[PacketFence-users] Packetfence Graphs

Hello, Just out of curiosity - what tool/engine runs the dashboard graphs? I think they look great and would be a good tool to have for some other projects. Thanks! Austin Lawrence, CCNP R&S | System Administrator ___ PacketFence-users mailing list

Re: [PacketFence-users] Packetfence Graphs

Hello Austin, we use netdata for the graph. (https://github.com/netdata/netdata) Regards Fabrice Le 20-01-15 à 09 h 02, Austin Lawrence via PacketFence-users a écrit : Hello, Just out of curiosity - what tool/engine runs the dashboard graphs? I think they look great and would be a good

Re: [PacketFence-users] Packetfence Graphs

I believe they are based on Netdata -- https://www.netdata.cloud/. Max -- Max McGrath Infrastructure and Security Manager Carthage College 262-551- mmcgr...@carthage.edu On Wed, Jan 15, 2020 at 8:47 AM Austin Lawrence via PacketFence-users

[PacketFence-users] Clients not disconnecting when deregistered

I have had trouble the past couple versions of packetfence. When I deregistered a client in the web interface, the clients would instantly disconnect from WiFi. The current behavior is that it stays connected to Wifi but just has no network access. Is this correct or should the WLC kick the client

[PacketFence-users] VLAN Filters & Unregistration Date

We're trying to create a VLAN filter to keep our devices perpetually registered by adding 3 months of time to the unregdate so devices that are used regularly remain registered and devices that aren't fall out of registration after 3 months from the last use. Looking at some threads I see that

Re: [PacketFence-users] Portal/RADIUS Behavior - Post-Registration

The problem with the dpsk provisioner that displays the page with "Here is your key for SSID: Whatever" is there is no way to continue on from there that I see. Is there a link I can put on that page that will register the node to the user and then send a RADIUS disconnect request to boot them f

Re: [PacketFence-users] VLAN Filters & Unregistration Date

After doing a little digging it appears that the valid_date regex is: /^\d{4}\-((0[1-9])|(1[0-2]))\-((0[1-9])|([12][0-9])|(3[0-1]))\s+(([01][0-9])|(2[0-3]))(:[0-5][0-9]){2}$/ Which only accepts -MM-dd hh:mm:ss and doesn't accept an access duration as https://sourceforge.net/p/packetfence/mail

Re: [PacketFence-users] VLAN Filters & Unregistration Date

And digging some more, it looks like the message is merely a warning when the date runs through that function. The unreg date is actually being updated, however the node detail page fields are being cached by the browser and require a cache refresh to display the updated information. -Ryan T

Re: [PacketFence-users] MAC bypass and recommendations

Hello Oskar, in fact when you do mac authentication the status of the node in packetfence is the "User" in that case. So just reg the mac and assign a role and you will be ok. Regards Fabrice Le 20-01-14 à 16 h 40, oskar svedman via PacketFence-users a écrit : Hi, Need some guidelines and

Re: [PacketFence-users] sql_reject: Insufficient space to store pair string

Hello Fabian, it's a buffer issue in Freeradius and we can't fix it now. We have to wait Freeradius 4 for that. Regards Fabrice Le 20-01-09 à 07 h 16, Fabian Hubacher via PacketFence-users a écrit : Hi Guys I have an issue with my packetfence installation. I try to connect a Windows 10 not

Re: [PacketFence-users] Clients not disconnecting when deregistered

Hello Andrew, you should check on the wlc log to see what happen. Regards Fabrice Le 20-01-15 à 11 h 08, Lierman, Andrew via PacketFence-users a écrit : I have had trouble the past couple versions of packetfence. When I deregistered a client in the web interface, the clients would instantly

[PacketFence-users] Applying Violations to all a users devices

Good Morning all, I have the following use case: - A user is allowed 500MB/Day data allowance. - A user may have more then once device - Once a user exceeds their 500MB/day they are not permitted any further access until the next day. I know that I can set violations per node, but I do not see