Re: [PacketFence-users] VLAN assigment by RADIUS

So it mean that there is no rule that match it.tech username in your AD source. Try pftest authentication it.tech bob and see if the AD source return a role and an unregdate. Fabrice Le 2018-01-29 à 20:39, E.P. a écrit : Well, that’s my problem, Fabrice, I’ve already checked that log, n

Re: [PacketFence-users] VLAN assigment by RADIUS

I’m pulling my hair now in despair … I added few more WAP to switches.conf file and restarted RADIUS. Trying to authenticate as a valid user and it is successful (as it says in RADIUS audit log) But the endpoint can’t communicate at all via IP and it can’t even request IP address via DHCP.

Re: [PacketFence-users] VLAN assigment by RADIUS

Well, that’s my problem, Fabrice, I’ve already checked that log, nothing in there ;) RADIUS Request User-Name = "it.tech" NAS-IP-Address = 172.19.254.2 NAS-Port = 0 Framed-MTU = 1400 State = 0xe7795756e6bf4d151b0bfaeaef977462 Called-Station-Id = "24:a4:3c:5e:c1:11:staff-secured" Calling-St

Re: [PacketFence-users] VLAN assigment by RADIUS

Hello Eugene, check in the radius audit log, you will see the radius answer. Regards Fabrice Le 2018-01-29 à 19:41, E.P. via PacketFence-users a écrit : Guys, How can I see if a specific VLAN ID that I assigned to the switch (or rather WAP) in “Role by VLAN ID” setting. I have it as fo

Re: [PacketFence-users] Bandwidth accounting

Well, I'd rather paraphrase my question as to how to use available "Bandwidth limit" violation to limit a user session based on a specific bandwidth value. Eugene From: E.P. [mailto:ype...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, January 29, 2018 3:04 PM To: packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net Subjec

[PacketFence-users] VLAN assigment by RADIUS

Guys, How can I see if a specific VLAN ID that I assigned to the switch (or rather WAP) in “Role by VLAN ID” setting. I have it as follows (extract from switches.conf file) StaffRole=10 StaffVlan=10 Should I take into account not a very good marriage of Ubiquiti Unifi and FreeRADIUS

Re: [PacketFence-users] Will bandwidth limit violation limits allusers ?

Hi Fabrice, Thank you for your reply. You said this violation is not enabled by default, but I keep finding the violation logs such as ??Violation 123 force closed for device xx??. Why does it keep logging this ? -- Original -- From: packetfence-users

Re: [PacketFence-users] Bandwidth accounting

Hello Eugene, you need to have radius accounting enabled on your NAS and create a violation for that. Regards Fabrice Le 2018-01-29 à 18:04, E.P. via PacketFence-users a écrit : Folks, I’m trying to understand how to enable violations for bandwidth with accounting Looking at this you

Re: [PacketFence-users] Vlan Pooling Question

Hello Peter, glad to heard that it works . Regards Fabrice Le 2018-01-29 à 14:44, Truax, Peter via PacketFence-users a écrit : Fabrice, I just wanted to give you some feedback on vlan pooling. We upgraded to 7.4 today. We entered vlan numbers 600,601 into the role for the switch and it

Re: [PacketFence-users] pfappserver::Controller::Node broken after update to 7.4

Hello Cristian, i am able to reproduce it, we will provide a fix soon. Regards Fabrice Le 2018-01-29 à 07:17, Cristian Mammoli via PacketFence-users a écrit : Hi, after updating to 7.4 I have the following issues in the admin portal: Restart switchport on the node details show: *Error!* A

Re: [PacketFence-users] Will bandwidth limit violation limits all users?

Hello Yan, where do you see that it's still enabled ? Regards Fabrice Le 2018-01-29 ?? 08:04, Yan via PacketFence-users a ??crit?0?2: Is there a way to disable violation 123 ? It can??t be stopped by disable it in violation menu in admin GUI. -- Original -

Re: [PacketFence-users] unregister user automaticaly after inactivity period

Hello Sebastien, Le 2018-01-29 à 07:41, Sebastien Augen via PacketFence-users a écrit : Hi all, We are testing packetfence(7.3.0), and it's working as expected. I'm wondering if there is a way to unregister user after inactivity period ... Our goal is to register users evry time they are conn

Re: [PacketFence-users] Question regarding installation on Debian Stretch as well as packaging questions...

Hello Rusty, PacketFence is not still available in Strech, i have issue with wmi. Le 2018-01-29 à 00:01, Rusty Deaton via PacketFence-users a écrit : Hey there, So I tried installing on Debian Stretch (Debian 9) yesterday, and got all sorts of nasty errors RE: unmet dependencies, a lot like

Re: [PacketFence-users] Will bandwidth limit violation limits all users ?

Hello Yan, this violation is not enabled by default. Also if the violation is triggered then you will see it in pfmon.log and you will probably see deauth request in packetfence.log. Regards Fabrice Le 2018-01-27 ?? 04:32, Yan via PacketFence-users a ??crit?0?2: Hi dear user, Recently

Re: [PacketFence-users] Packetfence with Ruckus

Hello Yan, funny, you can tell the network team that they find a way to crash the ruckus controller ;-) More seriously even if PacketFence return crap the controller is not supposed to crash,?0?2 so did you check the ruckus logs , did you asked the ruckus support ? I remember a story like

Re: [PacketFence-users] R: R: No client IP update in cluster

It looks like you probably have a high number of job waiting in the queue, take a look on the admin gui to see how many. Le 2018-01-25 à 11:24, luca comes via PacketFence-users a écrit : Hi Fabrice, I then installed dhcp forwarder on my DHCP and I can see traffic arrive with tcpdump. The clie

Re: [PacketFence-users] Apple devices - Captive Portal

Thanks, good to know. Le 2018-01-26 à 05:46, Luís Torres via PacketFence-users a écrit : Hi Fabrice, I found that we have to enable on the wlc5508 , Fast SSID change on the General settings. That seems to cause a delay when you change between ssids. LT Em 2018-01-20 02:08, Durand fabrice

Re: [PacketFence-users] Number of registered devices notification

Hello Dias, not yet, i have to find some time to test it. Regards Fabrice Le 2018-01-25 à 11:18, Raphael Dias a écrit : Hi Durand! Any news about this one? Could you reproduce this? Thanks in advance Raphael Dias On Sat, Jan 20, 2018 at 12:12 AM, Durand fabrice

[PacketFence-users] Bandwidth accounting

Folks, I'm trying to understand how to enable violations for bandwidth with accounting Looking at this youtube video example but don't see it could be done in the current version of PF. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7nSrYKkX7wk The only section on Violations is under Configuration - Complianc

Re: [PacketFence-users] Vlan Pooling Question

Fabrice, I just wanted to give you some feedback on vlan pooling. We upgraded to 7.4 today. We entered vlan numbers 600,601 into the role for the switch and it worked perfectly! Thank you so much. I feel like it's Christmas and I got just what I wanted. Ha ha. Peter From: Durand fabrice via P

Re: [PacketFence-users] R: R: R: Can't synchronize new cluster databases

Thanks Luca, I read that same file on Friday and noted that those ports were only opened for high-availability interfaces, which I had not defined. So, I configured all the management interfaces as high-availability and resynced the nodes, then database synchronization worked perfectly! Thanks

Re: [PacketFence-users] pfappserver::Controller::Node broken after update to 7.4

Same goes with the WMI tab in the node properties. Il 29/01/2018 13:17, Cristian Mammoli via PacketFence-users ha scritto: Hi, after updating to 7.4 I have the following issues in the admin portal: Restart switchport on the node details show: *Error!* An error occured while contacting the serv

[PacketFence-users] unregister user automaticaly after inactivity period

Hi all, We are testing packetfence(7.3.0), and it's working as expected. I'm wondering if there is a way to unregister user after inactivity period ... Our goal is to register users evry time they are connecting trought the portal auth and not as it's acting at the moment.(PacketFence remembers u

[PacketFence-users] Question regarding installation on Debian Stretch as well as packaging questions...

Hey there, So I tried installing on Debian Stretch (Debian 9) yesterday, and got all sorts of nasty errors RE: unmet dependencies, a lot like what happened in this closed Github issue: https://github.com/inverse-inc/packetfence/issues/1462 . As far as I am aware, Debian 8 has been superseded by

Re: [PacketFence-users] Will bandwidth limit violation limits all users?

Is there a way to disable violation 123 ? It can??t be stopped by disable it in violation menu in admin GUI. -- Original -- From: packetfence-users Date: ,1?? 28,2018 06:15 To: packetfence-users Cc: Yan <1136723...@qq.com> Subject: Re: [PacketFence-users

[PacketFence-users] pfappserver::Controller::Node broken after update to 7.4

Hi, after updating to 7.4 I have the following issues in the admin portal: Restart switchport on the node details show: *Error!* An error occured while contacting the server. Please try again later. Deregistering a node show: *Error!* An error condition has occured. See server side logs for de

[PacketFence-users] R: R: R: Can't synchronize new cluster databases

Hi Jason, I didn't remember to tell you the same. I also had to change iptables settings because as default ports for galera sync are opened only on the high availability interface but every node point to the real management Ip instead. So I added on each node two lines in /usl/loca/pf/conf/ipat