Hello,
Does anyone have experience using PacketFence Radius with network switch
authentication? I would only need basic Active Directory integration and
authentication and point the switch authentication to PacketFence Radius.
The information transmitted, including any attachments, is intended
Why not use Fingerbank? Maybe just MAC OUI and vendor somehow?
Thank you,
Louis Scaringella
Security Systems Engineer
Yellow Dog Networks
785-342-7903
> On Dec 31, 2020, at 5:36 PM, NITISH AGGARWAL via PacketFence-users
> wrote:
>
>
> Hi,
>
> I have deployed Packetfence in my private(not
Instantiate profile Lab-Aruba-OpenGuest-copy
> (pf::Connection::ProfileFactory::_from_profile)
>
>
> Louis Scaringella
> Security Systems Engineer
> Yellow Dog Networks, Inc
> 785-342-7903
>
>> On Oct 8, 2020, at 4:03 PM, Louis Scaringella via PacketFence-users
>> w
mac:00:24:d6:5b:30:bc] Instantiate profile Lab-Aruba-OpenGuest-copy
(pf::Connection::ProfileFactory::_from_profile)
Louis Scaringella
Security Systems Engineer
Yellow Dog Networks, Inc
785-342-7903
> On Oct 8, 2020, at 4:03 PM, Louis Scaringella via PacketFence-users
> wrote:
>
> A
t; Regards
>>>>
>>>> Fabrice
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Le 20-10-08 à 14 h 37, Louis Scaringella a écrit :
>>>>> What would cause the httpd.aaa process to match the correct profile but
>>>>> then the httpd.portal to match the
something just isn’t right here.
Louis Scaringella
Security Systems Engineer
Yellow Dog Networks, Inc
785-342-7903
> On Oct 8, 2020, at 12:11 PM, Louis Scaringella via PacketFence-users
> wrote:
>
> From the Aruba.pm switch file I see this:
>
>
> sub extractSsid {
>my
abrice
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Le 20-10-08 à 14 h 37, Louis Scaringella a écrit :
>>>>> What would cause the httpd.aaa process to match the correct profile but
>>>>> then the httpd.portal to match the default?
>>>>> Does it not use the sa
rofileFactory::_from_profile)
>>>>>>>>> Oct 7 13:09:00 localhost packetfence_httpd.portal:
>>>>>>>>> httpd.portal(2656) WARN: [mac:00:24:d6:5b:30:bc] locale from the URL
>>>>>>>>> is not supported
>>>>>>>>
tion profile so something just isn’t right here.
>>
>> Louis Scaringella
>> Security Systems Engineer
>> Yellow Dog Networks, Inc
>> 785-342-7903
>>
>>> On Oct 8, 2020, at 12:11 PM, Louis Scaringella via PacketFence-users
>>> wrote:
>>>
>
;> connection profile so something just isn’t right here.
>>
>> Louis Scaringella
>> Security Systems Engineer
>> Yellow Dog Networks, Inc
>> 785-342-7903
>>
>>> On Oct 8, 2020, at 12:11 PM, Louis Scaringella via PacketFence-users
>>> wrote:
oEAP,switch_mac =>
>>>> (20:4c:03:58:99:8a), mac => [00:24:d6:5b:30:bc], port => 0, username =>
>>>> "00-24-d6-5b-30-bc" (pf::radius::authorize)
>>>> Oct 7 13:09:02 localhost packetfence_httpd.aaa: httpd.aaa(2063) INFO:
>>>> [ma
ce(s) :
>>>> 'local,file1,LabDC,LabDC-TestSponsor' for realm 'null'
>>>> (pf::config::util::filter_authentication_sources)
>>>> Oct 7 13:09:02 localhost packetfence_httpd.aaa: httpd.aaa(2063) INFO:
>>>> [mac:00:24:d6:5b:30:bc] Connection type i
eless-802.11-NoEAP,switch_mac =>
>>>> (20:4c:03:58:99:8a), mac => [00:24:d6:5b:30:bc], port => 0, username =>
>>>> "00-24-d6-5b-30-bc" (pf::radius::authorize)
>>>> Oct 7 13:09:02 localhost packetfence_httpd.aaa: httpd.aaa(2063) INFO:
>>>> [mac
"00-24-d6-5b-30-bc" (pf::radius::authorize)
>>>> Oct 7 13:09:02 localhost packetfence_httpd.aaa: httpd.aaa(2063) INFO:
>>>> [mac:00:24:d6:5b:30:bc] Instantiate profile default
>>>> (pf::Connection::ProfileFactory::_from_profile)
>>>> Oct 7 13:09:02 loca
bc" (pf::radius::authorize)
>>>> Oct 7 13:09:02 localhost packetfence_httpd.aaa: httpd.aaa(2063) INFO:
>>>> [mac:00:24:d6:5b:30:bc] Instantiate profile default
>>>> (pf::Connection::ProfileFactory::_from_profile)
>>>> Oct 7 13:09:02 localhost
Is the information in the request sufficient for this to be fixed? I can
provide anything else you may need on the Aruba side to help.
Louis Scaringella
Security Systems Engineer
Yellow Dog Networks, Inc
785-342-7903
> On Oct 7, 2020, at 1:12 PM, Louis Scaringella via PacketFence-us
Security Systems Engineer
Yellow Dog Networks, Inc
785-342-7903
> On Oct 7, 2020, at 12:39 PM, Louis Scaringella via PacketFence-users
> wrote:
>
> I’ll try and capture that shortly.
>
> Just as a comparison, whenever I use a PacketFence local user that I create
> to
t; 785-342-7903
>>
>>> On Oct 7, 2020, at 8:17 AM, Fabrice Durand via PacketFence-users
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello Louis,
>>>
>>> can you provide the packetfence.log when you authenticate and hit the
>>> portal ?
>>>
>>> Reg
f::Switch::getVlanByName)
>> Oct 7 13:09:02 localhost packetfence_httpd.aaa: httpd.aaa(2063) INFO:
>> [mac:00:24:d6:5b:30:bc] Updating locationlog from accounting request
>> (pf::api::handle_accounting_metadata)
>> Louis Scaringella
>> Security Systems Engineer
for some reason.
Louis Scaringella
Security Systems Engineer
Yellow Dog Networks, Inc
785-342-7903
> On Oct 7, 2020, at 12:24 PM, Louis Scaringella via PacketFence-users
> wrote:
>
> Thank you. I am using that name and just verified that is how it shows in AD
> exactly.
>>>>>>> When you click on the link then the portal ask you to authenticate with
>>>>>>> the sponsor credential but the format of the username depend of the
>>>>>>> username attribute you defined (like sAMAccountName or
> What i think it's probably because of the username attribute in the AD
>>>>> authentication source.
>>>>>
>>>>> When you set a sponsor in the portal then packetfence try to find the
>>>>> email address in the AD and check if the user account is
is a sponsor.
>>>
>>> When you click on the link then the portal ask you to authenticate with the
>>> sponsor credential but the format of the username depend of the username
>>> attribute you defined (like sAMAccountName or userPrincipalName).
>>
gt; When you click on the link then the portal ask you to authenticate with the
> sponsor credential but the format of the username depend of the username
> attribute you defined (like sAMAccountName or userPrincipalName).
>
>
> Le 20-10-07 à 12 h 13, Louis Scaringella via PacketFe
onsor credential but the format of the username depend of the username
>> attribute you defined (like sAMAccountName or userPrincipalName).
>>
>>
>> Le 20-10-07 à 12 h 13, Louis Scaringella via PacketFence-users a écrit :
>>> I tried the same thing, but using Active Directory so
, but doesn’t mark that
user as “sponsor” in its attributes.
Louis Scaringella
Security Systems Engineer
Yellow Dog Networks, Inc
785-342-7903
> On Oct 7, 2020, at 11:13 AM, Louis Scaringella via PacketFence-users
> wrote:
>
> I tried the same thing, but using Active Directory sour
that the user doesn’t
have access to sponsor.
The AD source is now set to have an administrative rule to mark as sponsor.
Louis Scaringella
Security Systems Engineer
Yellow Dog Networks, Inc
785-342-7903
> On Oct 7, 2020, at 10:48 AM, Louis Scaringella via PacketFence-users
> wrote:
>
> Of c
20, at 8:17 AM, Fabrice Durand via PacketFence-users
> wrote:
>
> Hello Louis,
>
> can you provide the packetfence.log when you authenticate and hit the portal ?
>
> Regards
>
> Fabrice
>
>
> Le 20-10-06 à 17 h 30, Louis Scaringella via PacketFence-users a écr
> you will need to check in the packetfence.log what authentication source is
> used when you log on the portal (to validate the access).
>
> Regards
>
> Fabrice
>
>
> Le 20-10-06 à 21 h 47, Louis Scaringella via PacketFence-users a écrit :
>> I made some progress with
https://github.com/inverse-inc/packetfence/issues/3960
Are you using IP in this case then?
Thank you,
Louis Scaringella
Security Systems Engineer
Yellow Dog Networks
785-342-7903
On Oct 7, 2020, at 12:22 AM, Louis Scaringella
wrote:
Hello,
Not sure offhand about your issue but I ran into
Hello,
Not sure offhand about your issue but I ran into an issue similar a while ago.
Under your network interfaces, do you have one that has Radius enabled on it in
to listen in addition to management?
Also, are you certain that IP of the controller in the log matches the switch
IP you have
I made some progress with this. I can now progress past the sponsor email
section and it accepts it. The sponsor gets the email, clicks the link, I login
with the sponsor account, but then it says "does not have permission to sponsor
a user”.
Any ideas now?
Louis Scaringella
Security Systems
Hello,
I’m having an issue with the captive portal with sponsored guest access.
Basically, when I go to test this and enter a sponsor email, it tells me that
email doesn’t have access to be a sponsor. Unfortunately, there isn’t great
documentation on this process and the other posts about this
The exact message is :
Email [myem...@mydomain.com] is not allowed to sponsor guest access.
When I run the following test, it matches my authentication source which has
this marked as a sponsor.
[root@localhost bin]# ./pftest authentication lscaringe...@ydn.co xx
Testing
020, at 8:58 AM, Louis Scaringella via PacketFence-users
> wrote:
>
> To add to this, I tried add an advanced filter with what showed up for the
> SSID name in the Radius request in the audit logs but still didn’t match
> this. Things like called-station-ID and ArubaESSID but no
.
Louis Scaringella
Security Systems Engineer
Yellow Dog Networks, Inc
785-342-7903
> On Oct 5, 2020, at 7:13 PM, Louis Scaringella via PacketFence-users
> wrote:
>
> Any ideas on this?
>
> Louis Scaringella
> Security Systems Engineer
> Yellow Dog Networks, Inc
> 785-3
www.inverse.ca
>>
>> Inverse inc. :: Leaders behind SOGo (
>> http://www.sogo.nu) and PacketFence (http://packetfence.org)
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> On Oct 3, 2020, at 5:00 AM, Louis Scaringella via PacketFence-users
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>
erse.ca :: +1.514.447.4918 (x145) :: www.inverse.ca
>
> Inverse inc. :: Leaders behind SOGo (
> http://www.sogo.nu) and PacketFence (http://packetfence.org)
>
>
>
>
>> On Oct 3, 2020, at 5:00 AM, Louis Scaringella via PacketFence-users
>> wrote:
>>
>
: Leaders behind SOGo (
> http://www.sogo.nu) and PacketFence (http://packetfence.org)
>
>
>
>
>> On Oct 3, 2020, at 5:00 AM, Louis Scaringella via PacketFence-users
>> wrote:
>>
>> Ultimately what I am trying to accomplish is to have multiple connecti
I am running 10.1, I forgot to mention.
Louis Scaringella
Security Systems Engineer
Yellow Dog Networks, Inc
785-342-7903
> On Oct 3, 2020, at 1:40 AM, Louis Scaringella
> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> When I configure a custom connection profile for my open guest captive portal
> connection with
Hello,
When I configure a custom connection profile for my open guest captive portal
connection with AUP, I am able to have the connection profile get triggered and
used when I use the Connection Type filter with “Wireless-802.11-NoEAP”.
However, if I add the condition of all and add the SSID
Ultimately what I am trying to accomplish is to have multiple connection
profiles chosen by SSID so that I can present different captive portal pages
and authentication types. The only way I see to do that is through the
connection profile.
Am I missing something with the SSID filter not
I’m a bit confused. What is the best method to completely delete a node from
the node list? I don’t see an option in the GUI.
Any help is appreciated and thanks for your time.
Louis Scaringella
Security Systems Engineer
Yellow Dog Networks, Inc
785-342-7903
The information transmitted,
Got it figured out!
Thank you,
Louis Scaringella
Security Systems Engineer
Yellow Dog Networks
785-342-7903
> On Aug 17, 2020, at 12:36 AM, Louis Scaringella via PacketFence-users
> wrote:
>
> Can someone point me in the right direction for creating a custom web GUI
>
Can someone point me in the right direction for creating a custom web GUI user
other than the “admin” account? I’d like individual user accounts for web
administration if possible.
Any help is greatly appreciated.
Louis Scaringella
Security Systems Engineer
Yellow Dog Networks, Inc
t disable packetfence-radiusd-acct.service
>
> systemctl disable packetfence-radiusd-acct.service
>
> Regards
>
> Fabrice
>
>
> Le 20-07-22 à 22 h 15, Louis Scaringella via PacketFence-users a écrit :
>> In the /var/log/messages log I see this:
>>
>> Ju
Fix is on Github for this.
https://github.com/inverse-inc/packetfence/issues/5681
Thank you,
Louis Scaringella
Security Systems Engineer
Yellow Dog Networks
785-342-7903
On Jul 22, 2020, at 8:02 PM, Michael Brown via PacketFence-users
wrote:
We are seeing this too. Did you find a
problem and why pfcmd.pl keeps getting triggered
and ran.
Any ideas?
Louis Scaringella
Security Systems Engineer
Yellow Dog Networks, Inc
785-342-7903
> On Jul 22, 2020, at 5:21 PM, Louis Scaringella via PacketFence-users
> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I just install Cent OS 7.8 and ins
wrote:
>
> Bug with winbindd not being enabled after joining the domain...so winbindd
> isn’t running when you reboot.
>
> Run /usr/local/pf/addons/pf-maint.pl to pull latest patches and try again.
>
> On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 1:02 PM Louis Scaringella via PacketFence-users
not sure where to adjust this.
Any help would be greatly appreciated!
Louis Scaringella
Security Systems Engineer
Yellow Dog Networks, Inc
785-342-7903
> On Jul 22, 2020, at 11:45 AM, Louis Scaringella via PacketFence-users
> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> We are running PacketFence
Hello,
I just install Cent OS 7.8 and installed PacketFence and applied the latest bug
fixes today.
When running the top command, I seem to be having an issue now where the
pfcmd.pl and perl processes are continuously running and using high CPU. Any
ideas where to start with investigating why
Hello,
We are running PacketFence 10.1.0 and running into an issue when joining the
domain. It seems we are able to join the domain just fine, but after a
rebooting, we see the message “Cannot open network namespace RQSDomain”. When
we re-join it seems to join fine and is green, but always
I’m not certain. I’ll have to try and gather that from my client.
Thank you,
Louis Scaringella
Security Systems Engineer
Yellow Dog Networks
785-342-7903
> On Jun 22, 2020, at 12:21 AM, Nicolas Quiniou-Briand wrote:
>
> Hi Louis,
>
> I reopened your issue [1]. Could you tell me if you got
Perfect! Thank you so much.
> On Jun 18, 2020, at 8:42 AM, Nicolas Quiniou-Briand wrote:
>
>
>
>> On 18/06/2020 15:19, Louis Scaringella wrote:
>> Do you know when it’ll be available on the website? I’ll send it over to my
>> client to try ASAP.
>
> It has been updated 20 minutes ago:
Looks like this did not work, at least in my customer environment. Here is
their response:
Still the same error. I tried this on both our old cluster and the HCI
cluster. The error occurs when it is trying to validate the storage.
Louis Scaringella
Security Systems Engineer
Yellow Dog
I will give it a try with one of my clients as soon as I can. Thanks!
I don’t have VMware 7 to test with just yet.
Louis
> On Jun 18, 2020, at 12:19 AM, Nicolas Quiniou-Briand via PacketFence-users
> wrote:
>
> Hello Louis,
>
>> On 17/06/2020 23:20, Louis Scaringella
ust yet.
>
> Louis
>
>> On Jun 18, 2020, at 12:19 AM, Nicolas Quiniou-Briand via PacketFence-users
>> wrote:
>>
>> Hello Louis,
>>
>>>> On 17/06/2020 23:20, Louis Scaringella via PacketFence-users wrote:
>>> I may install in ESXI 6.7 and the
>
> I had the same problem, I solved to install it first on the vmware player or
> workstation and then convert and then upload it on the infrastructure.
> Thanks
>
> On Wed, 17 Jun 2020, 20:52 Louis Scaringella via PacketFence-users,
> wrote:
> There is an issue when using the
; On Jun 4, 2020, at 9:56 PM, Durand fabrice via PacketFence-users
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello Louis,
>>>
>>> my answer bellow.
>>>
>>> Le 20-06-04 à 21 h 53, Louis Scaringella via PacketFence-users a écrit :
>>>> Hello,
>>>&
0-06-04 à 21 h 53, Louis Scaringella via PacketFence-users a écrit :
>> Hello,
>>
>> Thank you for your time in helping.
>>
>> I am working with a client and the goal is to build upon the current 802.1X
>> PEAP environment they have with Windows NPS and expand this t
llow.
>
> Le 20-06-04 à 21 h 53, Louis Scaringella via PacketFence-users a écrit :
>> Hello,
>>
>> Thank you for your time in helping.
>>
>> I am working with a client and the goal is to build upon the current 802.1X
>> PEAP environment they have with Win
0, at 9:56 PM, Durand fabrice via PacketFence-users
>> wrote:
>>
>> Hello Louis,
>>
>> my answer bellow.
>>
>> Le 20-06-04 à 21 h 53, Louis Scaringella via PacketFence-users a écrit :
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> Thank you for your t
Hello,
Thank you for your time in helping.
I am working with a client and the goal is to build upon the current 802.1X
PEAP environment they have with Windows NPS and expand this to use PacketFence
and to limit BYOD by using MAC address authentication in conjunction with
802.1X PEAP.
Thanks! I always like to get different perspectives on how people do things.
That is the same with many of my customer environments.
> On May 23, 2019, at 3:16 PM, Sallee, Jake via PacketFence-users
> wrote:
>
>> Out of curiosity, how are you prevent IPv6 addresses from flowing? Is this
>>
Out of curiosity, how are you prevent IPv6 addresses from flowing? Is this at
the router/L3 switch or firewall level?
What about non-routable link local addresses?
> On May 23, 2019, at 1:21 PM, Sallee, Jake via PacketFence-users
> wrote:
>
> Max:
>
> This strikes me as an uninformed
fixed the issue with the aruba instant access, just need to run
>>> /usr/local/pf/addons/pf-main.pl , restart packetfence and use the aruba
>>> instant access module.
>>>
>>> Regards
>>>
>>> Fabrice
>>>
>>>
>>>>
wrote:
>
> hello Louis,
>
> i fixed the issue with the aruba instant access, just need to run
> /usr/local/pf/addons/pf-main.pl , restart packetfence and use the aruba
> instant access module.
>
> Regards
>
> Fabrice
>
>
>> Le 19-05-16 à 02 h 30, Louis Scaring
> this myself. Anyway we can create a module specifically for Aruba 6.5+ that
> would work with Instant and Controllers?
>
> Louis Scaringella
> Security Systems Engineer
> Yellow Dog Networks, Inc
> 785-342-7903
>
>
>
>
>
>
>> On May 15, 2019, at 6:19 PM, Louis Sc
rsed in Perl to do
this myself. Anyway we can create a module specifically for Aruba 6.5+ that
would work with Instant and Controllers?
Louis Scaringella
Security Systems Engineer
Yellow Dog Networks, Inc
785-342-7903
> On May 15, 2019, at 6:19 PM, Louis Scaringella via PacketFence-use
I have another open thread with this same issue, but I upgraded tonight to 9.0
and I am still having the same problem with this Aruba controller and instant
module. Seems the module itself errors out:
May 16 01:06:50 PacketFence-ZEN packetfence_httpd.portal: httpd.portal(3377)
WARN:
he controller and processed, so
>> something with the session isn’t right.
>>
>> Any ideas?
>>
>> Louis Scaringella
>> Security Systems Engineer
>> Yellow Dog Networks, Inc
>> 785-342-7903
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>&
w/inverse-inc/packetfence/pull/4211.diff
> | patch -p1
>
> Also is it a Aruba COntroller in cluster ?
>
> Regards
> Fabrice
>
> Le 19-05-15 à 11 h 11, Louis Scaringella via PacketFence-users a écrit :
>> Hi Fabrice,
>>
>> I ran the /usr/local/pf/addons/pf-maint.
> Instant access module instead(we did it because the CoA changed on this
> equipment)
>
> curl
> https://patch-diff.githubusercontent.com/raw/inverse-inc/packetfence/pull/4211.diff
> | patch -p1
>
> Also is it a Aruba COntroller in cluster ?
>
> Regards
> Fabri
t; curl
> https://patch-diff.githubusercontent.com/raw/inverse-inc/packetfence/pull/4211.diff
> | patch -p1
>
> Also is it a Aruba COntroller in cluster ?
>
> Regards
> Fabrice
>
> Le 19-05-15 à 11 h 11, Louis Scaringella via PacketFence-users a écrit :
>> Hi Fabrice
This is the section of code that appears to be an issue:
my $node_info = node_attributes($mac);
# transforming MAC to the expected format 00-11-22-33-CA-FE
$mac = lc($mac);
$mac =~ s/://g;
I can tell you that the MAC address format that appears on the controller
CoA changed on this
> equipment)
>
> curl
> https://patch-diff.githubusercontent.com/raw/inverse-inc/packetfence/pull/4211.diff
> | patch -p1
>
> Also is it a Aruba COntroller in cluster ?
>
> Regards
> Fabrice
>
> Le 19-05-15 à 11 h 11, Louis Scaringella via
. The
CoA is getting to the controller and processed, so something with the session
isn’t right.
Any ideas?
Louis Scaringella
Security Systems Engineer
Yellow Dog Networks, Inc
785-342-7903
> On May 14, 2019, at 8:32 PM, Louis Scaringella via PacketFence-users
> wrote:
>
> It
cess then you will need to apply this
> patch:
>
> cd /usr/local/pf
>
> curl
> https://patch-diff.githubusercontent.com/raw/inverse-inc/packetfence/pull/4211.diff
> | patch -p1
>
> and restart packetfence and choose "Aruba Instant Access" as the switch mod
I’m very confused because also seeing this in Packetfence logs. Looks like it
is authenticating then dissociating right away.
May 14 16:17:12 PacketFence-ZEN packetfence_httpd.portal: httpd.portal(3367)
INFO: [mac:00:24:d6:5b:30:bc] User default has authenticated on the portal.
Captive portal AUP page is now displayed, I hit accept, and it says “You
network access is currently being enabled…..”, however the new role isn’t sent
to the controller.
But getting this error now:
[root@PacketFence-ZEN DynamicRouting]# cat /usr/local/pf/logs/httpd.portal.error
May 14
Hello,
I’m relatively new to PacketFence, but not NAC in general. I’m having some
difficulty getting PacketFence to work in my lab environment with the Captive
Portal correctly.
I have a single interface that i’ve setup for management, RADIUS, and the
portal. I have an Aruba wireless
Are you saying that the server.pem for the captive portal needs to include the
private key and intermediates bundled? It appears different then from the web
admin where you can configure the .conf file to include 3 separate files for
these?
Louis Scaringella
Security Systems Engineer
Yellow
ration in packetfence you can choose to strip on the
>>> portal/radius/admin, also you can add "strip" in the freeradius option and
>>> it will add the configuration in freeradius.
>>>
>>> Regards
>>>
>>> Fabrice
>>>
>>>
>>
Anyone aware of where to go to change the default admin SSL certificate as well
as anything used for captive portal, etc?
Louis Scaringella
Security Systems Engineer
Yellow Dog Networks, Inc
785-342-7903
The information transmitted, including any attachments, is intended only for
the
ose to strip on the
> portal/radius/admin, also you can add "strip" in the freeradius option and it
> will add the configuration in freeradius.
>
> Regards
>
> Fabrice
>
>
> Le 19-05-09 à 10 h 16, Louis Scaringella via PacketFence-users a écrit :
Thank you! I’m seeing my other message now showing up.
Louis Scaringella
Security Systems Engineer
Yellow Dog Networks, Inc
785-342-7903
> On May 9, 2019, at 4:59 PM, Durand fabrice via PacketFence-users
> wrote:
>
> yes
>
> Le 19-05-09 à 10 h 23, Louis Scaringella via
I’m embarrassed to say at my age, i’ve never used a mailing list so trying to
understand how it works. Will this message show up on Sourceforge?
Louis Scaringella
Security Systems Engineer
Yellow Dog Networks, Inc
785-342-7903
The information transmitted, including any attachments, is
Where is the username strip option configured? Is this a FreeRadius config?
The information transmitted, including any attachments, is intended only for
the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential
and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission,
88 matches
Mail list logo
