Hi Derek,
Thanks for your kind answer!
I've applied the maintenance branch and I'll check it
when I'm back to work again.
Best Regards
Istvan
Fra: Derek Wuelfrath [dwuelfr...@inverse.ca]
Sendt: 11. august 2015 20:10
Til: ML PF
Emne: Re: [PacketFence-users
I just spun up two new servers to do an inline replacement of the older
versions. (4.7 to 5.3.1) Everything is running fine but I am getting entries
into the exceptions log based on graphite/carbon from what I can see. It is the
same error on both servers and they only happen when you go to the
I managed to mess up my status dashboard page. I was cloning one
instance of a packetfence server and I didn't change the IP in the
carbon.conf file before starting it.
So now when I look at the pf1 dashboard I see pf2 data. Is there a way
to recover this, or at least to reset the data so pf1 sh
Hello Istvan,
We just discovered the exact same issue that you described, and have created a
patch.
You can either apply the maintenance branch or apply the patch directly.
Maintenance branch: /usr/local/pf/addons/pf-maint.pl
Patch:
https://github.com/inverse-inc/packetfence/commit/2d89bf1bb30b
Hi
I am using PF 5.2 on Centos 6.6 with inline mode.I have just created a new
profile called 'NEW_PROFILE' and I am using a network filter to allow users
from a particular network to see this 'NEW_PROFILE'.I have a problem.
Unfortunately, none of the static files like css and images show up on t
On Aug 11, 2015, at 9:19 , Dennis Schulmeyer wrote:
> I have to admit that I’m relatively new to this topic… but I’ve read lot’s of
> stuff about it…:)
> So I tried different configurations and found that only a combination of
> linkUp/Down and 802.1x/MAB can satisfy our needs.
> What I don’t
Hi,
On my 5.3.1 installation running on Debian Wheezy the "Unregistration"
time is not set
when the node is registered via email. The sponsor and sms registration
is working OK.
I've checked the settings in /Users/Sources/email/catchcall and the "Set
access duration"
is sat til "1 day".
Is the
damn right… thank you for the hint Louis!
# yum upgrade freeradius —enablerepo=packetfence
only.. was not enough.., but
# rpm -e —nodeps freeradius freeradius-ldap freeradius-mysql freeradius-perl
freeradius-utils
and
# yum install freeradius freeradius-ldap freeradius-mysql freeradius-perl
fr
You upgraded radius from the wrong repository.
Try
# yum upgrade freeradius —enablerepo=packetfence
Regards,
--
Louis Munro
lmu...@inverse.ca :: www.inverse.ca
+1.514.447.4918 x125 :: +1 (866) 353-6153 x125
Inverse inc. :: Leaders behind SOGo (www.sogo.nu) and PacketFence
(www.packetfence.o
Oh.. Sorry for the misunderstanding…
The hint http://sourceforge.net/p/packetfence/mailman/message/34280896/
worked for packetfence 5.2.x.
-> Now, with 5.3.1 I have still the problem described below!
So I didn’t change the configuration back to default after upgrading to 5.3.1 ..
..for now I can’
whuaa!
I did a "yum upgrade" today.. and now my radiusd doesn’t come up..
radius.log says: Error: /usr/local/pf/raddb//modules/raw[1]: Failed to link to
module 'rlm_raw': file not found
radius version is freeradius-2.2.6-4.el6.x86_64 now…
can anybody help me please?
thanks!
Dennis
Hi Dennis,
Yes, I wanted to point you to this solution, and forgot. I'm sorry.
So for you things work also, now? Nice, it's just so strange that
undocumented hacks are needed to get something (relatively common, i
think..) to work.
I had also hoped that this bugfix in packetfence 5.3.0:
• Fixe
Brian,
There is no actual fix to be pushed in the maintenance since it affects
existing portal-profile which are not managed by the upgrade process…
We are working on a better way to handle thoses files, but for the moment,
you’ll have to take care of them manually.
Cheers!
dw.
—
Derek Wuelfr
Is this fix going to make the maintenance script soon? I have the same
issue with phone, carriers, and sponsor email showing regardless of source
selected.
Brian
On Wed, Aug 5, 2015, 10:33 Chris Abel wrote:
> Works perfectly! Thanks!
>
> On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 11:08 AM, Derek Wuelfrath
> wrote
Hi Louis,
I’ve followed this hint
http://sourceforge.net/p/packetfence/mailman/message/34280896/ to get machine
accounts work properly..
So my configuration is:
realm.conf
[TESTDOMAIN]
domain=TESTSERVER
options=strip
[TESTDOMAIN.COM]
domain=TESTSERVER
options=strip
[NULL]
domain=TESTSERVER
o
Hi Louis,
I’m sorry, I forgot to answer to your comments in the log dump… :/
Please look for my comments in the log below…
I have to admit that I’m relatively new to this topic… but I’ve read lot’s of
stuff about it…:)
So I tried different configurations and found that only a combination of
lin
As Fabrice suggested, with RHEL, just needed the right repo, openfusion
repo did the trick:
yum update --enablerepo=PacketFence,epel,rpmforge,of
On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 2:39 PM, Rossing, Will wrote:
> Thanks Fabrice,
>
>
> These are perl modules and what's strange is, I use cpan and install them
Hi Louis,
I have to admit that I’m relatively new to this topic… but I’ve read lot’s of
stuff about it…:)
So I tried different configurations and found that only a combination of
linkUp/Down and 802.1x/MAB can satisfy our needs.
What I don’t understand is how a new IP assignment should work with
18 matches
Mail list logo
