MJ,
You're correct,
mab is a cisco invented hybrid of mac authentication and 802.1x, so 802.1x
is a prerequisite for mab.
-
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IEEE_802.1X#MAB_.28MAC_Authentication_Bypass.29
-
http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/collateral/ios-nx-os-software/identity-bas
On Jun 9, 2015, at 11:39 , heupink wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I too ran into a lot of places where INVERSE (realm) kept popping up.
>
> For us, things got a lot better after I changed the default realm in
> /etc/krb5.conf. Hope this will help you too.
Greetings from Inverse,
Please let me know the
On Jun 9, 2015, at 11:11 ,
wrote:
> Hi Folks,
>
> I want to ask especially the folks at inverse, if there is a recommended
> configuration with pf 5.1 .
> (I mean which distro do YOU recommend, as you do most testing on it at your
> place…)
> Am I right, that you do use RH or centos at IN
Hi,
I too ran into a lot of places where INVERSE (realm) kept popping up.
For us, things got a lot better after I changed the default realm in
/etc/krb5.conf. Hope this will help you too.
MJ
On 6/9/2015 17:11, holger.patz...@t-systems.com wrote:
> Hi Folks,
>
> I want to ask especially the fol
Hi Folks,
I want to ask especially the folks at inverse, if there is a recommended
configuration with pf 5.1 .
(I mean which distro do YOU recommend, as you do most testing on it at your
place...)
Am I right, that you do use RH or centos at INVERSE?
I do ask, because I think I did try nearly ev
Hi All,
I'm planning for deployment of about 4 packetfence servers. The servers
will be doing authentication of WiFi clients. Not inline.
My manager wants me to use LVS as the load balancer in front of the pf
servers. Is this a good option, or does pf have a build in form of load
balancing. I can
Fabrice,
I finally have packet fence partially running. I rebuilt the box and changed
the setup to be inline enforcement. I have two Aerohives and I couldn't find in
the manual how to configure them for inline enforcement. Another issue I am
facing is with the SMS pin verification. I am not re
