Re: [PacketFence-users] Captive Portal Replacement - Packetfence???

Hello Cory, what you describe is WLC web authentication. It mean that the device stay on the same layer 2 network and is redirected to the captive portal if the device is unreg. For the flow policy you can use the wlc qos for that. http://www.packetfence.org/downloads/PacketFence/doc/PacketF

[PacketFence-users] Captive Portal Replacement - Packetfence???

Hello (new to the forum) - I've been tasked with a captive portal replacement for our companies currently paid solution - sure we all know the 'green monster' with an 'X'. I've read through deployment and admin guides but our needs require a very vanilla offering to our customers - hospitality in

Re: [PacketFence-users] Suricata alerts to Packet Fence (Derek, Wuelfrath)

cboley@SRVCHPACKETFENCE:~$ cat /usr/local/pf/conf/pf-release PacketFence 5.3.1 -Original Message- From: packetfence-users-requ...@lists.sourceforge.net [mailto:packetfence-users-requ...@lists.sourceforge.net] Sent: Monday, November 09, 2015 12:10 PM To: packetfence-users@lists.sourceforg

Re: [PacketFence-users] Client (with inline enforcement) not added to ipset

Nicola, Is the DHCP handled by PacketFence for the inline segment ? A locationlog entry is required by PacketFence to modify iptables / ipset. The message you are getting seems to state that no such entry exists. A locationlog, in inline, is created / modified by DHCP Cheers! dw. — Derek Wuelf

[PacketFence-users] How to secure sponsored access?

Hi there, We have Packetfence 5.4 now working for staff using PF PKI and EAP via radius back to AD. Role based vlan swap from registration portal profile vlan to secure hidden SSID vlan works. We are now trying to setup parallel SSIDs and config for sponsored guest access. Sponsor can approve a

[PacketFence-users] R: R: Meraki and PF

They suggested me to open a request for enhancement…. I agree with you, they will never implement this feature. Regards M Da: Louis Munro [mailto:lmu...@inverse.ca] Inviato: lunedì 16 novembre 2015 15.46 A: packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net Oggetto: Re: [PacketFence-users] R: Meraki and P

[PacketFence-users] Client (with inline enforcement) not added to ipset

Hello. I have an installation of PacketFence under Debian (armhf). Everythong seems to work, but when the ures logs in (or when I put the node in "registered" state), its ip/MAC aren't added to ipset. I get this in pfmon.log: > Can't re-evaluate access because no open locationlog entry was found

Re: [PacketFence-users] PacketFence PKI issue

Hi, So I've finally got around to doing some further troubleshooting on this connection issue via tracing on the windows machine. It appears that there is something wrong with the server cert signature that the windows client can't verify. I am getting this in the client TLS logs: [960] 11-17 15: