfrath wrote:
> Hey Jason!
>
> Using CDP/LLDP :)
Interesting... :) That makes sense actually. I've been working with
..uh.. "third party" software for so long that logic is a new concept :P
> What is the VoIP device ? On the switch, what is the output of 'something
> something sho
Oh, success, thou art sweet!
I think I have found the culprit. I noticed the default value for the URL
redirect included the trailing slash and my URL did not.
When I added the trailing slash to my URL it worked perfectly, removing the
slash causes the URL to be formatted with the FQDN of the
Hello fellow PacketFence devotees!
CentOS 6.4 fully updated, PF v 4.0.2.
I am having a strange issue with the URL redirection that occurs after a person
registers and their access has been re-evaluated.
I have the options set to force the redirect to my university's home page after
the user re
p.p.s., last work (I think :), I asked our Linux admin why the interfaces would
be disappearing to Packetfence's Configurator, here is the reply:
"Puppet is managing the sudoers file and Packetfence changed the list of
commands that they need access to it. I have fixed the list in Puppet so it
Ok, update time.
I tested it with the force URL feature disabled and the effect is the same,
with the URL being mangled.
Interestingly if I remove my custom URL and use the default URL of
http://www.packetfence.org/ the client is redirected fine...
We must go deeper!
Jake Sallee
Godfather of
Hey Jason!
> How does the "Dynamic Uplinks" option for a switch work?
Using CDP/LLDP :)
> The only thing different here is that there's a VoIP phone on this link
> as well. Is that causing this problem? We allow passthrough for VoIP
> phones, so we need to be able to have both the VoIP phone
Huh. So somehow, after the upgrade to 4.0.2 I do not have a firewall rule
to allow 443 or 80 on the input-management-if chain. In 4.0.1 I have this:
ACCEPT tcp -- anywhere anywhere tcp dpt:https
Adding a rule to iptables.conf to allow https traffic lets it work fine.
I loled at those two last posts :D
Derek
--
dwuelfr...@inverse.ca :: +1.514.447.4918 (x110) :: www.inverse.ca
Inverse inc. :: Leaders behind SOGo (www.sogo.nu) and PacketFence
(www.packetfence.org)
On 2013-07-19, at 9:46 AM, Arthur Emerson III wrote:
> On 7/19/13 3:10 AM, "Ulrich Guimbi" wro
What means this message ?
I receive it on my switch :
%PORT_SECURITY-2-PSECURE_VIOLATION: Security violation occurred, caused by
MAC address 0026.b9b4.4580 on port GigabitEthernet0/15
11-13 rue René Jacques
92131 Issy-les-Moulineaux Cedex - France
www.keynectis.com
GUIMBI Ulrich
Administrateu
Can you forward me what you send because I delete my email of packetfence
users lists every day
11-13 rue René Jacques
92131 Issy-les-Moulineaux Cedex - France
www.keynectis.com
GUIMBI Ulrich
Administrateur Systèmes et Réseaux
T.
+33 (0)1 44 42 00 15
T.
+33 (0)1 55 64 21 21
-Messag
On 7/19/13 3:10 AM, "Ulrich Guimbi" wrote:
>
> Can you forward me what you send because I delete my email of packetfence
> users lists every day
To clarify Jake's response:
1) Open a web browser.
2) Visit this page: http://www.packetfence.org/support/community.html
3) Pick any one of THREE pu
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.networking.packetfence.user/6037/match=jake+sallee
Jake Sallee
Godfather of Bandwidth
System Engineer
University of Mary Hardin-Baylor
900 College St.
Belton, Texas
76513
Fone: 254-295-4658
Phax: 254-295-4221
From: Ul
13 matches
Mail list logo
