Hi guys, I hope you are fine.
I have created a captive portal for network authentication, but I have a
very strange problem, after authentication in captive portal, dhcp puts a
different gateway than configured in PF.
For example, after authentication it changes the gateway to 172.20.0.129.
Does
"172.20.0.65",
"optionSubnetMask": "255.255.255.224"
},
"percentfree": 100,
"percentused": 0,
"size": 29,
"status": "Normal",
"used": 0
},
{
Iam have the same problema topic below, but in this topic the brother
Luca, did not describe a solution, or at least I could not understand.
https://www.mail-archive.com/packetfence-users@lists.
sourceforge.net/msg13372.html
Any can help me?
Att,
André
---
Hey Luca,
u can describe your solutiom? I have the same problema, but still I did
not solve it.
--
Att
*André*
--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http:/
I'm configuring pf as vlan enforcement, but I'm having a problem, where
vlans with their respective IPs are not being assigned. In the logs it
returns the correct vlans, but does not apply to the station.
*Dec 29 11:36:54 packtfence packetfence_httpd.aaa: httpd.aaa(5185) INFO:
[mac:64:1c:67:82:7d
k.
>
> Last things, be sure that enp0s8 is plugged on a trunk port and be sure
> that you define all the vlans in your switch configuration.
>
> Regards
> Fabrice
>
>
>
>
> Le 2017-12-29 à 08:50, André Scrivener via PacketFence-users a écrit :
>
> I'm
ic" ro
> exit
>
> console#
>
>
>
>
> I still do not understand where the error is. Any idea
>
>
> 2017-12-29 11:15 GMT-03:00 Fabrice Durand via PacketFence-users <
> packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net>:
>
>> Hello André,
>>
>>
ce"
>> usage 802.1x
>> key "useStrongerSecret"
>> exit
>> !
>> interface Gi1/0/11
>> switchport mode trunk
>> switchport trunk allowed vlan 1-5,100
>> dot1x port-control force-authorized
>> exit
>> !
>> interface Gi1/0
oftware Version 6.2.6.6
>>> !
>>> configure
>>> vlan 2-5,10,100
>>> exit
>>> vlan 2
>>> name "Registration"
>>> exit
>>> vlan 3
>>> name "Isolation"
>>> exit
>>> vlan 4
>>> na
under
> Configuration) in PacketFence to RADIUS and specify the secret key. Please
> let me know if this doesn’t work.
>
> Thanks,
> Tim
>
> Sent from mobile phone
>
> On Jan 3, 2018, at 14:59, André Scrivener via PacketFence-users <
> packetfence-users@lists.sour
Hey Timonthy,
Following my network.conf
[root@packetfence ~]# cat /usr/local/pf/conf/networks.conf
[192.168.3.0]
dns=192.168.3.2
dhcp_start=192.168.3.10
gateway=192.168.3.2
domain-name=vlan-isolation.scrivener.com.br
nat_enabled=disabled
named=enabled
dhcp_max_lease_time=30
fake_mac_enabled=disab
Hey Timonthy and Fabrice!
Finally funcioning, the problem was on firmware, after update, is changing
the vlans successfully.
Thank you so much for help!
Now I will move forward.
One question, this log below, its because i dont implement a radius.
Correct? I only join packetfence on Active Dire
Hey guys!
I'm enabling nessus to scan hosts, but I'm trying out these logs below:
Jan 10 18:33:25 packetfence pfqueue: pfqueue(12693) INFO:
[mac:84:7b:eb:e5:ea:e2] Instantiate profile default
(pf::Connection::ProfileFactory::_from_profile)
Jan 10 18:33:26 packetfence pfqueue: pfqueue(12693) INF
>
>> Le 2018-01-10 à 15:59, André Scrivener via PacketFence-users a écrit :
>> Hey guys!
>>
>>
>> I'm enabling nessus to scan hosts, but I'm trying out these logs below:
>>
>>
>> Jan 10 18:33:25 packetfence pfqueue: pfqueue(12693)
;
> Hello Fabrice,
>
> Last version for centos 7!
>
> Version is Nessus 7.
>
> Regards,
> André
>
> Em 10 de jan de 2018, às 18:14, Fabrice Durand via PacketFence-users <
> packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net> escreveu:
>
> Hello André,
>
;>
>> Fabrice
>>
>>
>>
>> Le 2018-01-10 à 17:53, André Scrivener a écrit :
>>
>> Hello Fabrice,
>>
>> Last version for centos 7!
>>
>> Version is Nessus 7.
>>
>> Regards,
>> André
>>
>> Em 10 de jan de 2018, às 18:14, Fab
;
>>
>> 2018-01-10 20:50 GMT-03:00 Durand fabrice :
>>
>>> Hello André,
>>>
>>> so you have to choose nessus6 and not nessus.
>>>
>>> Restart
>>>
>>> Fabrice
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Le 2018-01-10
Hi Timonthy,
thx for feedback, but i noticed that if it is in radius modes the
deauthentication does not work, if put HTTP for example it works.
Regards,
André
2018-01-10 22:12 GMT-03:00 Timothy Mullican :
> André,
> You can ignore that error. It is caused by a missing parameter in the
> confi
joined to domain before and the rejoin didn't work. So I
> removed it from the AD and rebuilt the procedure.
>
>
> Luca
>
>
> Inviato da Outlook <http://aka.ms/weboutlook>
>
>
> ------
> *Da:* André Scrivener via PacketFence-users s
Hello Timonthy,
I will do that today and give you the answer.
Regards,
André
2018-01-11 17:47 GMT-03:00 Timothy Mullican :
> André,
> Try applying this patch. On the PacketFence box, do:
>
> # cd /usr/local/pf
> # wget https://patch-diff.githubusercontent.com/raw/
> inverse-inc/packetfence/pull
Hello,
Your switch is using the latest firmware version?
Regards,
André
> Em 7 de fev de 2018, às 10:27, Rana, Vijaykumar via PacketFence-users
> escreveu:
>
> Hello ,
> I have a Dell S3048ON Switch, on which I have some VLANs configured and also
> I have configured 802.1X on a port which is
21 matches
Mail list logo
