Hello Steven,
169.254.0.0 is a virtual interface to be able to link a virtual network
namespace used by the chroot where winbind is running.
Can you post the result of:
ip a
and the content of /usr/local/pf/var/conf/iptables.conf
Regards
Fabrice
Le 2018-06-14 à 17:39, Steven Pfister
Hello Hajar,
when you fill the form then PacketFence send a email to the sponsor.
So you need to be sure that the smtp configuration is correct or you can
install postfix.
Regards
Fabrice
Le 2018-06-14 à 17:33, hajar benjat via PacketFence-users a écrit :
Hello
I wanna ask u ... I
Hello
I wanna ask u ... I create a user I mark it as sponsor and I go to the user
and I want to singup using sponsor based registration
When I set an email and I set the sponsor email ... it show me pending
approval ... Why I can't connect to internet ?
Regards
Le jeu. 31 mai 2018 2:40 AM,
We are in the middle of trying to join our AD server in order to
authenticate against it. After adding our domain, it's not able to join it.
It's added a virtual interface and some routing for the 169.254.0.0
network. I'm not sure what the routing table is supposed to look like. I'm
having trouble
In PacketFence we do a person lookup (fetch info from ldap) when a
802.1x user connect on the network so indirectly you can have the google
information from the AD.
Le 2018-06-14 à 10:05, Steve Pfister via PacketFence-users a écrit :
I've heard that you can sync accounts between your Active
I've notived that, but I needed a system that could aggregate different
MACs and/or users' access logs specifically under their identification. So
far I haven't had the time to check these options presented, hope I can
return soon!
Em qui, 14 de jun de 2018 09:40, Fabrice Durand via
I've heard that you can sync accounts between your Active Directory and
Google. Can you do the same between Google and local Packetfence accounts?
--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
Hi,
We are installing packetfence and we have a lot of HPE 1920 and 1910.
I'm testing them with packetfence but i'm having a strange behavior.
Packetfence receive the Radius request, the port received the registration
VLAN but the switch port is not good in the interface: we only see "port 0".
I
You just need to join the PacketFence server to the domain.
Le 2018-06-14 à 08:42, Geert Heremans via PacketFence-users a écrit :
Thanks Fabrice,
just to be sure. I use the PF radius server for the WPA2
authentication then and not NPS on Windows Server 2016?
2018-06-14 14:39 GMT+02:00
Hello Josh,
Le 2018-06-14 à 03:42, Josh Nathan via PacketFence-users a écrit :
Hi Fabrice,
For what it's worth, I've found the same results on both PacketFence
6.4 and 8.0.
And yes, I did/do have packetfence-local-auth enabled.
Our goal is to use an external RADIUS server for
Thanks Fabrice,
just to be sure. I use the PF radius server for the WPA2 authentication
then and not NPS on Windows Server 2016?
2018-06-14 14:39 GMT+02:00 Fabrice Durand via PacketFence-users <
packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net>:
> Hello Geert,
>
> since wpa2-entreprise already
Btw the new pfdns in go provide this information in the log.
Le 2018-06-14 à 03:15, mj via PacketFence-users a écrit :
Hi,
We have (kind of) solved this by logging dns requests done by the
inline clients, plus their mac address. We are using this:
https://github.com/gamelinux/passivedns
Hello Geert,
since wpa2-entreprise already authenticate the user (AD credential) then
you can auto register device in this case and no need to have the
captive portal.
Regards
Fabrice
Le 2018-06-14 à 02:52, Geert Heremans via PacketFence-users a écrit :
Hello everyone,
I'm wondering if
Hello everyone,
I'm wondering if it's possible to setup my PF system so that I don't need a
unsecured SSID with a Captive Portal behind it to allow the users to
register their device.
In my ideal setup I would have only one SSID with WPA2-Enterprise
authentication. When one fo my domain users
I'll give it a try, thanks!
Em qui, 14 de jun de 2018 04:30, mj via PacketFence-users <
packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net> escreveu:
> Hi,
>
> We have (kind of) solved this by logging dns requests done by the inline
> clients, plus their mac address. We are using this:
>
>
Hi,
Have a look at the packetfence documentation.
You can implement your own certificates for the radius server.
https://packetfence.org/doc/PacketFence_Installation_Guide.html#_pki_integration
For example we use a Windows Server CA and we deploy the certificates via
Group Policy to our
Hi
Would you be able to assist with an issue I have found with our PacketFence
system, I have a "visitor" role configured with a max number of devices allowed
to be registered at 2. I manually created a test account and assigned it the
"visitor" role. I've just tested this and the max number of
Hi Fabrice,
For what it's worth, I've found the same results on both PacketFence 6.4
and 8.0.
And yes, I did/do have packetfence-local-auth enabled.
Our goal is to use an external RADIUS server for authentication. However,
the RADIUS server doesn't store the realm identification as part of the
Hi,
We have (kind of) solved this by logging dns requests done by the inline
clients, plus their mac address. We are using this:
https://github.com/gamelinux/passivedns
We run a cron script to purge the collected data after x number of days.
MJ
On 06/13/2018 03:52 PM, Murilo Calegari via
19 matches
Mail list logo
