Because I installed the new version and there was this new option enabled
by default :)
Nicolas Gailly
On 17 Apr 2015 17:54, "Boris Epstein" wrote:
> Nicolas,
>
> Thanks!
>
> But the upgrade guide doesn't seem to mention bcrypt at all.
>
> Where did you get this text from?
>
> Boris.
>
>
> On Fr
On Apr 17, 2015, at 12:41 , Boris Epstein wrote:
> I also get the following message in my httpd.admin.log:
>
> Apr 17 12:38:11 httpd.admin(10794) ERROR: Database issue: We tried 3 times to
> serve query temporary_password_validate_password_sql called from
> pf::temporary_password::validate_pas
I also get the following message in my httpd.admin.log:
Apr 17 12:38:11 httpd.admin(10794) ERROR: Database issue: We tried 3 times
to serve query temporary_password_validate_password_sql called from
pf::temporary_password::validate_password and we failed. Is the database
running? (pf::db::db_query
OK, I got it, comes from here:
http://www.packetfence.org/news/2015/article/packetfence-v50-released.html
Thanks!
I am still not sure how to remediate this issue though.
Boris.
On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 11:52 AM, Boris Epstein
wrote:
> Nicolas,
>
> Thanks!
>
> But the upgrade guide doesn't see
Nicolas,
Thanks!
But the upgrade guide doesn't seem to mention bcrypt at all.
Where did you get this text from?
Boris.
On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 10:05 AM, Nicolas Gailly
wrote:
> "Local database passwords are now encrypted using bcrypt by default on all
> new installations. The old plaintext
James,
Thanks!
This makes sense, on one hand; on another hand if you have your server on a
regular auto-update schedule that comes in as being highly disruptive as
all of a sudden your PF updates and then stops working.
I guess for now I will just take it off the auto-update schedule by
disablin
Boris,
We do not update automatically the database schema or configuration for
the following reasons.
* PacketFence does not store the MySQL root password database user in
our configurations.
* The PacketFence database user does not have the permission to add and
alter tables.
* This may br
"Local database passwords are now encrypted using bcrypt by default on all
new installations. The old plaintext mode is still supported for legacy
installations and to allow migration to the new mode" ==> bcrypt .. :/
"Added a user named "default" in replacement of the admin one" => that was
I was
Nicolas,
Thanks!
Just tried it - no luck so far, unfortunately.
Anyone know which tables in the DB the relevant data is in? What kind of
encryption is used for the password, etc?
Thanks.
Boris.
On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 3:32 AM, Nicolas Gailly wrote:
> I think the user now is "default" , sho
Hello Nicolas,
i am not sure to really understand what you want to achive.
Since you can use eth0 (switch port access) for management and eth1
(switch port mode trunk) for registration/isolation interface.
Also i will available on #packetfence freenode irc channel if you want
to chat. (in 1 h
Hi,
thanks for the info, it miss in the UPGRADE.asciidoc file but it's
available in the doc :
https://github.com/inverse-inc/packetfence/blob/stable/docs/PacketFence_Administration_Guide.asciidoc#debian-and-ubuntu-1
Regards
Fabrice
Le 2015-04-17 05:48, mourik jan heupink a écrit :
> Ok, I ins
Hi Cheslin,
let's do:
yum cleanall
yum makecache --enablerepo=packetfence
yum update packetfence --enablerepo=packetfence
Regards
Fabrice
Le 2015-04-17 03:14, Bagley, Cheslin (Mr) (Summerstrand Campus North) a
écrit :
When I run command “yum update packetfence --enablerepo=packetfence”,
I
I think the user now is "default" , should be the same password. Keep us
posted!
Nicolas Gailly
On 16 Apr 2015 23:50, "Boris Epstein" wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> All of a sudden, after transitioning to PF v5.0 I can not log into the
> admin web interface as the administrative user I had previously
Hi,
I'm getting an error updating to pf 5.0 on wheezy:
> root@pf:~# apt-get upgrade
> Reading package lists... Done
> Building dependency tree
> Reading state information... Done
> The following packages have been kept back:
> packetfence
> The following packages will be upgraded:
> li
Ok, I installed haproxy from backports, and now things look better.
See: http://haproxy.debian.net/
On 04/17/2015 09:33 AM, mourik jan heupink wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm getting an error updating to pf 5.0 on wheezy:
>
>> root@pf:~# apt-get upgrade
>> Reading package lists... Done
>> Building depende
When I run command "yum update packetfence --enablerepo=packetfence", I get "No
Packages marked for Update". When I checked the current version it shows 4.7.0
Any help to upgrade?
Cheslin Bagley
Network Engineer(Infrastructure)
ICT Services
Nelson Mandela Metropolitan University
North Campus
[De
I am currently resetup PF and I would just like to know whether this is
possible or not, since this is the basics steps to do first ... !
Sorry for uping.
Thanks.
2015-04-16 20:47 GMT+02:00 Nicolas Gailly :
> Hello,
>
> One thing we would like to achieve is the most possible separation between
Hi Max,
There’s some good guidance in the admin guide to implement eduroam and PF which
covers the majority of the config. We required some extra bits here as we
wanted to split off local users to visiting users, and so did that through the
getnormalvlan subroutine in the vlan/custom.pm file wit
18 matches
Mail list logo
